The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether electrical stimulation applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchrony with exhalation can be feasible to prevent the development of atrophy of the abdominal wall muscles during the…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Muscle disorders
- Thoracic disorders (excl lung and pleura)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The main study endpoint is the thickness of the abdominal wall muscles during
end-inspiration (ITabd) and end-expiration (ETabd), for both groups, as
measured by ultrasound.
Secondary outcome
The secondary endpoints are:
- the thickening fraction (TF) of the abdominal wall muscles: TFadb = (ITabd -
ETabd) / ETabd x 100%
- the thickness of the diaphragm during end-inspiration (ITdi) and
end-expiration (ETdi)
- the thickening fraction of the diaphragm: TFdi = (ITdi - ETdi) / ETdi x 100%
- echogenicity of the abdominal wall muscles
- the thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle
- functional respiratory measurements: vital capacity (VC), maximal expiratory
pressure (MEP), maximal inspiratory pressure
(MIP), cough pressure
- blood inflammatory markers (IL-6, IL-1, IL-8)
- weaning outcome
During follow-up:
- readmission to the ICU due to respiratory problems
- pneumonia acquired after ICU discharge.
These outcomes will be compared between both groups.
At last, feasibility parameters will be investigated:
- Estimated sample size for a larger randomized control trial, based on the
primary outcome parameter.
- Time needed to recruit patients
- Number of eligible patients: as number of the total ICU population
- Replacement rate after first stimulation test with ultrasound verification of
contraction during stimulation
Background summary
Approximately 30-40% of intubated patients at the intensive care unit (ICU)
take more than one attempt to wean from
mechanical ventilation (MV) and approximately 6-14% of intubated patients take
longer than 7 days to wean from MV.[1]-[5]
While MV can be lifesaving, patients requiring prolonged time on the ventilator
are susceptible to a wide range of clinical
complications and excess mortality.[1], [3], [4], [6] It is therefore
imperative for them to wean at the earliest possible time.
Although the pathophysiology of weaning failure is complex and multifaceted,
respiratory muscle dysfunction is a major
underlying factor for many patients and already occurs during the first five
days of MV [7]-[11] Weakness of the diaphragm,
abdominal, and intercostal muscles may result in to decreased cough function,
poor breathing force, and results in low blood
oxygen/elevated carbon dioxide levels. Consequently, patients are susceptible
to ICU acquired pneumonia and have difficulties
weaning.
Recent evidence suggests that neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can
be used as a safe therapy to maintain skeletal
muscle function in critically ill patients, e.g. by stimulating quadriceps
muscles in patients receiving MV.[12]-[20] This is a noninvasive
method, which incorporates the use of electrical current to activate skeletal
muscles and produce contractions without
active participation of the patient.[13], [14], [21]-[23] It thus follows that
a similar approach could be applied to the respiratory
muscles, in particular to the expiratory muscles, during MV therapy.
To test this hypothesis, a bedside transcutaneous electrical muscle stimulator
that applies NMES to the abdominal wall muscles
in synchrony with exhalation will be used. It has been demonstrated that this
technique acutely improves minute ventilation,
while not affecting the inspiratory load in healthy subjects, COPD patients and
patients receiving prolonged MV.[24]-[26]
This study will build upon this previous work and test the hypothesis that
exhalation synchronized NMES of the abdominal-wall
muscles can prevent expiratory muscle atrophy during the acute stages of MV.
The long-term goal of this study is to determine
whether this approach can improve lung function and thereby reduce the amount
of time it takes to wean patients from MV,
which could have a promising impact in critical care.
Study objective
The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether electrical
stimulation applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchrony with exhalation
can be feasible to prevent the development of atrophy of the abdominal wall
muscles during the acute stages of MV therapy. The secondary objectives of this
study are to analyse whether this intervention also affects: (1) the thickness
of the diaphragm, (2) functional respiratory measurements, (3) markers for
systemic inflammation, and (4) weaning outcome.
Other objectives are to study recruitment rate and time to collect data.
This data will be used to assess the feasibility, and estimate the sample size,
of a follow up fully powered study, which assesses clinically relevant
endpoints.
Study design
This study is a multicentre, randomized, sham-controlled intervention pilot
trial with patients, caregivers and outcome
assessors blinded to the treatment allocation.
The rationale of performing sham stimulation, and blinding of caregivers and
outcome assessors is to ensure that there will be
no difference in care provided between the intervention group and other
patients.
Intervention
The intervention will be NMES (versus a sham [control] intervention) applied to
the abdominal wall muscles for 30 minutes per
session, twice a day, 5 days per week, for 6 weeks or until the patient is
weaned from MV, whichever occurs sooner.
The sham-controlled group will receive the stimlulation as well, however the
stimulus intensity will be too low to induce muscle
contraction.
