This study aims to phenotype and endotype bronchiectasis during stable disease and exacerbations, to develop strategies for personalised medicine.3.1 Primary ObjectiveTo determine molecular endotypes of bronchiectasis which can guide response to…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Bronchial disorders (excl neoplasms)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
- Medical history
- Height/ weight
- Spirometry outcome measures (FEV1, FVC, tiffenau)
- Results from the bronchiectasis quality of life questionnaire (Qol-B) and
bronchiectasis health questionnaire (BHQ)
- Sputumcultures for microbiological examination and neutrophil elastase
testing*
- Laboratory testing**
- alpha-1-antitrypsin levels and genotyping. Note that if the patient has
previously been tested for alpha-1 antitrypsin levels and this is documented,
there is no requirement to perform this further test.
- Urine and nasopharynx micribioma results
** Laboratory procedures may include the following*:
1. Protein proteomic analysis using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
2. qPCR to evaluate bacterial and viral load
3. Assays for inflammatory profiling such as ELISA for cytokine/ chemokine
measurement, including neutrophil markers (elastase, resistin, OLF4), alpha 1
anti-trypsin, pH and other candidate markers.
4. Microbiome assessment by 16s rRNA amplicon sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq
platform for bacteria and ITS sequencing for Fungi
5. Assessment of gene expression
6. Cell culture and subsequent sampling of culture supernatant for cell products
7. Challenge of cells with micro-organisms, environmental pollutants and
pharmaceutical agents
8. Assessment of neutrophil function
9. Genotyping (including whole genome sequencing)
* Not all of the laboratory procedures will be conducted on all of the samples.
Procedures will be performed centrally; no additional testing; materials will
be shipped to the primary trial lab at the University of Dundee.
Secondary outcome
-
Background summary
Bronchiectasis has been described as one of the most neglected diseases in
respiratory medicine.(1,2) There are no licensed treatments, and the burden of
disease is high and increasing. In the UK, bronchiectasis affects 485 per
100,000 men and 566 per 100,000 women and the prevalence has increased by
approximately 40% in the past decade.(3) Traditional bronchiectasis guideline
approaches to treatment are focussed on airway infection (long term
oral/inhaled antibiotic treatments), mucus clearance (physiotherapy, devices,
mucoactive drugs) and airway inflammation (inhaled corticosteroids,
macrolides).(1) Clinical trials have failed to demonstrate clear benefit of
inhaled antibiotics across multiple compounds.(4-6) Macrolides reduced the
frequency of exacerbations in 3 randomized trials, but up to 40% of patients do
not respond to treatment in practice.(7-10) Mucoactive drugs are not widely
used and clinical trials of mannitol have failed to meet their primary
end-points, DNAse was found to be harmful in bronchiectasis despite benefits in
cystic fibrosis, while hypertonic saline has not shown clear benefits over 0.9%
saline.(11-14) A Cochrane review concluded that there is insufficient evidence
to support the use of inhaled corticosteroids.(15) The failure of therapies to
translate from cystic fibrosis to bronchiectasis is thought to be due to the
greater inflammatory, microbiological, radiological and aetiological
heterogeneity in bronchiectasis.(16)
Achieving success in developing new therapies for this disease requires
detailed translational research to define patient phenotypes and endotypes.
Personalised, stratified or precision medicine is increasing advocated across a
range of conditions to improve targeting of therapies.(17-20).
Study objective
This study aims to phenotype and endotype bronchiectasis during stable disease
and exacerbations, to develop strategies for personalised medicine.
3.1 Primary Objective
To determine molecular endotypes of bronchiectasis which can guide response to
treatment.
3.2 Secondary Objectives
1. To determine molecular endotypes of stable bronchiectasis
2. To determine the causes and inflammatory profiles of bronchiectasis
exacerbations
3. To validate candidate biomarkers of stable and exacerbation endotypes to use
in stratified medicine
4. To perform in-vivo or in-vitro proof of concept studies using phenotypic
data to identify patient populations likely to benefit in future randomized
controlled trials
Study design
This is an observational, multi-centre study performed through the EMBARC
consortium. Data and samples will be collected from approximately 8 European
centres. Ethical approval of this protocol will be sought at country level.
The Dutch study site will aim to recruit 80 patients over the course of the
study with 1000 recruited Europe-wide. These numbers are indicative and we
reserve the right to recruit more or less patients in the Netherlands and
elsewhere according to study need. Patients will be recruited whilst clinically
stable and asked to attend an annual visit at a clinical research facility for
the research procedures outlined below.
Study burden and risks
This study is observational and no interventional product or device will be
adminstered. The majority of study procedures are part of the routine follow up
of bronchiectasis patients in our hospital and thus will not provide additional
risks and/ or burden for participants.
Therefore, the participant's burden consists of the extra time needed for:
- quality of life questionnaires
- blood/ urine sampling
- naso-pharyngeal swabs
The risks for participants are limited to the risks knowing to be involved in
venapunction (hematoma, mild pijn, infection of puncture site).
James Arrott Drive 1
Dundee DD1 9SY
GB
James Arrott Drive 1
Dundee DD1 9SY
GB
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
A previous CT scan showing bronchiectasis along with compatible clinical
syndrome of cough, sputum production and/or recurrent respiratory tract
infections.
A primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis made by a respiratory physician
At the screening visit the individual will have been clinically stable for 4
weeks indicated by the lack of any treatment with antibiotics or
corticosteroids for a pulmonary exacerbation in the previous 4 weeks.
Exclusion criteria
Inability to give informed consent
<18years of age
Patients with active tuberculosis
Treatment with antibiotics or corticosteroids for a pulmonary exacerbation in
the previous 4 weeks
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT03791086 |
CCMO | NL69656.018.19 |