To assess the functional outcomes and cost-effectiveness of K-wire fixation followed by direct mobilization versus open reposition and internal fixation with direct mobilization in adult patients with unstable shaft fractures and fractures with a…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
- Fractures
- Bone and joint therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Health condition
pees, - ligamentair letsel
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Function, pain and disability expressed as change during the first 3 months on
the Michigan Hand Questionnaire Score (MHQ-DLV) measured at randomization and
one, four weeks and 3 months post-operative The MHQ is a validated tool for
assessing functional outcome in patients with complaints of the hand5,8. The
MHQ is a questionnaire divided in six subscales; overall hand function,
activities of daily living (ADLs), pain, work performance, aesthetics and
patient satisfaction with hand function. Each subscale has a formula to
calculate a score from 0 (severe disability) to 100 (no disability). The final
score is a summation of the six individual item-scores divided by six and
ranges from 0 (severe disability) to 100 (no disability).
Secondary outcome
- Function, pain and disability expressed on the Michigan Hand Questionnaire
Score (MHQ). Therefore MHQ-score will be measured at twelve months
post-operative.
- Disability, expressed on Patient Specific Functional and pain Scales (PSFS)
at randomization and one, four weeks, three, twelve months post-operative. 9.
The PSFS is a list of 3-5 self-chosen activities, scored from 0 (difficult to
preform activity) to 10 (no difficulty to preform activity). The final score
goes from 0 (severe difficulty) tot 10 (no difficulty) and is a summation of
the activity scores divided by the number of activities.
- Health literacy; the ability of an individual to access, understand, and use
health-related information and services to make appropriate health decisions,
with the Newest Vital Sign- Dutch langue version (NVS-D)10. The NVS-D is a
6-item questionnaire where a score of 4 or more right answers distinguish
individuals with adequate versus inadequate health literacy. The NVS-D will be
measured ones, an out-patient clinic appointment, preferably at randomization.
- Overall patient satisfaction (of the injury of the hand), on Visual Analogue
Satisfaction Scale, scored from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (completely
satisfied), measured at randomization and one, four weeks, three, six and
twelve months post-operative. - Overall patient satisfaction (of the injury of
the hand), on a 5 point scale from -2 (very dissatisfied) to +2 (completely
satisfied) measured at randomization and one, four weeks, three, six and twelve
months post-operative.
- Patient satisfaction about improvement of function of the finger between the
operation and three months with the Visual Analogue Satisfaction Scale, scored
from 0 (very dissatisfied) -to 10 (completely satisfied), measured at three
months and patient satisfaction about improvement of function of the finger
between three months and twelve months with the Visual Analogue Satisfaction
Scale, scored from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied),
measured at twelve months.
- Patient satisfaction about improvement of function of the finger between
operation and three months on a 5 point scale from -2 (no improvement) to +2
(completely improved), measured at three and patient satisfaction of
improvement of function of the finger between three and twelve months on a 5
point scale from -2 (no improvement) to +2 (completely improved), measured at
twelve months.
- Patient satisfaction about improvement of pain of the finger between
operation and 3 months on a 5 point scale from -2 (no improvement) to +2
(completely improved), measured at three months and patient satisfaction of
improvement of pain of the finger between three and twelve months on a 5 point
scale from -2 (no improvement) to +2 (completely improved), measured at twelve
months.
- Patient satisfaction on improvement of disability of the finger between
operation and 3 months on a 5 point scale from -2 (no improvement) to- +2
(completely improved), measured at three months and patient satisfaction on
improvement of disability of the finger between three and twelve months on a 5
point scale from -2 (no improvement) to +2 (completely improved), measured at
twelve months.
- Patient satisfaction on aesthetics of the finger over the last 3 months on a
5 point scale from -2 (no improvement) to +2 (completely improved), measured at
three months and patient satisfaction on aesthetics of the finger between three
and twelve months on a 5 point scale from -2 (no improvement) to +2 (completely
improved), measured at twelve months.
- Patient satisfaction on work performance over the last 3 months on a 5 point
scale from -2 (no improvement) to +2 (completely improved), measured at three
months and patient satisfaction on work performance between three and twelve
months on a 5 point scale from -2 (no improvement) to +2 (completely improved),
measured at twelve months.
- Overall satisfaction of the finger over the last 3 months on a 5 point scale
from -2 (no improvement) to +2 (completely improved), measured at three months
and overall satisfaction of the finger between three and twelve months on a 5
point scale from -2 (no improvement) to +2 (completely improved), measured at
twelve months.
