To provide high level of evidence that omitting perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis does not increase the postoperative infection rate, in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Gallbladder disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary outcome measure is the development of postoperative infections
(surgical site and distant infections) within 30 days after surgery.
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints are the individual postoperative infections, other
postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay and total costs.
Background summary
Acute calculous cholecystitis is the third most frequent cause of emergency
admissions to surgical wards. The standard treatment is cholecystectomy. It is
current practice to administer a single prophylactic dose of intravenous
antibiotics, prior the incision.
In current literature high level evidence is available that in patients
undergoing elective cholecystectomy for uncomplicated cholelithiasis,
prophylactic antibiotics do not decrease the incidence of postoperative
infections. Besides, different studies suggest that extended antibiotic
prophylaxis provides no benefit in preventing postoperative infections in
patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing emergency cholecystectomies.
The remaining quenstion is whether even a single dose of antibiotic
prophylaxis, current practice, is beneficial in case of emergency
cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis. We hypothesize that omitting
antibiotic prophylaxis in these patiƫnts does not lead to an increase in
postoperative infection rate
If this study demonstrates that the absence of antibiotic prophylaxis does not
increase the infection rate, the use of perioperative antibiotic for this
indication can be dropped as a whole and the guidelines will be adapted. When
the use of antibiotics appears unnecessary in these patients, the role of
antibiotic prophylaxis in the entire upper gastrointestinal tract surgery
becomes eminent. A decrease of use of antibiotics on such a scale may result in
a large decrease of needless medical activities, costs and bacterial
resistance.
Study objective
To provide high level of evidence that omitting perioperative antibiotic
prophylaxis does not increase the postoperative infection rate, in patients
with acute calculous cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Study design
A randomized controlled, multicenter, non-inferiority trial.
Patients will be randomly allocated to:
* No antibiotic treatment
* A single dose of 2000 milligrams of first generation cephalosporin (20mL),
15-30 minutes prior to surgery.
Intervention
Omitting antibiotic prophylaxis
Study burden and risks
If this study demonstrates that omitting antibiotic prophylaxis does not
increase the infection rate, it*s use for this indication can be dropped as a
whole and the guidelines will be adapted. Then, the role of antibiotic
prophylaxis in the entire upper gastrointestinal tract surgery becomes eminent.
A decrease of use of antibiotics on such a scale may result in a large decrease
of needless medical activities, costs and bacterial resistance.
If omitting antibiotic prophylaxis should be unjust, an infection that could
have been prevented by antibiotic prophylaxis may occur. A distant infection
requires antibiotic treatment, a surgical site infection may require opening
of the wound or percutaneous drainage of an intra-abdominal abscess. All
procedures in this study are part of the normal medical treatment for acute
cholecystitis, no extra (invasive) procedures or laboratory tests will be
performed. Patient will be seen at the outpatient clinic one week postoperative
and will be called to answer questions, four weeks after surgery.
Koekoekslaan 1
Nieuwegein 3430EM
NL
Koekoekslaan 1
Nieuwegein 3430EM
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
* Acute calculous cholecystitis, defined as mild or moderate according to Tokyo Guidelines
* Cholecystectomy
* Written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* < 18 years of age
* Acalculous cholecystitis
* Acute calculous cholecystitis, defined as severe according to Tokyo Guidelines
* Patients who received antibiotic treatment on admission
* Proven allergy to cefazolin
* Pregnancy
* Immune compromised patients
* Indication for endoscopic retrograde pancreaticocholangiography (ERCP) on admission
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2015-001536-38-NL |
CCMO | NL53084.100.15 |
OMON | NL-OMON24030 |