This study is designed to clarify how hearing ability and other individual differences influence the preference for a specific noise reduction strength. We will concentrate on the trade-off between residual noise and speech distortion * which is…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Hearing disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The main outcome measure is preference for different degrees of noise
reduction.
Secondary outcome
ANL
SRT
Speech intelligibility
Self-adjusted preference for amount of gain reduction
APHAB (abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit, questionnaire)
Background summary
One of the main reasons for hearing aid dissatisfaction is the inability to
hear well in noisy environments. For that reason, most hearing aids currently
marketed have a noise reduction algorithm that should make listening in noisy
environments less effortful and more comfortable. It is known that stronger
noise reduction is accompanied with a degradation of speech quality and
therefore it is important to find a balance between the two. Available
research on the perceptual effects of noise reduction concentrates on group
results, not taking fully into account the possible influences of hearing loss
and of differences between individuals. The aim of this research is to improve
rehabilitation by optimizing noise reduction for an individual hearing aid
user. To achieve this we will focus on individual preferences for the trade-off
of two major aspects of noise reduction, namely the amount of residual noise
and the speech distortion caused by the noise reduction algorithm.
Study objective
This study is designed to clarify how hearing ability and other individual
differences influence the preference for a specific noise reduction strength.
We will concentrate on the trade-off between residual noise and speech
distortion * which is inherent in noise reduction * to systematically study
listeners* preference.
Study design
This study is observational in which several listening test will be performed.
The entire visit will last approximately 2.5 hours. The listening tests consist
out of an ANL test, an SRT test and a speech intelligibility rating. Also,
listener preference for the strength of noise reduction will be determined with
a paired comparison experiment.
Study burden and risks
Since this study is observational, the burden for the patients is minimal.
Several tests similar or equal to those done in standard clinical practice will
be done during the visit. This study forms an important step towards the goal
of being able to tailor the noise reduction to the personal requirements and
preferences of an individual user. Furthermore, it provides an essential base
for further research into the effects of noise reduction in hearing aids.
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1105 AZ
NL
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1105 AZ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Aged between 18-75 years old
Dutch native speakers
No reports of tinnitus
Mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss
Exclusion criteria
If the subject for whichever reason cannot participate in the test. Examples include problems with sight or concentration.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL68444.018.18 |