The primary objective is to investigate whether the use of patient-specific cutting guides for an open wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) provide a more accurate correction relative to the preoperative planning compared to the conventional osteotomy…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Musculoskeletal and connective tissue deformities (incl intervertebral disc disorders)
- Bone and joint therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint is the number of outliers defined as > 3 degrees
difference between planned and achieved correction angle in frontal plane from
3D CT model.
Secondary outcome
The secondary endpoints will be the difference between planned correction angle
(frontal and sagittal) calculated from X-rays and from 3D CT modeling. And the
sum of costs of 1 CT-scan, 3D planning and printing, additional surgical costs
(sterilization unit) and operative times as recorded in the electronic patient
record for using patient-specific cutting guides.
Background summary
The use of patient specific cutting guides with high tibial osteotomy is
thought to achieve a higher accuracy of the planned correction compared to the
conventional osteotomy planning and surgical technique. The achieved accuracy
of the conventional osteotomy depends greatly on the experience of the surgeon
to plan the correction pre-operatively and carry out this correction during the
operation. Using a CT-scan to plan the tibial correction automatically and
subsequently using 3D-printed cutting guides during the operation removes this
dependence on the skill-level of the surgeon. This study aims to investigate
the effect of this new technique on the accuracy of correction during a high
tibial osteotomy.
Study objective
The primary objective is to investigate whether the use of patient-specific
cutting guides for an open wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) provide a more
accurate correction relative to the preoperative planning compared to the
conventional osteotomy method.
The secondary objective evaluates the difference between the CT-based model
planning compared to the conventional planning method performed by surgeons on
full-leg X-rays. Furthermore, the costs of the radiology department (CT-scan),
3D planning and printing, surgical costs (sterilization unit) and operative
time in using patient-specific cutting guides versus conventional osteotomy
surgery will be compared between the two methods.
Study design
This is a prospective single-blinded randomized controlled study, where the
patients will be blinded for the use of the 3D planned and printed saw guide.
Intervention
In the intervention group a patient-specific cutting guide will be used to
assist positioning and angle of the saw cut, and provide guidance on the degree
of angular correction from the pre-operative plan. In the control group the
conventional surgical osteotomy technique, without a patient-specific cutting
guide will be used.
For all study patients both a full-leg radiograph as well as a CT-scan will be
made. The former will be used to perform the standard practice osteotomy
planning, while the latter will be used to automatically calculate the planned
correction angle. Post-operatively, all patients will receive another CT-scan
to determine the achieved correction.
Study burden and risks
Patients will undergo a pre- and postoperative CT-scan (integrated in regular
care, which means combined with a regular visit to clinic) of the affected leg
additionally to standard care. Other pre-, per- and postoperative care are
identical between the two groups and identical to regular care.
The radiation load from the CT is calculated by our radiology expert and
estimated at 0.82 mSv per scan (1,64 mSv total). This extra radiation load
leads therefore to a slight increased risk. According to the publication ICRP
62 *Radiological Protection in Biomedical Research*, this is justified because
this study will lead to acquisition of knowledge, directly aimed at cure of
disease.
Hengstdal 3
Ubbergen 6574 NA
NL
Hengstdal 3
Ubbergen 6574 NA
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Medial overload as a result of a varus tibial deformity (MPTA <88 degrees) or
medial osteoarthrosis and an MPTA <90 degrees
- Age between 18 to 65 (male) or 60 (female) years
- Consenting to an osteotomy around the knee
Exclusion criteria
- AP (anterior-posterior) instability as a result of ACL / PCL
(anterior/posterior cruciate ligaments) deficiency with an indication for
reconstruction
- Significant MCL (medial collateral ligament) instability (grade 3)
- Obesity (BMI > 35)
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL72556.091.20 |