1. To provide a well-phenotyped population (readiness population) for the EPAD PoC trial to minimize trial screening failures 2. To provide a well-phenotyped probability-spectrum population for developing and continuously improving disease models…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Neurological disorders NEC
- Dementia and amnestic conditions
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Neuropsychological:
Verbal Episodic Memory List Learning & Story Memory (RBANS)
Visual Episodic Memory Figure Recall (RBANS)
Visuospatial/Constructional Figure Copy & Line Orientation (RBANS)
Language Picture Naming (RBANS)
Attention/Executive Functioning Semantic Fluency, Digit Span, Coding (RBANS)
Secondary outcome
Seconday study outcomes:
Biomarker Cerebral Spinal Fluid:
Measurements will include AD-related markers (Aβ, t-tau and p-tau), and this
data will be used for disease modelling and for staging of disease pathology.
MRI: Hippocampal and whole brain volume; Vascular burden (WM lesions, infarcts,
lacunes, microbleeds and superficial siderosis)
Exploratory study outcomes:
Working memory: Dot counting (NIH examiner)
Choise Reaction Time and Set Shifting: (Flanker (NIH Examiner/Toolbox)
Allocentric Space: Four Mountains Task (Cambridge Cognitive Neurosciences)
Navigation in Egocentric Space: Virtual Reality Supermarket Trolley (University
College London)
Depression: 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
Anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Sleep: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Everyday functioning: Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Questionnaire (Amsterdam IADLQ)
Exploratory neuroimaging outcomes:
Structural MRI: Cortical thickness, deep grey matter volumes; Fractional
anisotropy (FA) of temporal lobe, diffusion kurtosis (multi b-value DTI),
network alterations
Functional MRI: Global & parietal CBF; Changes within the default-mode network
& relation with hippocampal activity (rsfMRI); Bolus arrival time (multi-delay
ASL); Network analysis (rsfMRI)
Background summary
Alzheimer*s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia globally affecting
~7M people in Europe. As the population ages, the number of people with
dementia will rise and a concomitant rise in the dependency ratio means that
the economic burden of AD will increase dramatically from an already high
baseline (~ ¤262 billion in 2015). Attempts to impact on disease progression
pharmacologically in symptomatic populations remain ongoing, but recent results
have been disappointing. There is now consensus that the genesis of AD
pathology predates dementia onset by over 20 years, presenting an opportunity
for disease course modification before dementia onset and even prior to the
appearance of clinical symptoms. With numerous biologically active agents in
late phase trials which affect a range of pathological processes in AD (e.g.
anti-oligomerisation, secretase inhibitors, kinase inhibitors and anti-amyloid
monoclonal antibodies), the key challenge is to accurately identify individuals
with high probability of subsequent AD dementia development, who are suitable
for trial inclusion and willing to participate in secondary prevention studies.
Current proposals for defining an individual*s probability for developing AD
dementia based on either biomarkers or clinical symptoms have been focused on
the stage of AD close to dementia onset. Disease models and their phenotypic
expression needed for probability estimation in earlier stages in the disease
process are less well defined but the subject of intense study currently. It is
important to firstly develop accurate disease models for AD in early disease
stages when people do not yet have symptoms, or express only subjective
complaints of cognitive decline, or have only mild cognitive symptoms. These
people need to be followed-up longitudinally, and they could be recruited into
trials designed to reduce early disease burden or decrease the probability of
developing AD dementia.
To date, trials of potentially disease modifying drugs in AD have followed a
pattern of intervention with a single agent in lengthy and costly trials for
people with dementia or other clinically defined states thought proximal in
time to the onset of dementia. Only a few recent studies have applied adaptive
design principles that could avoid exposing very large numbers of research
participants to doses of experimental drugs that could have been identified as
ineffective earlier in the course of the study. As each trial works in
isolation of other trials, there have been a vast number of research
participants exposed to a placebo arm that could, given the right
infrastructure, have been shared between studies. These traditionally designed
trials have not led to any new licensed drugs for either the symptomatic
treatment of dementia or its secondary prevention for over 10 years. Moreover,
the basis for decisions to move into these trials was often on limited Phase 2
data, which did not fully address uncertainty regarding optimal dosing,
research participant selection and choice of outcome for the confirmatory
study.
The European Prevention of Alzheimer*s Dementia (EPAD) is a project to develop
an environment for and then test multiple different interventions for the
secondary prevention of AD dementia.
Study objective
1. To provide a well-phenotyped population (readiness population) for the EPAD
PoC trial to minimize trial screening failures
2. To provide a well-phenotyped probability-spectrum population for developing
and continuously improving disease models for AD in individuals without
dementia. The probability continuum spectrum will be derived from three
different dimensions: cognition, biomarkers, and traditional risk factors
(genetic and environmental)
3. To use disease models for assessing where and why research participants fall
in the overall probability continuum spectrum, and thereafter select research
participants for the EPAD PoC trial
4. To provide high quality run in, pre-randomisation data for the EPAD PoC
trial to measure the impact of various interventions against
Study design
EPAD LCS is a prospective, multicenter, pan-European, cohort study that will
have a well phenotyped probability-spectrum population to address the dual need
to develop accurate longitudinal models for AD covering the entire disease
course, and to create a pool of highly characterized individuals for the EPAD
PoC trial. EPAD LCS participants will be recruited from different types of
existing PCs across Europe (e.g. memory clinic-based, population-based) to
ensure fast recruitment of a probability-spectrum population covering the
entire continuum of probability for AD dementia development.
