Primary Objective:- To determine the percentage of patients with EGFR mutation, ALK translocation and other genetic aberrations with an improved efficacy of molecular profiling in all stages of NSCLC.- To determine PD-L1 tumour proportion score in…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Respiratory and mediastinal neoplasms malignant and unspecified
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The percentage of patients with EGFR mutation or ALK translocation using the
combined tumour tissue and liquid biopsy analysis.
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints include the test performance of both techniques in
different stage of disease, the percentage of patients with a predefined
actionable genetic alteration, the costs, and the influence of the liquid
biopsies on the diagnostic yield of tissue molecular and pathological analysis.
Background summary
Non-small lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has a poor prognosis. At presentation 50-60%
of patients have stage I-III disease for which curative therapy is available.
But, in the majority of these patients the disease will metastasize and
systemic treatment is needed during the course of the disease. For metastasized
disease the 5-year overall survival rate is less than 5%.
Personalized treatment has become standard of care for metastasized NSCLC but
the proportion of patients for which targeted agents are available is still
modest. Next to targeted therapy currently immunotherapy is being introduced.
Targeted therapy is available for patients with EGFR and ALK gene aberrations
and many other targets are to be expected in the oncoming few years. For
patients with NSCLC wild-type ALK and EGFR, only chemotherapy is for first line
treatment that is often less effective than targeted therapy and has an
inferior toxicity profile. For patients that present with earlier stage disease
(stage I-III) currently no targeted agents have been approved. As of now, when
patients present with disseminated disease, molecular profiling is initiated.
The process of retrieving biopsy material from another hospital or collecting a
new biopsy, together with the molecular analysis itself can easily take up to 5
weeks. For approximately a quarter of patients, these samples are not available
in sufficient amount to perform predictive mutation analysis. Therefore a
substantial number of patients receives no targeted treatment. When however,
molecular profiles are available at an earlier stage of disease, more patients
who develop disseminated disease might benefit from personalized therapy
opportunities. Also because there is more time available we can perform the
molecular profiling in a cost-effective manner (that is sequentially and not
parallel), which will reduce the diagnostic costs. Although this strategy
resolves the delay to obtain a molecular diagnosis in the metastasized setting,
it won*t resolve the problem of insufficient material obtained with biopsy.
Therefore, we will use both tissue and blood-based genetic testing. We
hypothesize that early molecular screening will enable a timely switching to
targeted treatment and significantly improve survival and diagnostic
efficiency.
Study objective
Primary Objective:
- To determine the percentage of patients with EGFR mutation, ALK translocation
and other genetic aberrations with an improved efficacy of molecular profiling
in all stages of NSCLC.
- To determine PD-L1 tumour proportion score in all stages of NSCLC
Secondary Objective(s):
- To define the diagnostic value of liquid- and tissue biopsy-based molecular
analysis.
- To investigate the change in diagnostic yield of tissue-based molecular
analysis when blood-based molecular analysis is an available alternative.
- To explore the reasons for insufficient tumor material available for
molecular profiling.
- To define the frequency of pre-defined genetic alterations using the LEMA
approach.
- To estimate the costs of the LEMA approach and the introduction of
liquid-based analysis
- To compare results of molecular analysis at baseline and follow up of NSCLC.
- To explore the epidemiology of the PD-L1 biomarker expression in all stages
of NSCLC.
- To determine PD-L1 tumour proportion score in EGFR mutant and ALK rearranged
NSCLC
Study design
In this prospective multicentre trial tumours of all patients presenting with
NSCLC will be profiled upfront, irrespective of disease stage and pathology
using both tissue and blood-based genetic testing. A minimal molecular
profiling is depicted but other targets will be included in due time. The study
is divided in two parts. In the first part participating centres will have a
run-in period of half a year in which molecular profiling is performed as is
currently standard of care. This period will be used to measure the impact of
increased awareness on the diagnostic process. During the second part of the
study a comprehensive upfront profiling according to local standards will take
place for all NSCLC patients. Liquid (blood) biopsies will be included in order
to increase the diagnostic yield for those patients where tissue biopsies are
not adequate. Patients will be treated according to standard of care, or
included in clinical studies where appropriate. Re-biopsies (both tissue and
liquid) will be advocated at the time of establishing disease
progression/disseminated disease, and personalized therapy will be initiated
according to the existing data from the molecular profiling.
Study burden and risks
The expected diagnostic process will change and theoretically the number of
biopsy procedure might be increased and therefore the chance of minor
complications. However, the improved molecular profiling is thought to expand
treatment opportunities. Patients will benefit from a direct switch to targeted
treatment upon progression.
Plesmanlaan 121
Amsterdam 1066 CX
NL
Plesmanlaan 121
Amsterdam 1066 CX
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Suspicion of lung carcinoma or established NSCLC but awaiting start of definitive treatment
- Written informed consent to undergo diagnostic procedure and molecular analysis of the disease.
Exclusion criteria
- Not motivated to receive any treatment at any point in time. Patients who consider undergoing treatment in the future are eligible.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL54778.031.15 |