The objective of this study is to assess the performance of the Masimo O3 regional oximeter on somatic tissue oxygenation, under controlled hypoxia. Somatic rSO2 values will be compared with combined arterial and venous blood gas measurements from…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
Anesthesiology, validation of non-invasive equipment in healthy volunteers
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The agreement between Masimo O3 derived somatic tissue rSO2 and invasively
determined somatic oxygenation values (SaO2 / SvO¬2, 30:70 ratio).
Secondary outcome
Evaluation of the association between SvO2 values derived from the tip of the
catheter in the renal vein, and from the femoral vein.
Background summary
In perioperative medicine, maintenance of tissue oxygenation is of paramount
importance to prevent organ damage and development of (post-operative)
complications. The Masimo O3 regional oximeter allows measurement of regional
tissue oxygenation (rSO2) using near-infrared spectroscopy, allowing continuous
monitoring of rSO2 of the tissue(s) of interest. The absolute and trend
accuracy of the O3 oximeter at baseline and hypoxic states revealed acceptable
results for cerebral tissue when compared to the reference gold standard (blood
samples). However, during hypoxia, the absolute accuracy of somatic rSO2 values
with invasive reference values is unknown.
Study objective
The objective of this study is to assess the performance of the Masimo O3
regional oximeter on somatic tissue oxygenation, under controlled hypoxia.
Somatic rSO2 values will be compared with combined arterial and venous blood
gas measurements from vessels draining the blood from the respective
measurement sites.
Study design
This study is a prospective, single-center healthy volunteer validation study.
Intervention
In all volunteers, a radial artery catheter will be inserted, as well as a
femoral venous catheter via a sheath, so that blood can be drawn from the tip
of the catheter (located in the renal vein) and from the femoral vein. O3
sensors will be placed bilaterally (when possible) on the flank superficial to
the kidney, and quadriceps muscles, the latter preferably at a high muscle
density location. rSO2 sensors will be placed on the forehead as well.
During interventions, volunteers will be allowed to breathe standardized oxygen
concentrations using a tight-sitting facemask or mouth-piece. Each volunteer
will undergo the *stepped hypoxia plateau sequence protocol*: Breathing
mixtures of N2 in air via a tight-fitting facemask or mouth-piece, as
determined by the preference of the volunteer. The FiO2 will be set at 0.21
(room air, baseline) and will be reduced in a stepwise fashion to achieve SpO2
values of 95%, 90%, 85%, 80%, 75% and 70%.
During baseline and during all subsequent SpO2 plateau intervals, paired whole
blood reference samples from the arterial and femoral venous access points will
be drawn.
Study burden and risks
Non-invasive measurement risks: The risk from non-invasive devices is minimal
since the measurement is non-invasive and uses optical technology.
Sensor risks: As with all optical sensors, the investigational device has the
theoretical risk of thermal burn. The design includes safeguards, and this risk
is believed to be very low. Sensors will be attached with adhesive, and may be
secured by a supplemental headband. Pressure damage may occur to the tissue if
the sensor is placed too tightly. This risk is believed to be low. Optical
exposure is minimized by procedure and low power. This risk is believed to be
low.
Stepped Hypoxia Plateau Sequence Protocol: The risks of the brief exposures to
hypoxia include feeling short of breath, headache, and dizziness. Brief loss of
consciousness may occur, but is not expected at the levels of oxygen targeted
for these tests given the magnitude of comparable studies, in which none of
these events occurred.
Femoral venous catheter placement: ultrasound-guided insertion of a femoral
venous sheath and sampling catheter is regarded safe for short-term use. It is
associated with a low incidence of serious complications, such as renal
thrombosis. To prevent renal thrombosis, a low dose of heparin will be
administered locally via the tip of the catheter. The most common complication
of the femoral venous cathether placement is local hematoma.
Catheterization is performed by experienced and qualified interventional
radiologists. Correct positioning of the proximal tip of the catheter (at the
level of the renal vein) will be ensured by x-ray or fluoroscopy, which has a
negligible long-time carcinogenic risk, and low-dose intravenous contrast
medium, which is safe in volunteers with no history of allergy.
Radial artery line placement: Arterial catheters have been found to be
relatively safe with a low incidence of serious complications. Typical
complications include temporary radial artery occlusion and hematoma. (Very)
rare complications (less than 1% of procedures) include localized catheter site
infection, hemorrhage, sepsis, permanent ischemic damage and pseudo-aneurysm
formation.
Both the use of the femoral venous catheter, as well as the stepped hypoxia
plateau sequence protocol methods is similar to the standard protocols
recommended by the FDA and ISO Standards for testing pulse oximeters with mild
hypoxia steps and blood drawn from arterial catheters (ISO 80601-2-61:2011).
Discovery 52
Irvine CA 92618
US
Discovery 52
Irvine CA 92618
US
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
* Age between 18 and 45 years
* Willing and able to provide written informed consent
* Healthy volunteer
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant women (female subjects will have a pregnancy test prior to being
admitted to the study).
* Presence of any cardiovascular or pulmonary disease
* Exposure to high altitude(s) (>2000 m) within 30 days prior to the study
* Known allergy to intravenous contrast medium or heparin
* Volunteer has skin abnormalities affecting the digits such as psoriasis,
eczema, angioma, scar tissue, burn, fungal infection, substantial skin
breakdown, nail polish or acrylic nails that would prevent monitoring of SpO2
levels during the study
* Patients deemed not suitable for the study at the discretion of the
Investigator
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT04584788 |
CCMO | NL75041.028.20 |