To quantify clinical and histological improvements in patients with vulvar lichen sclerosus after treatment with SVF enriched lipofilling.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Epidermal and dermal conditions
- Skin and subcutaneous tissue therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary objective of this study is to perform a pilot-study on the efficacy
and safety of autologous injections of SVF enriched lipoaspirate for the
treatment of therapy-resistant vulvar lichen sclerosus. Efficacy is determined
by the quantification of improvement in patient*s symptoms by improvement in
quality-of-life and sexual functioning three months, six months and one year
after injection of SVF enriched lipoaspirate. Quality of life is evaluated
using the validated Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and resumption of
sexual activity and quality of sexual functioning is evaluated using the
validated Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).
Secondary outcome
Secondary objective is the quantification of improvements in clinical signs and
architectural changes by physical examination findings and improvements of
histopathological parameters.
To date, no agreed-on standard exists to measure lichen sclerosus disease
severity for use in clinical practice or research trials. For this pilot study
we developed a non standardized severity scale, based on the preliminary
outcomes of an international expert consensus exercise for item generation for
the development of a future adult vulvar lichen sclerosus severity scale. Each
parameter is scored by a five point Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale
for severity of disease (0=clear; 1=minimal disease; 2=mild disease; 3=moderate
disease; 4=severe disease)
Clinical signs in lichen sclerosus include parameters on extent of disease,
erosions, excoriations or ulcerations, white lesions, hyperkeratosis,,
lichenification, (loss of) elasticity and sclerosis. Architectural changes
include caliber and elasticity of vaginal introitus (narrowing of introitus),
clitoris burying degree (clitoral hood fusion), labial resorption/fusion,
fusion below the clitoris,(urethral occlusion), posterior commisure bands
(fourchette webs).
In order to reduce observer bias, standardised digital photographs are made
before and at three months, six months and one year after SVF enriched
lipofilling treatment. These digital registrations will be assessed by a panel
of three independent expert consultant gynaecologists from the University
Medical Center Groningen, whom are blinded-for-time before and after treatment.
To compare histological modi*cations of the vulvar skin before and after
injection of SVF enriched lipofilling and assess the mechanism of SVF enriched
lipofilling therapy, biopsies are taken at three times on the same locations of
the perivulvar area: pre-operative (lichen sclerosus affected vulvar skin), 3
months postoperative and 1 year postoperative. Histological parameters of
lichen sclerosus are evaluated by an expert pathologist. Using routine
Hematoxylin-Eosin and Masson*s Trichrome staining, epidermal atrophy,
hyperkeratosis, dermo-epidermal detachment, dermal inflammation, dermal
homogenization (fibrosis), presence of edema and presence of large caliber
vessels in the superficial dermis are stained. Additionally,
immunohistochemical analyses will be performed to quantify vascularisation,
tissue regeneration and visualize immune cell influx.
To elucidate on the molecular mechanism of regeneration, the Luminex multiplex
ELISA technique will be applied in one biopsy for every patient. Multiplex
ELISA can quantify up to 30 cytokines from a single sample. In biopsies from
lichen sclerosus patients, we will assess the tissue level of the immunorelated
cytokines and regenerative factors.
Background summary
Lichen sclerosis (LS) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis with a high
prevalence in the genital area in peri- or postmenopausal women. Shame and
ignorance often result in late reporting and hesitation to seek help. Vulvar LS
presents with progressive pruritus and pain, sexual and urinary dysfunction,
reduced quality of life and an increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the
vulva.The lifetime risk for women with LS to develop vulvar squamous cell
carcinoma is estimated at 5%. In patients treated for vulvar cancer, the
presence of LS appears to affect the incidence of recurrence of squamous cell
carcinoma. The true prevalence of LS is not known; estimates range from 1 in 30
elderly women and 1 in 59 women in a general gynecology practice. A Dutch
historical cohort of 3038 woman indicates an increase of nearly 100% in the
incidence of LS from 7.4 to 14.6 per 100,000 woman-years between 1991 and 2011.
LS typically begins as white, polygonal papules that coalesce into shiny
porcelain-white plaques involving the perivaginal and perianal areas. Vulvar LS
may progress to obliteration of the labia minora and stenosis of the introitus.
Diagnosis is often made on clinical appearance. Punch biopsy, followed by
histological examination is the golden standard to confirm the diagnosis. The
etiology and pathogenesis of LS are largely unknown and may include genetic,
auto-immune, infectious, environmental and hormonal factors. Inflammation and
fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in the papillary dermis
culminate in fibrogenesis in the upper dermis. Histological examinations of
classic LS indicate epidermal atrophy, a typical band-like lympho-histiocytic
infiltrate in the dermo-epidermal junction and compact hyperkeratosis with
stratum corneum, which often is thicker than the greatly effaced epidermis. In
time, edema in the papillary (upper) dermis is replaced by a dense, homogenous
fibrotic tissue as the lesion matures. Histopathological findings of LS tissue
include the occurrence of tissue hypoxia and ischemia, followed by inflammatory
processes (T-cell infiltration and TH1-cytokine accumulation in the tissue),
resulting in epithelial damage (reduced CD44 expression) and fibrogenesis
(accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins and hyaluronic acid).
