We focus on a previous study showing enhanced motor sequence learning performance in OA when coupled with active tDCS stimulation. In their study, Zimerman et al. (2013) found a facilitating effect of M1 anodal tDCS on sequence learning in OA, these…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
gezonde veroudering
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Participants will perform a sequence-learning task, performance on this task
will provide the main outcome parameters. The participant uses a response box
to learn to tap a 5-element sequence as many times as possible in a 3 minute
time period. All right-hand fingers excluding the thumb are used. In total, 8
blocks of 3 minutes tapping are included. In the fixed-sequence blocks
(Baseline Sequence, and practice blocks 1 to 5), a fixed sequence is displayed
continuously on the computer screen. In the random-sequence blocks (1 block
before and 1 block after the fixed-sequence blocks), a new random sequence is
to be performed after every sequence performance.
The main study parameter will be the number of sequences performed correctly,
relative to the baseline sequence block, during each practice block.
Secondary outcome
The secondary study parameter will be the number of random sequences performed
correctly in the post-test random sequence block, relative to the baseline
random sequence block.
Background summary
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a technique that can increase
excitability of the cortex. It has been used in many studies, including young
and older adults (YA and OA), to enhance cognitive performance. In the light of
the current aging population, enhancing cognition in healthy OA is a promising
direction of research. Unfortunately, results have not been consistent and
differential findings between YA and OA are understood poorly. Accordingly,
there has been a call to advance the field by taking a more systematic
approach. Therefore, we aim to conduct a study that replicates an important
existing result, namely, that tDCS can enhance motor (sequence) learning in OA.
To better understand previous findings of differential results between age
groups, we will extend the existing study with an extra learning condition that
will allow us to tear apart contributions of tDCS to task-general and
sequence-specific learning in OA and YA. Because higher age is often related to
reduced dexterity, we expect a larger effect of tDCS on task-general learning
in OA compared to YA.
Study objective
We focus on a previous study showing enhanced motor sequence learning
performance in OA when coupled with active tDCS stimulation. In their study,
Zimerman et al. (2013) found a facilitating effect of M1 anodal tDCS on
sequence learning in OA, these effects were still present during retention
tests. Surprisingly, they found no effect of atDCS on learning in YA and no
learning at all in the OA sham control condition. The Zimerman et al. (2013)
study warrants replication in order to: 1) confirm the important main result of
facilitation of sequence learning in OA; 2) confirm the unexpected findings
regarding the YA and sham conditions; and 3) to potentially extend these
results by testing additional hypotheses. Specifically, an opportunity to
extend on the previous findings is to include random sequences in the practice
and retention sessions. This allows us to distinguish between tDCS
contributions to task-general versus sequence-specific learning.
Study design
The study follows a two (Age Group: YA versus OA) * two (tDCS Condition: atDCS
versus sham, within subjects) design. tDCS Conditions will be separated by at
least 10 days and blinded to participants and experiment leader.
Intervention
We will treat participants with a Neuroelectrics Starstim tCS, a class IIa
device according to the classification in the Council Directive 93/42/CEE for
medical devices. TDCS will be delivered through rubber electrodes housed in 25
cm2 saline-soaked sponges. In both stimulation conditions, the anode electrode
will be placed above the hand area of the left primary motor cortex (C3 will be
localized using the 10-20 EEG system); the cathode electrode will be placed on
the right supraorbital region. Impedance is checked before and during
stimulation to ensure good contact quality of the sponges with the scalp. The
stimulation will be started at the onset of the practice phase (practice block
1) of the sequence-learning task. For both stimulation conditions, the current
will be ramped up to 1 mA (0.04 mA / cm2) over 8 seconds. In the sham control
stimulation condition, the current will be delivered for 30 seconds before
being ramped down. In the stimulation condition, the current will be delivered
for 20 minutes before being ramped down.
Study burden and risks
The burden and risks associated with the behavioural aspects (visiting the lab;
administering questionnaires and computer task) of this study are low. The
applied tDCS intervention is well tolerated and has generally been associated
only with minor adverse effects in healthy humans, such as headache, moderate
fatigue, nausea, and an itching sensation as well as skin irritation under the
electrodes. Regarding tDCS, standardized protocols and considerable literature
including clinical studies exists, and a recent review of 172 articles
concludes that *tDCS is a safe technique when used in 1*2 sessions for healthy
volunteers* (Brunoni et al., 2011). The participants will not have any direct
personal benefit from participation; the main benefit is an increased
fundamental understanding of the possibilities to enhance motor learning in
different age groups. In the light of the current aging population, enhancing
cognition in healthy OA is a highly relevant and promising direction of
research. An example of a potential specific application of insights in the
effects of tDCS on motor learning is for example improved re-learning of motor
skills after stroke.
De Zul 10
Enschede 7522 NJ
NL
De Zul 10
Enschede 7522 NJ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
* Age 62 * 75 or 18 * 30 years
* Right-handed, to be confirmed by using the Edinburgh handedness inventory (Oldfield, 1971).
* Good vision (on 1 meter distance), glasses are allowed
Exclusion criteria
* History of skin diseases that could result in irritation of the skin underneath the electrodes
* History of epilepsy or a known case of epilepsy in a first degree relative
* Metallic implants in the brain
* Presence of cardiac pacemakers, implanted heart rhythm monitor, implanted defibrillator, cochlear implant or implanted brain electrodes
* Presence of severe or frequent headache
* Use of medication that alters the motor cortex excitability
* Use of medication that, according to the product information, can increase the chance of seizures.
* Use of any illegal drugs in the last month (relying on self-report)
* Pregnancy
* Had spinal surgery or have drains in their spinal cord or ventricles
* Other neurological disorders
* A history of cardiac conditions that interfere with physical load
* Severe depression
* A score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) of 22 or lower, indicating mild cognitive impairment (Nasreddine et al., 2005). This tool has been extensively validated (e.g., Freitas, Simões, Alves, & Santana, 2013). YA will not be administered this questionnaire. See appendices for full questionnaire.
* Severe motor problems or limitations in using the fingers or arms, chronic joint pain, arthritis or rheumatism
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL58571.044.16 |