- Pain as indicated on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 implies no pain
and 10 the worst possible pain, measured at randomization and one, four weeks,
three, six and twelve months post-operative.
- Patient-expectation; Pre-consultation expectation of the patient on recovery
and post-consultation achievement of this expectation. At the first outpatient
clinic visit (at randomization) patients will be asked what they expect to
achieve in degree of improvement and restriction at a five-point scale; 1. No
improvement, full restriction; 2. Slight improvement, serious restriction; 3.
Moderate improvement, moderate restriction; 4. Substantial improvement, slight
restriction; 5. Complete improvement, no restriction.
At the last outpatient clinic visit (in general at three months) patients will
be asked to re-answer this question. Achievement of expectation is expressed as
the difference between their answer of the pre-and -post consultation
questions. At twelve months patients will be asked to re-answer this question.
Achievement of expectation is expressed as the difference between their answer
of the pre consultation question and end of the study question.
- Total active motion (TAM) = Active Range Of Motion of the
metacarpal-phalangeal joint, the proximal interphalangeal joint and the distal
interphalangeal joint minus any extension deficits. TAM is measured at
randomization and one, four weeks and three months post-operative11.
Range of motion (ROM) of the wrist measured on both sides with a handheld
goniometer. ROM includes pronation and supination, ulnar and radial deviation
and palmar and dorsal flexion of the wrist. ROM is measured at randomization
and one, four weeks and three months postoperative.
- Health care costs, productivity losses and out-of-pocket expenses with the
adapted Dutch iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire and iMTA Productivity Cost
Questionnaire (see economic evaluation below), measured at four weeks, three,
six and twelve months post-operative.
- Measurement of health status with the EQ-5D-5L at randomization and four
weeks, three, six and twelve months post-operative. This questionnaire consists
of 5 items, measuring (at 5-point scales) whether patients experience problems,
and if so, to what extent with regard to mobility, self-care, daily activities,
pain/complaints, and mood.
- Health utility and quality adjusted life-years
- Complications
Background summary
Twenty-two percent of hand fractures are fractures of the proximal phalanx
(P1). Unstable shaft fractures and fractures with a symptomatic rotational or
angular deformity require operative treatment. Multiple techniques have been
described in literature. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or closed
reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation are most commonly used. ORIF leads
to more rigid fixation of the bone which guarantees anatomic reduction and
direct mobilization. However ORIF is a more invasive and may lead to plate
removal, stiffness, longer work-absence and concomitant higher healthcare
costs, compared to k-wire fixation. Closed reduction and percutaneous K-wire
fixation is a less invasive and cheaper. Usually the PIP and MCP joints are
immobilized following K-wire fixation which may lead to stiffness. However
some authors support functional treatment though qualitative focused studies
are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare K-wire fixation
with direct mobilization vs ORIF with direct mobilization in patients with
unstable shaft fractures and fractures with a symptomatic rotational or angular
deformity requiring operative treatment. The primary and secondary outcomes
are functional outcome and cost-effectiveness..
Study objective
To assess the functional outcomes and cost-effectiveness of K-wire fixation
followed by direct mobilization versus open reposition and internal fixation
with direct mobilization in adult patients with unstable shaft fractures and
fractures with a symptomatic rotational or angular deformity requiring
operative treatment.
Study design
Multicentre randomized clinical superiority cost-effectiveness trial comparing
K-wire fixation with direct mobilization with ORIF. Study inclusion period 1.5
years
Intervention
The intervention group will be treated with K-wire fixation in combination with
direct post-operative mobilization, supervised by the hand physiotherapist.
Surgery will be performed by a certified trauma surgeon, with experience in
hand surgery. Patients will be operated within 14 days after trauma. According
to the current standard, antibiotic prophylaxis (Cefazoline, 1000-2000
milligram intravenous) will be administered thirty minutes preoperatively.
Closed reduction will be performed using fluoroscopy. When perfect reduction is
achieved, K-wires are inserted through the dorsal proximal phalangeal base,
crossing the fracture site, and purchasing the cortex of the distal fragment.
In the ideal situation the K wires will not cross at the fracture site. Oblique
fractures may be treated with parallel K -wires. Post-operatively a
compression bandage will be applied for 48 hours. The metacarpal phalangeal
joint and the proximal interphalangeal joint will not be immobilized by cast or
brace. The K-wires will be removed 4 weeks after surgery.
