Evaluate the added value of new MRI and US techniques for the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders such as MMN and CIDP and the MMN-mimic fSMA.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Demyelinating disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Correlation between MRI, US, NCS, muscle strength, disability scale.
Secondary outcome
1. NCS outcome (EFNS/PNS guideline)
a. Temporal dispersion, Conduction velocity, conduction block
2. US
a. Cross sectional area
b. Vascularization
c. Echo intensity
3. MRI
a. Diameters
b. Scoring of hyperintensities and swelling
c. DTI parameters and architecture of affected nerves and muscles
4. Muscle strength * hand-held dynamometry and MRC scores
5. Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale (ONLS)
6. INCAT sensory Scale (ISS)
Background summary
Diagnosis of acquired immune mediated diseases affecting peripheral nerves like
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) and Multifocal Motor
Neuropathy (MMN) currently relies on extensive electrophysiological conduction
studies (NCS) in addition to neurological examination. However, the proximal
parts of the nerves (brachial plexus and major part of upper leg and
lumbosacral plexus) cannot be reliably studied, so that diagnosis may be missed
and patient may not receive proper immunosuppressive or -modulatory treatment.
In patients presenting with monomelic/focal motor deficits, an important
differential diagnosis is that between MMN and focal/monomelic Spinal Muscular
Atrophy (fSMA). MMN in contrast to fSMA can be treated. However, the
above-mentioned limitations of NCS at proximal sites may hinder the distinction
between both disease entities.
MRI and ultrasound (US) are promising techniques to serve as important adjunct
tools to establish diagnosis of immune mediated neuromuscular disorders, as
they allow for visualization of the proximal parts of the nerves.
In the current diagnostic guidelines, increased signal intensity on T2-weighted
MRI, associated with a diffuse nerve swelling of the brachial plexus already is
one of the supportive diagnostic criteria for MMN. New MRI and US techniques
may be of additional value.
In this explorative study we will compare the results of extensive NCS
measurements, muscle strength assessment, sensory examination, assessment of
clinical disability, MRI and US in MMN and CIDP patients. These results will be
used to study the nerves of fSMA patients with an equal clinical presentation
as MMN patients, with emphasis on the proximal nerve parts. Patients will be
recruited from an existing database and if possible new patients will be added.
Future prospects: replace (part of) the extensive NCS by the imaging techniques
which will be less time consuming, less painful, thus more patient friendly,
and hopefully an important aid to the diagnosis.
Study objective
Evaluate the added value of new MRI and US techniques for the diagnosis of
neuromuscular disorders such as MMN and CIDP and the MMN-mimic fSMA.
Study design
Observational, diagnostic, cross-sectional.
Study burden and risks
Patients with MMN, CIDP and patients with focal motor deficits, currently
diagnosed as fSMA, will be included. In case no recent (n<6 months) NCS is
available this will be performed. Patients will undergo MRI and US of either
arms or legs and brachial or lumbosacral plexus. To assess disease severity
muscle strength and clinical disability will be measured.
Participation in this study will in no way interfere with any treatment
decision.
Risks for undergoing NCS, MRI and ultrasound are minimal, provided precautions
have been made to exclude those who are not allowed to enter the MRI scanner. A
routine AMC questionnaire will be used. Only individuals with recent traceable
MRI feasible prostheses will be included.
There are no direct benefits for participants.
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 110DD
NL
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 110DD
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
* Signs and symptoms consistent with Multifocal Motor Neuropathy, Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or Focal/monomelic Spinal Muscular Atrophy;* Adult (*18 years )
* Fulfilling the EFNS/PNS criteria
Exclusion criteria
* Subject is unwilling or unable to participate in this study and to give informed consent.
* Legally incompetent adult
* Use of drugs which are known to cause motor neuropathy
* Other diseases known to cause neuropathy or to reduce mobility
* Diseases known to lead to severe handicap or death at short notice
* Subject has a prosthesis which is not verifiable MR-compatible by registration number.
* Contraindications to undergo a MRI scan (I.e. pregnancy, claustrophobia, metal corpora aliena or metal implants such as pacemakers).
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL48090.018.14 |