The objective of this study is to determine the safe and efficacious dose required to eradicate LGD or HGD in BE, or residual BE after endoscopic removal of early cancer (*therapeutic dose*), using the C2 CryoBalloon 180 Ablation System. *Dose* is…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Malignant and unspecified neoplasms gastrointestinal NEC
- Gastrointestinal neoplasms malignant and unspecified
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
* Feasibility, defined as the number of procedures with treatment success (all
BE treated as intended by the endoscopist)
* Safety will be evaluated by the incidence of Dose-related SAEs. Dose-related
SAEs include pain in the treatment area greater than 6 (0-10 VAS score) at 24
hours AND 7 days post-treatment; symptomatic stricture requiring an additional
EGD plus endoscopic dilation before first follow-up EGD; symptomatic stricture
requiring endoscopic dilation at follow-up EGD; or any stricture (symptomatic
or asymptomatic) preventing passage of the diagnostic endoscope at follow-up
EGD. Any other serious adverse events within 30 days after treatment will be
evaluated by DSMB for relationship to the dose and severity.
* Dose response (efficacy) is defined as eradication percentage of BE confirmed
by histological evidence of eradication of BE, after circumferential treatment
with the therapeutic dose (phase II). The eradication percentage will be
assessed by the EGD-Adjudication Committee (EGD-AC), consisting of three
physicians specialized in gastroenterology, by comparing pre-treatment and
follow-up digital images of the ablated areas in a systematic and standardized
manner.
Secondary outcome
1. Post-procedure pain in the treatment area from the cryoablation treatment
(VAS 0-10), described as the median pain scores directly and 1, 7 and 30 days
after treatment.
2. Post-procedure dysphagia (0-4 dysphagia score), described as the median
dysphagia scores directly, 1, 7 and 30 days after treatment.
3. Incidence of all serious and non-serious adverse events up to 30 days
post-treatment
4. Efficacy, defined as the percentage of patients with histopathological
confirmed complete eradication of BE and absence of subsquamous intestinal
metaplasia.
Background summary
Barrett's Esophagus (BE) is a premalignant condition, which can lead to
esophageal adenocarcinoma. This particular cancer is one of the most rapidly
increasing and deadliest cancers in the western world. Patients with BE are up
to 40 times more at risk of adenocarcinoma than individuals without BE. Once
diagnosed with BE, a patient enters a life-long surveillance program in which
upper endoscopies with biopsies are performed to survey the progression of the
Barrett's tissue to cancer. For more than 20 years, many technologies have been
evaluated for ablation of BE. Elimination of BE and restoration of squamous
esophageal lining has been demonstrated through ablation; however, no ablation
technology currently provides the necessary attributes for wide-spread
adoption. The CryoBalloon 180 Ablation System (System) is designed to address
many of the limitations of current ablation technologies. The simplicity of the
System allows for many potential benefits to the patient, the physician, and
hospital. Potential benefits are a shorter and safer procedure, easier
deployment minimizing the need for anesthesiology, smaller inventory
requirements and no capital equipment improving capital resource utilization.
Additionally, patients may experience less pain after cryoablation compared
with other ablation techniques. First, the System has undergone acute and
chronic animal testing. The testing was conducted to study safety,
deliverability and performance characteristics of the System. The studies were
conducted for the evaluation of the device in a normal pig esophagus at
dimensions very similar to a human esophagus. General follow-up time frames
were either 4 days or 28 days. Hereafter, three human trials have been
performed with the Focal cryoablation system, which evaluated the safety of the
Focal system with several doses, the device perfomance status, and the
efficacy. The studies showed safe treatment and high efficacy for cryoablation,
with 100% eradication of Barrett*s epithelium in the patients treated with the
maximal dose (10 sec). Currently, several trials are enrolling patients to
further evaluate efficacy of the System. Anyhow, this Focal system is only able
to treat relatively little areas of Barrett*s tissue. When ablating larger
areas with this focal device an important risk is that certain areas won*t be
treated or will be overtreated and, additionally, it can be a very
time-consuming procedure. Therefore the Cryoballoon 180 Ablation Sytem was
recently introduced by C2 Therapeutics. This device ablates a larger area (50%
of the circumference over a length of 3cm) in one ablation, thereby enabling
the ablation of larger BE tissue. This system was investigated in animal and
human trials, and judged to be safe. Now, we want to evaluate the efficacy of
the device in different doses, in order to find the optimal dose with maximal
efficacy and minimal burden for the patient.
