To obtain insight into the occurrence and nature of potential problems underlying difficult-to-treat RA and into its clinical burden, that will eventually be used to improve the management approach for difficult-to-treat RA.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Synovial and bursal disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
- Clinical RA activity
- Objectively assessed inflammation
- Potential problems underlying difficult-to-treat RA:
* Causes of persistent inflammation
* Non-inflammatory causes of complaints
* Factors which hamper proper grading
Sub study: Qualitative research about non-adherence to DMARDs
- Reasons for being (non-)adherent: Gathered through face-to-face interviews
and thereafter sorted using a card sorting task
- Facilitators and barriers of treatment adherence: Gathered through
face-to-face interviews and thereafter sorted using a card sorting task
- Differences between patients and rheumatologists regarding the level of
applicability of reasons, facilitators and barriers to themselves and the
general population of RA patients, respectively
Secondary outcome
Clinical burden:
- Patient burden:
* Quality of Life using EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D)
* Functional ability using Health assessment questionnaire (HAQ)
- Socioeconomic burden: Health care utilization and work participation costs
Serum biomarkers levels:
- Serum biomarker levels, including but not limited to IL-6
Background summary
Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is defined by signs of
active/progressive RA, which is perceived as problematic by rheumatologist
and/or patient, despite treatment according to European League Against
Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations and failure of *2 biologic (b-) or targeted
synthetic (ts) disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)(with different
mechanism of action. ~5-20% of RA patients can be characterized as
difficult-to-treat. The treatment of difficult-to-treat RA patients may be
challenged by several problems underlying the disease state, e.g. immunologic
mechanisms, adverse drug reactions, treatment non-adherence, and comorbidities.
However, the importance of these individual problems is unknown, which shows
the unmet need for this patient population.
Study objective
To obtain insight into the occurrence and nature of potential problems
underlying difficult-to-treat RA and into its clinical burden, that will
eventually be used to improve the management approach for difficult-to-treat
RA.
Study design
Exploratory, single centre, cross-sectional, observational.
Study burden and risks
Patients will have one study visit, at which an interview, joint examination
and blood sampling will be performed. In addition, patients are requested to
fill in 11 questionnaires. These can be filled in at home. The total amount of
blood drawn in the study is 5 ml. Patients may develop a hematoma at the site
of venepuncture.
Some parameters (viz., medical history, demographic data, height/weight,
smoking status, alcohol use, disease duration, usage of anti-rheumatic drugs
and painkillers and clinical disease parameters) are recorded or performed in
regular care depending on the clinical situation. In that case the data will be
retrieved from the electronic patient record. However, as regular care does not
follow a strict protocol, these data may not be available for each patient. In
that case, these assessments will be collected specifically for the purpose of
this study.
In patients without evident arthritis but with some suspicion of synovitis,
ultrasound (US) will be performed in regular care in (a) suspect joint(s) to
exclude or demonstrate synovitis. In patients with (a) swollen joint(s) but
with some suspicion of having only secondary osteoarthritis, in these joints
(in addition to ultrasound) an X-ray will be performed in regular care to
exclude or demonstrate secondary osteoarthritis. For both US and X-ray, an
ipsi- or contralateral joint will be chosen as a control joint, these will be
study procedures.
The total study visit (including filling in the questionnaires) will take
approximately 2 hours.
Sub study: Qualitative research about non-adherence to DMARDs
Participants will be invited for a second study visit for a sub study to
explore reasons of DMARD non-adherence. A minimum of 10 patients will be
interviewed face-to-face to find out the reasons of non-adherence for DMARDs
and to examine facilitators and barriers for optimal adherence. These
face-to-face interviews will be carried out until data saturation is reached
during two successive interviews (expected number of interviews in between 10
and 15). The reasons, facilitators and barriers respectively, that have been
discussed during the face-to-face interviews will serve as a base for
conducting the card soring task. They will be reduced to a maximum of 60 for
each category by the project group.
Another 40 patients will be asked to perform a card sorting task to sort the
reasons, facilitators, and barriers, respectively, based on similarity and,
thereafter, to sort these into five categories of applicability to themselves.
20 rheumatologists (in training) will sort these into five categories in terms
of applicability to the general population of patients with RA.
Heidelberglaan 100
Utrecht 3584CX
NL
Heidelberglaan 100
Utrecht 3584CX
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
* Age * 18 years
* Patient can speak and read Dutch
* Fulfilling 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR classification
criteria for RA
* Treatment according to the current standard of care/EULAR recommendations for
at least one year, Additional criteria for difficult-to-treat RA group:
* Failure of *2 b/tsDMARDs (with different mechanism of action) after failing
csDMARD therapy (unless contraindicated)
* Signs of active/progressive disease, defined as *1 of:
o At least moderate disease activity (according to validated composite measures
including joint counts e.g. DAS28-ESR > 3.2 or CDAI >10)
o Signs (including inflammatory markers and imaging) and/or symptoms suggestive
of active disease (joint related or other)
o Rapid radiographic progression (with or without signs of active disease)
o Inability to taper glucocorticoid treatment (below 7.5 mg/day prednisone or
equivalent)
o Well-controlled disease according to above standards, but still having RA
symptoms that are causing a reduction in Quality of Life
* The management of signs and/or symptoms is perceived as problematic by the
rheumatologist and/or the patient. , Additional criteria for control group:
* not fulfilling the definition of difficult-to-treat RA.
Exclusion criteria
NA
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL66141.041.18 |