Study burden and risks
The study setting will be a mixed ICU. In addition to standard care, the
patients participating in this study will additionally receive two 30-minute
sessions of transcutaneous NMES therapy per day. The risks associated with
participation are negligible, since other studies have demonstrated the safety
of this intervention in ICU and non-ICU patients.[7-15],[22] Furthermore, NMES
is already used in the Radboudumc for physiotherapeutic purposes, which means
that we are familiar with the equipment.
Ultrasound measurements will be performed every other day to study the effect
of NMES. There are no risks associated with this assessment. After the patient
is weaned from MV, data from lung function measurements will be obtained. Since
these measurements are performed within routine care, this will not induce any
risks for participation in this study.
Two venous blood samples will be collected during enrolment and after the third
NMES session. This will be taken out of the intravenous catheter the patient
already has. Therefore this will not cause any further harm. Next to the fact
that all participants receive standard intensive care, each participant will be
monitored intensively to avoid any burden or risks.
Finally, all other measurements will be collected from chart review, in which
the patient is not directly involved.
References
[1] J. Doorduin, A. J. C. Haans, J. G. van der Hoeven, and L. M. A. Heunks,
*Difficult weaning: Principles and practice of a
structured diagnostic approach.,* Netherlands J. Crit. Care, vol. 17, no.
September, pp. 11-15, 2013.
[2] L. M. Heunks and J. G. van der Hoeven, *Clinical review: the ABC of weaning
failure--a structured approach.,* Crit. Care, vol.
14, p. 245, 2010.
[3] G.-C. Funk, S. Anders, M.-K. Breyer, O. C. Burghuber, G. Edelmann, W.
Heindl, G. Hinterholzer, R. Kohansal, R. Schuster, A.
Schwarzmaier-D*Assie, A. Valentin, and S. Hartl, *Incidence and outcome of
weaning from mechanical ventilation according to
new categories.,* Eur. Respir. J. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Clin. Respir. Physiol.,
vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 88-94, 2010.
[4] J.-M. Boles, J. Bion, a Connors, M. Herridge, B. Marsh, C. Melot, R. Pearl,
H. Silverman, M. Stanchina, a Vieillard-Baron, and
T. Welte, *Weaning from mechanical ventilation.,* Eur. Respir. J. Off. J. Eur.
Soc. Clin. Respir. Physiol., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1033-
1056, 2007.
[5] O. Peñuelas, F. Frutos-Vivar, C. Fernández, A. Anzueto, S. K. Epstein, C.
Apezteguía, M. González, N. Nin, K. Raymondos,
V. Tomicic, P. Desmery, Y. Arabi, P. Pelosi, M. Kuiper, M. Jibaja, D. Matamis,
N. D. Ferguson, and A. Esteban, *Characteristics
and outcomes of ventilated patients according to time to liberation from
mechanical ventilation,* Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
vol. 184, no. 4, pp. 430-437, 2011.
[6] S. K. Powers, M. P. Wiggs, K. J. Sollanek, and a. J. Smuder, *Ventilator-
induced diaphragm dysfunction: cause and effect.,*
AJP Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol., vol. 305, no. 6, pp. R464-R477, 2013.
[7] D. S. Criswell, R. A. Shanely, J. J. Betters, J. Michael, J. E. Sellman, D.
L. Van Gammeren, and K. Scott, *Cumulative effects
of aging and mechanical ventilation on in vitro diaphragm function.,* Chest,
vol. 124, pp. 2302-2308, 2003.
[8] S. K. Powers, A. N. Kavazis, and S. Levine, *Prolonged mechanical
ventilation alters diaphragmatic structure and function.,*
Crit. Care Med., vol. 37, no. 10, 2009.
[9] B. Polla, G. D*Antona, R. Bottinelli, and C. Reggiani, *Respiratory muscle
fibres: specialisation and plasticity.,* Thorax, vol.
59, no. 9, pp. 808-817, 2004.
[10] S. Levine, T. Nguyen, N. Taylor, M. E. Friscia, and M. T. Budak, *Rapid
disuse atrophy of diaphragm fibers in mechanically
ventilated humans,* N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 358, no. 13, pp. 1327-1335, 2008.
[11] S. K. Powers, R. A. Shanely, J. S. Coombes, T. J. Koesterer, M. McKenzie,
D. Van Gammeren, M. Cicale, and S. L. Dodd,
*Mechanical ventilation results in progressive contractile dysfunction in the
diaphragm.,* J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 92, no. 5, pp.
1851-1858, 2002.
[12] R. G. Brower, *Consequences of bed rest,* Crit. Care Med., vol. 37, pp.
S422-S428, 2009.
