Primary objective: To determine if beam walking performance vis-à-vis the traditionally used balance outcomes predicts more accurately fall risks and falls.Secondary objectives: To determine: 1. Reliability and 2. Lifespan and patient reference…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
healthy aging
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
- Physical Activity
- Fall History
- Falls efficacy scale-international (FES-I)
- Balance confidence
- Differentiation between fallers and non-fallers
- Mobility (SPPB)
- Static steady-state balance
- Proactive (anticipatory) balance
- Dynamic Balance (beam)
- Upper extremity strength
- Lower extremity strength
- Global cognition
- Attention and executive function
- Processing speed and intelligence fluidity
- Verbal and visual memory span and working memory
Secondary outcome
N.A.
Background summary
Gait, balance, and muscle impairments are associated with falls in ~30% and
~50% of adults age over 65 and 80, respectively. Nearly 50% of outdoor falls
occur while walking. Measuring dynamic balance is thus important to
characterize the current state of postural control and identify those who are
likely to experience severe levels of mobility disability, including falls in
the future. To date, dynamic balance has been inferred from *functional tests*
that rely mostly on gait speed and fail to quantify an actual balance loss
while walking. Beam walking could measure dynamic balance more accurately.
Study objective
Primary objective: To determine if beam walking performance vis-à-vis the
traditionally used balance outcomes predicts more accurately fall risks and
falls.
Secondary objectives: To determine: 1. Reliability and 2. Lifespan and patient
reference values for dynamic balance as determined by beam walking with and
without cognitive dual-tasking, and 3. The statistical relationship between
beam walking performance and selected *functional tests* currently used to
measure dynamic balance.
Study design
This observational, cross-sectional study contains of a session wherein
participants are asked to fill in a few questionnaires, perform tasks of daily
living (static balance test, standing up from a chair, 3 meter walk), walk on a
beam, and perform cognitive tests. 3 to 7 days after this first session a
second session will be done where only beam walking will be performed. All
participants age 50+ will report fall history at test 1 and at 6 and 12 months
follow-ups.
Study burden and risks
The participants will visit the Central of Human Movement Sciences once. They
will be asked to fill in questionnaires, perform tasks of daily living + walk
on a beam, and perform cognitive tasks. The risks are minimal and not bigger
than in daily life. The participants are allowed to take a break between the
measurements if necessary.
Antonius Deusinglaan 1
groninggen 9700AD
NL
Antonius Deusinglaan 1
groninggen 9700AD
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
In this research, male and female volunteers aged over 20 will have good health, balance and mobility.
Exclusion criteria
Positive answers to any of the following questions results in exclusion from the study:
- unable to walk 10m independently
- knee or hip joint replacements * 6 months before enrollment
- uncontrolled cardiovascular disease or angina
- neuromuscular disease
- diagnosed Parkinson*s Disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS) or stroke
- cancer therapy * 3 months before enrollment
- severe asthma or chronic bronchitis
- diagnosed diabetes with neuropathy
- poor and uncorrected vision
- score * 27 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
- score * 10 for mobility in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT03532984 |
CCMO | NL68666.042.19 |