Primary Objective:To examine the effect of pre-operative cooling versus pressure bandage on the time to surgery in adult patients who sustained a displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture (DIACF) that will be treated operatively using an extended…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Fractures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Time to surgery
Secondary outcome
Preoperative and postoperative pain
Preoperative and postoperative swelling
Preoperative and postoperative foot/ankle circumference
Postoperative hospital length of stay
Satisfaction with the approach to reduce swelling
Adverse events within three months after surgery
Background summary
Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) are challenging to treat
and are associated with a long rehabilitation period. As the incidence shows a
peak in persons in their wage-earning population, the burden to society is
high. Surgery should be done as soon as possible. Timing of surgery is mostly
determined by the amount of swelling that occurs after trauma. Swelling
occurring after surgery may increase the risk of disturbed wound healing and
prolong hospital length of stay. Cooling devices have been developed in order
to reduce preoperative and postoperative swelling. Furthermore cooling may
reduce the need for analgesics. Cooling is expected to result in earlier
surgery, shorter hospital length of stay and earlier mobilization, which in
turn reduces the risk of adverse events.
Study objective
Primary Objective:
To examine the effect of pre-operative cooling versus pressure bandage on the
time to surgery in adult patients who sustained a displaced intra-articular
calcaneal fracture (DIACF) that will be treated operatively using an extended
lateral or sinus tarsi approach.
Secondary Objective(s):
1) To examine the effect of pre- and post-operative cooling versus pressure
bandage on the level of pre- and postoperative pain in adult patients who
sustained a DIACF.
2) To examine the effect of pre- and postoperative cooling versus pressure
bandage on preoperative and postoperative swelling in adult patients who
sustained a calcaneal fracture.
3) To examine the effect of pre- and postoperative cooling versus pressure
bandage on foot/ankle circumference in adult patients who sustained a DIACF.
4) To examine the effect of postoperative cooling versus pressure bandage on
postoperative hospital length of stay in adult patients who sustained a
calcaneal fracture.
5) To examine patient satisfaction with the approach to reduce swelling
(cooling versus pressure bandage) in adult patients who sustained a calcaneal
fracture.
6) To examine the effect of pre- and postoperative cooling versus pressure
bandage on the rate of complications in adult patients who sustained a
calcaneal fracture.
Study design
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Intervention
Patients will be equally randomized to two groups:
1) Computer-controlled cooling brace
2) Pressure bandage
Study burden and risks
The intervention and control treatment are both standard of care, which
generally includes hospital admission. The follow-up program (outpatient
department visits, physical examination, and diagnostics) is standard for the
targeted population.
From enrolment until surgery, patients will be subjected daily to: 1) 5x
completion of pain question; 2) digital photo of affected foot
From enrolment until surgery, patients will also be subjected day 1 and 2 and
then every second day to: 1) duplicate measurement of foot/ankle circumference
on both sides; 2) duplicate measure of foot/ankle volume on both sides;
At day 2 and 7 postoperative, patients will be subjected to: 1) 1x completion
of pain question; 2) duplicate measurement of foot/ankle circumference; 3)
duplicate measure of foot/ankle volume; 4) digital photo of affected foot.
On the day of surgery and day 7 after surgery, patients will complete a VAS for
patient satisfaction with the approach to reduce swelling.
Follow-up data will be collected daily from hospital admission until discharge,
and at two weeks, six weeks, and three months after primary surgery. At each
visit, patients will be subjected to: 1) 1x completion of pain question; 2)
duplicate measurement of foot/ankle circumference; 3) duplicate measure of
foot/ankle volume; 4) digital photo of affected foot.
Therefore there is no additional risk for patients participating in this study.
The risk for study participants is the same as for patients who do not
participate
's-Gravendijkwal 230
Rotterdam 3000 CE
NL
's-Gravendijkwal 230
Rotterdam 3000 CE
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients with a displaced (> 2 mm step-off in posterior facet), intra-articular calcaneal fracture (Sanders type II-IV or OTA type 82C2-4 (8); confirmed on X-ray (lateral and AP with Brodèn view) or CT)
2. Indication for ORIF using an extended lateral or sinus tarsi approach
3. Adult men or women aged 18 years or older
4. Hospital presentation within two days after trauma
5. Provision of informed consent by patient
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients with a existing condition that result in asymmetrical morphometric characteristics of the distal part of either one of the lower legs
2. Additional traumatic injuries that might influence extremity volume (e.g., lower extremity fracture, pelvic fracture)
3. Patients with bilateral calcaneal fractures
4. Patients with a pathological, recurrent, or open calcaneal fracture
5. Patients with decreased sensory function in any leg that might affect pain sensation.
6. Patients unfit for surgery
7. Patients unwilling or unable to comply with the intervention or follow-up visit schedule
8. Insufficient comprehension of Dutch or English language to understand rehabilitation programs and other treatment information in the judgment of the attending physician
9. Participation in another surgical intervention or drug study that might influence any of the outcome parameters
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL54213.078.15 |