Study burden and risks
- We ask a time investment: On estimation 8 hours for the screening/annual
visits and 2,5 hours for the visit after 6 months.
- Venipuncture: Can hurt and there is a small chance of hemorrhaging.
- Lumbar puncture : Discomfort during the procedure and less than 10% of the
people get a light headache afterwards for a few days.
- MRI scan: During the MRI the participant can experience discomfort because of
the loud noise and discomfort lying down. Also the participant can get
frightened when they are suffering from claustrophobia.
The participants will not receive any direct compensation for participating in
the EPAD LCS. They do however give a contribution to science with the goal to
diagnose and treat Alzheimer's disease in an earlier stage.
If the participants would appreciate to receive blood results (e.g. cholesterol
or blood sugar values), we can provide these to them.
The Queens Medical Research Institute 47 Little France Cresecent
Edinburgh EH16 4TJ
GB
The Queens Medical Research Institute 47 Little France Cresecent
Edinburgh EH16 4TJ
GB
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
• Age at least 50 years, checked and recorded at screening (Visit 1) only.
• Fulfils the criteria set by the Balancing Committee [BC]
• Able to read and write and with minimum 5 years of formal education, checked
and recorded at screening (Visit 1) only.
• Willing in principle to participate in the EPAD PoC trial subject to further
informed consent
• Have a study partner or can identify someone willing in principle to be a
study partner
Exclusion criteria
• Research participants who fulfil diagnostic criteria for any type of dementia
(e.g. National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke
and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association [NINCDS-ADRDA] for
AD; Lund Criteria for fronto-temporal dementia [FTD], McKeith Criteria for
dementia with Lewy bodies [DLB], National Institute of Neurological Disorders
and Stroke and Association Internationale pour la Recherché et l'Enseignement
en Neurosciences [NINCDS-AIREN] Criteria for Vascular Dementia)
• CDR >=>=1 at screening (Visit 1)
• Known carriers of a Presenilin (PSEN) PSEN1, PSEN2 or APP mutation associated
with Autosomal Dominant AD or any other neurodegenerative disease
• Presence of any neurological, psychiatric or medical conditions associated
with a long-term risk of significant cognitive impairment or dementia including
but not limited to pre-manifest Huntington*s disease, multiple sclerosis,
Parkinson*s disease, Down syndrome, active alcohol/drug abuse or major
psychiatric disorders including current major depressive disorder,
schizophrenia, schizoaffective or bipolar disorder.
• Any cancer or history of cancer in the preceding 5 years (excluding cutaneous
basal or squamous cell cancer resolved by excision and localised prostate
cancer in male subjects)
• Any current medical conditions that are clinically significant and might make
the subject*s participation in an investigational trial unsafe, e.g.,
uncontrolled or unstable disease of any major organ system; history within the
last 6 months of any acute illness of a major organ system requiring emergency
care or hospitalization, including re-vascularisation procedures; severe renal
or hepatic failure; unstable or poorly controlled diabetesdiabetes mellitus,
hypertension, or heart failure; malignant neoplasms within the last 5 years
(except for basal or squamous cell carcinoma in situ of the skin, or localized
prostate cancer in male subjects); any clinically relevant abnormalities in
blood parameters included in local Trial Delivery CentreCentre routine
assessments; severe loss of vision, hearing or communicative ability; or any
conditions preventing co-operation or completion of the required assessments in
the trial, as judged by the investigator
• Any contraindications for MRI/positron emission tomography (PET) scan
• Any contraindications for Lumbar Puncture at visit 1.
• Any evidence of intracranial pathology which, in the opinion of the
Investigator, may affect cognition, including but not limited to brain tumours
(benign or malignant), aneurysm or arteriovenous malformations, territorial
stroke (excluding smaller watershed strokes), recent haemorrhage (parenchymal
or subdural), or obstructive hydrocephalus. Participants with a MRI scan
demonstrating markers of small vessel disease (e.g. white matter changes or
lacunar infarcts) judged to be clinically insignificant, or microbleeds are
allowed.
• Participation in a clinical trial of an investigational product (CTIMP) in
the last 30 days . Participation in a non-CTIMP or an observational arm of a
CTIMP is not considered an exclusion criterion. Co-enrolment in the Amyloid
Imaging to Prevent Alzheimer*s Disease (AMYPAD) Prognostic and Natural History
Study (PNHS) is not considered to fall under this exclusion criteria.
• Diminished decision-making capacity/not capable of consenting at screening
visit
• Unable to comply with protocol requirements in the opinion of the
investigator
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL56399.029.16 |