The control group will be treated with open reduction and internal fixation
with plates or lag screws and direct post-operative mobilization, supervised by
the hand physiotherapist. Patients will be operated in within 14 days after
trauma. According to the current standard, antibiotic prophylaxis (Cefazoline,
1000-2000 milligram intravenous) will be administered thirty minutes
preoperatively. The approach may be either a dorsal approach or lateral
approach according to the surgeon*s preference. After the fracture site is
exposed, the fracture will be reduced. Fixation will be performed with
lag-screws or plate fixation depending on surgeons preference. The type and
brand of the plate are at discretion of the treating surgeon. Post-operatively
a compression bandage will be applied for 48 hours post-operative. The
metacarpal phalangeal joint and the proximal interphalangeal joint will not be
immobilized by cast or brace. If there are no indications for removing the
material, it will remain in place.
Study burden and risks
Both treatment modalities are standard care. The treatment of choice is
currently based on surgeon*s preference. Out-patient clinic visits are within
one week (randomization), within 10 days after trauma (operation day) and
postoperative; one week(wound control), four weeks (if necessary k-wire
removal) and three months.. All visits are standard care in case of operative
treatment of proximal phalangeal shaft fractures. During the visits patients
will be asked if there are any complaints and/or complications. Physical
examination like assessment of the range of motion of the hand and wrist will
be executed. Additional to standard care, questionnaires are received at
randomization and one, four weeks and three, six and twelve months after
operation. Questionnaires can be filled out at home at all times, no additional
out-patient clinic visits are necessary for the questionnaires. Patients are
asked to fill out MHQ, PSFS, EQ-5D-5L,the Visual Analogue Pain Scale, Visual
Analogue Satisfaction scale and 5-point satisfaction scores. Additionally, a
questionnaire on any use of health care, health related expenses and absence
from work will be administered and patients will be asked to fill out the NVS-D
once. Subjects could experience mild discomfort during physical examination and
testing, but this will be no different than physical examination during routine
follow-up. The burden experienced regarding time spent on questionnaires is
difficult to estimate but will most likely <2hours minutes in the total
follow-up duration of this study (1 year).
Maasstadweg 21
Rotterdam 3079 DZ
NL
Maasstadweg 21
Rotterdam 3079 DZ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
a. Population (base)
- All adult patients with unstable shaft fractures and fractures with a
symptomatic rotational or angular deformity of the proximal phalanx requiring
operative treatment.
b. Inclusion criteria
- Patients >=18 years
- Single proximal phalangeal shaft fracture
- Unstable proximal phalangeal shaft (extra-articular) fracture requiring
operative treatment. Unstable is defined as:
o transverse of oblique fractures with rotational disorders
o scissoring fingers in flexion
o dislocation or re-dislocation (after closed reduction) in a cast:
* >2mm shortening
* >2mm translocation
* >25 degrees angulation
- All comminuted proximal phalangeal fractures
- All proximal phalangeal fractures (regardless exact dislocation measures)
resulting in swan neck-deformity, pseudo claw hand, shortening with extension
lag.
- Proximal phalangeal fractures with acceptable reduction at the ED,
re-dislocated within 1 week after the ED (evaluated by radiograph at the
out-patient clinic)
Exclusion criteria
c. Exclusion criteria
- - Stable proximal phalangeal shaft (extra-articular) fracture requiring
conservative treatment. Stable is defined as:
o transverse of oblique fractures without rotational disorders
o no scissoring fingers in flexion
o no dislocation or re-dislocation (after closed reduction) in a cast:
* <2mm shortening,
* <2mm translocation
* <25 degrees angulation
- Proximal phalangeal fractures with acceptable reduction at the ED (evaluated
with a radiograph at the ED) without re-dislocation within 1 week (evaluated by
a radiograph within 1 week at the out-patient clinic) requiring conservative
treatment.
- Proximal phalangeal shaft fracture of the thumb.
- Open fractures
- Multiple proximal phalangeal fractures
- Patients with impaired hand function prior to injury due to
arthrosis/neurological disorders of the upper limb
- Multiple trauma patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS) >=16)
- Other injuries in the ipsilateral extremity
- Insufficient comprehension of the Dutch language to understand a
rehabilitation program and other treatment information as judged by the
attending physician
- Patient suffering from disorders of bone metabolism other than osteoporosis
(i.e. Paget*s disease, renal osteodystrophy, osteomalacia)
- Patients suffering from connective tissue disease or (joint)
hyper-flexibility disorders such as Marfan*s, Ehler Danlos or other related
disorders.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL70118.100.19 |