[13] M. E. Kho, A. D. Truong, R. G. Brower, J. B. Palmer, E. Fan, J. M. Zanni,
D. Nancy, D. R. Feldman, R. Korupolu, and M.
Needham, *Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for intensive care unit-acquired
weakness: protocol and methodological
implications for a randomized, sham-controlled phase II trial,* Phys. Ther.,
vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 1564-1579, 2012.
[14] N. Williams and M. Flynn, *A review of the efficacy of neuromuscular
electrical stimulation in critically ill patients,*
Physiother. Theory Pract., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 6-11, 2014.
[15] A. Abdellaoui, F. Gouzi, A. Couillard, G. Hugon, N. Molinari, T.
Lafontaine, O. Jonquet, and M. Hayot, *Skeletal muscle
effects of electrostimulation after COPD exacerbation: a pilot study,* Eur.
Respir. J., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 781-788, 2011.
[16] V. Gerovasili, K. Stefanidis, K. Vitzilaios, E. Karatzanos, P. Politis, A.
Koroneos, A. Chatzimichail, C. Routsi, C. Roussos,
and S. Nanas, *Electrical muscle stimulation preserves the muscle mass of
critically ill patients: a randomized study,* Crit. Care,
vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1-8, 2009.
[17] W. Gruther, F. Kainberger, V. Fialka-moser, T. Paternostro-sluga, M.
Quittan, C. Spiss, and R. Crevenna, *Effects of
neuromuscular electrical stimulation on muscle layer thickness of knee extensor
muscles in intensive care unit patients: a pilot
study,* J. Rehabil. Med., vol. 42, pp. 593-597, 2010.
[18] E. Karatzanos, V. Gerovasili, D. Zervakis, E. Tripodaki, K. Apostolou, I.
Vasileiadis, E. Papadopoulos, G. Mitsiou, D.
Tsimpouki, C. Routsi, and S. Nanas, *Electrical muscle stimulation: an
effective form of exercise and early mobilization to
preserve muscle strength in critically ill patients,* Crit. Care Res. Pract.,
pp. 1-8, 2012.
[19] E. Zanotti, G. Felicetti, and M. Maini, *Peripheral muscle strength
training in bed-bound patients with COPD receiving
mechanical ventilation,* Chest, vol. 124, pp. 292-296, 2003.
[20] G. C. Velmahos, P. Petrone, L. S. Chan, and E. Hanks, *Electrostimulation
for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis in
patients with major trauma: a prospective randomized study,* Surgery, pp. 493-
498, 2005.
[21] J. Chae, R. J. Triolo, K. L. Kilgore, G. H. Creasey, and A. F. DiMarco,
*Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation,* in Physical
Medicine and Rehabilitation: Principles and Practice, 4th ed., J. A. DeLisa, B.
M. Gans, and N. E. Walsh, Eds. Philadelphia:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005, pp. 1405-1407.
[22] L. Dumitru, A. Iliescu, C. Dumitru, R. Badea, S. S*vulescu, H. Dinu, and
M. Berteanu, *Physiological considerations on
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) in muscular strength training.,*
Palestrica third Millenn. - Civiliz. Sport, vol. 15, no.
2, pp. 134-139, 2014.
[23] B. M. Doucet, A. Lam, and L. Griffin, *Neuromuscular electrical
stimulation for skeletal muscle function,* Yale J. Biol. Med.,
vol. 85, pp. 201-215, 2012.
[24] A. J. McLachlan, A. N. McLean, D. B. Allan, and H. Gollee, *Changes in
pulmonary function measures following a passive
abdominal functional electrical stimulation training program,* J. Spinal Cord
Med., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 97-103, 2013.
[25] E. J. McCaughey, H. R. Berry, A. N. Mclean, and D. B. Allan, *Abdominal
functional electrical stimulation to assist ventilator
weaning in acute tetraplegia: a cohort study,* PLoS One, vol. 11, pp. 1-15,
2015.
[26] E. J. McCaughey, A. N. McLean, D. B. Allan, and H. Gollee, *Abdominal
functional electrical stimulation to enhance
mechanical insufflation-exsufflation,* J. Spinal Cord Med., pp. 1-6, 2016.
Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10 (huispost 710)
Nijmegen 6525 GA
NL
Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10 (huispost 710)
Nijmegen 6525 GA
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- informed consent
- age > 18 year
- invasive mechanical ventilation less than 72 hours
- expected duration of MV after inclusion > 72 hours
Exclusion criteria
- no visible abdominal wall muscles, assessed with ultrasound during routine care
- cardiac pacemaker
- congenital myopathies and/or existing central or peripheral neuropathies
- recent abdominal surgery within four weeks prior to study inclusion
- refractory / uncontrolled epilepsy
- BMI > 35
- pregnancy
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL57078.091.16 |