The preferred treatment for genital LS are very potent topical corticosteroids
(e.g., clobetasol propionate), which may relief clinical symptoms (pruritus and
pain) and reduce clinical indicators on physical examination (i.e. ulceration,
hyperkeratosis, erythema, ecchymosis, atrophy and depigmentation). Although
randomized trials that compare therapies for vulval LS are elusive, several
other topical therapeutic options have been proposed (e.g. topical testosterone
or progesterone), but proven not to be effective. In case of
treatment-resistant LS, topical treatment with tacrolimus or pimecrolimus
(inhibition of T-cell activation) can be considered, but evidence on its
effectiveness is sparse. Tissue fibrosis and its associated disfigurement often
cannot be prevented by topical treatment and result in persistent sexual and
urinary dysfunction and reduction in quality of life. A surgical approach is
only considered in severe vaginal introitus stenosis, urinary retention, and
synechiae, yet surgery creates scars and is characterized by a high recurrence
rate of the original pathology.
Transfer of adipose tissue, also known as lipofilling, is recognized as a
promising and novel technique for the treatment of a range of pathologies. This
is strongly supported by clinical trials as well as more fundamental studies in
preclinical models. The white adipose tissue harbors a mesenchymal cell
population with stem cell-like properties, which holds regenerative as well as
angiogenetic, immunomodulatory and differentiative potential. These
regenerative cells can be isolated from the adipose tissue through standard
lipofilling procedures, after which the lipograft is fractionated using
mechanical dissociation and subsequent isolation of Stromal Vascular Fraction
(SVF) using density centrifugation. The advantage of the use of SVF is believed
to be in two areas. Firstly, the so-called FAT-SVF procedure (Fractionation of
Adipose Tissue to obtain Stromal Vascular Fraction with harvesting, processing
and injection of the therapeutic product) can all be executed in a short *one
stop* procedure in day surgery. Additionally, the distinctive heterogeneous
cellular composition of SVF may be responsible for better therapeutic outcomes
observed in comparative pre-clinicall studies. Cells from the SVF are currently
used for many medical indications: burns sequelae, radiotherapy tissue damage,
reconstruction after oncological surgery, improvement of facial nerve function,
the experimental treatment of ischaemic cardiomyopathy and intervertebrate disc
regeneration.
To reduce fibrogenesis and adverse tissue remodeling in vulvar LS, pioneering
studies have used lipofilling to treat women with therapy-resistant LS. In 2010
Casabona et al. proposed lipofilling in combination with injection of Platelet
Rich Plasma (PRP) for the treatment of LS and reported favorable outcomes. A
later study by Boero et al used lipofilling solely for the treatment of
therapy-resistant LS. Vulvar tropism of the skin and mucosa improved in 34 out
of 36 women (94%) and the routine usage of topical corticosteroids was stopped
in 34 out of 36 women. More importantly, the quality-of-life and sexual
functioning were improved as assessed by the validated DLQI and FSFI
questionnaires. In addition, several small studies have evaluated the efficacy
of lipofilling in the treatment of severe vulvar LS, confirming the reduction
of symptoms, increased quality-of-life and increased sexual functioning without
any report of adverse events. Hence, lipofilling might represent a promising
alternative for current topical corticosteroid treatment in LS. Although
clinical improvements have been reported from these studies, limitations should
be mentioned: small sample sizes, short follow up period (maximum of two
years) and no analysis included on the mechanism of regeneration of sclerosis
at tissue levels.
Study objective
To quantify clinical and histological improvements in patients with vulvar
lichen sclerosus after treatment with SVF enriched lipofilling.
Study design
A prospective pilot study.
Intervention
All patients will receive autologous SVF enriched lipoaspirate: 20 ml of
lipoaspirate will be added to 2 ml of SVF resulting in a total of 22 ml of SVF
enriched aspirate to be injected in the vulvar region (with 0,1 ml of volume
for every 0,1 cm2 epithelium).
Study burden and risks
To-date, only minor complications have been noticed when performing
lipoharvesting: swelling of the harvesting site, neuropraxy due to collision of
the cannula against a sensible nerve and hypersensitivity of harvesting site.
There is a very low risk of fatembolism and risks related to the anaestetic
procedure.
Hanzeplein 1
Groningen 9713GZ
NL
Hanzeplein 1
Groningen 9713GZ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Postmenopausal women up to 80 years with ASA Physical Status Classification 0-1
- Histopathological confirmed diagnosis of lichen sclerosus
- Moderate or severe lichen sclerosus (IGA scale 3 or 4), therapy resistant to conventional therapy with highly potent topical steroids (insufficient reduction in clinical symptoms and signs having used topical steroids for 6 months).
Exclusion criteria
- Women with history of vulvar cancer or vulva intraepitheliale neoplasie (VIN) in addition to lichen sclerosus
- An oncological event in the patient*s history < 5 years ago.
- A known systemic disease that will impair wound healing (e.g. diabetes mellitus type I, known atherosclerosis with an event that required hospitalization, collagen diseases, diseases of the skin, HIV).
- Systematic use of prednisone or other immunotherapy
- Use of anticoagulant therapy
- Smoking
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL65403.000.18 |
OMON | NL-OMON23776 |