Study objective
The objective of this study is to determine the safe and efficacious dose
required to eradicate LGD or HGD in BE, or residual BE after endoscopic removal
of early cancer (*therapeutic dose*), using the C2 CryoBalloon 180 Ablation
System. *Dose* is defined as the rate at which the diffuser traverses the
length of the Balloon (in millimeters per second) while emitting cryogen.
Study design
Multi-center, prospective, single arm, phase 1 safety study.
Intervention
Endoscopic balloon based cryoablation. The C2 Cryoballoon 180 Ablation system
has three main components: a delivery catheter with a spray-hole covered by a
balloon probe, a controller and a cartridge containing the cryogenic fluid. The
catheter can be inserted into the working channel of a therapeutic endoscope.
Once deployed, the balloon is simultaneously inflated and cooled with cryogenic
fluid from the cartridge. The BE cells of the esophagus will be ablated if they
come into contact with the cooled balloon. In the Cryoballoon 180 ablation
system, the spray hole of the catheter will automatically be pulled back during
ablation. In this way, an area of 3 cm length covering about 50% of the
circumference will be treated. The dosing will be expressed in the speed (in
mm/sec) whereby the catheter will be pulled back during the ablation (lower
speeds means a higher dose). Patients will undergo two Swipes, to treat the
esophageal circumferentially.
Study burden and risks
Patients will undergo 2 endoscopies in this study, which would have been
performed for regular medical care as well. The difference compared to regular
treatment is that during the first endoscopy patients will be treated with the
Cryoballoon 180 Ablation system instead of regular radiofrequency ablation
treatment. During follow-up endoscopy a thorough inspection of the esophagus,
and biopsies as well, will be performed. If necessary, additional treatment
will be performed with RFA. Patients need to adhere to a liquid diet after the
cryoablation (not different from standard care with RFA). Furthermore patients
will be contacted by telephone 1, 7 and 30 days after the cryoablation to ask
for dysphagia and pain. Finally, patients may experience temporary limited
pain, which can be treated with analgesics (paracetamol for example).
Convention Suite 1 303
Redwood City CA 94063
US
Convention Suite 1 303
Redwood City CA 94063
US
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Patients must meet ALL of the following criteria to be eligible for
participation in the study:
1. Flat- type BE esophagus, with an indication for ablation therapy, defined as:
a. Diagnosis of LGD or HGD in BE (confirmed by baseline histopathological
analysis), OR
b. Residual BE with any grade of dysplasia after endoscopic resection (EMR or
ESD) to treat non-flat BE, *6 weeks prior to enrolling the patient to this
study. The ER pathology should indicate endoscopic treatment (i.e. only mucosal
invasion or limited submucosal invasion (SM1), no lymphovascular infiltration,
free vertical resection margins and not poorly differentiated)
2. Prague Classification Score C*3 and *M1
3. Patients should be ablation-naïve, meaning they have not undergone any
previous ablation therapy of the esophagus
4. Older than 18 years of age at time of consent
5. Operable per institution*s standards
6. Provides written informed consent on the IRB-approved informed consent form
7. Willing and able to comply with follow-up requirements
Exclusion criteria
1. Esophageal stenosis preventing advancement of a therapeutic endoscope.
2. Any endoscopically visualized lesion such as ulcers, masses or nodules.
Neoplastic nodules must first be treated with ER >6 weeks prior to planned
treatment under this protocol.
3. Prior ER of more than 2cm in length or >50% of the esophageal lumen
circumference
4. History of locally advanced (>SM1) esophageal cancer
5. History of esophageal varices
6. Prior distal esophagectomy
7. Active esophagitis LA grade B or higher
8. Severe medical comorbidities precluding endoscopy
9. Uncontrolled coagulopathy
10. Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during period of study
11. Patient refuses or is unable to provide written informed consent
12. Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days
preceding or during the present study, interfering with participation in the
current study
13. General poor health, multiple co-morbidities placing the patient at risk or
otherwise unsuitable for trial participation
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL62738.100.17 |