In this study we aim to investigate prognostic factors by adding extra questionnaires for patients and their caregivers, observation list and the use of an accelerometer. These variables can provide information about the successful as well as non-…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Fractures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The main study objective for the three combined research focusses of HIP CARE
is to determine if there are prognostic factors which may have influence on
successful geriatric rehabilitation after one year, which is operationalized in
terms of survival, residing in pre-fracture home situation, and functional
recovery
Informal caregivers:
• Quality of life
• Caregiver strain
Secondary outcome
Patients
• General activities-of daily-living (ADL): Katz-ADL
• Daily life activity Lawton iADL
• Quantification function of the hip: Harris hips score (HHS)
• Generic health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L)
• Healthcare utilisation
• Social functioning (loneliness)
Caregivers
• Social functioning (loneliness)
Determinants for patients
• Patient and informal caregiver characteristics
• Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
• 1-item fear of falling (FOF)
• Falls efficacy scale international (FESi-7)
• GARVAN bone fracture risk calculation
• Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI)
• Accelerometer: measures mobility during the course of a 7 days
• Hand grip force (HGF)
• Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)
• Fat free mass index (FFMI)
• Routine healthcare data GP five years before and two years after surgery
(using ELAN)
• Living situation
• Cognitive screening
• Nutritional status
• Complications
• Coping at baseline
Determinants for caregivers
• Proxy Fear of falling
• Coping at baseline
• Anxiety and depression
Background summary
Hip fracture is a major cause for mortality and morbidity in elderly persons
with an incidence of 17,000 in 2016. Beacuse of the incrasing age it is
expected that the number of hip fracture patients will increase. They form a
frail population. Patients with hip fracture have a mean age of 82 years,
almost 75% of their patients are women, nearly 70% has at least two chronic
illnesses , and they experience on average 3 complications 25% mortality rate
and only 40-60% chance of complete functional recovery in the first year after
fracture.
After the acute hospital phase, patients that had a previous independent living
situation are either discharged home or to an inpatient geriatric
rehabilitation(GR) in post-acute GR wards where they treated by a
multidisciplinary team consisting of an elderly care physician , physical
therapist, occupational therapist, psychologist and skilled nurse. Currently
there are no clear guidelines determining type, quality, or intensity during
rehabilitation admission. Also, the effect of quality and intensity as well as
important (age related) characteristic on functional outcome and quality of
life are unknown.
Other factors that are related to the success of geriatric rehabilitation after
a hip fracture include coping behaviour and psychosocial factors such as
depression and fear of falling and the way therapist can handle these personal
factors. The presence of an informal caregivers is probably an important
success factor in rehabilitation after hip fracture.
Study objective
In this study we aim to investigate prognostic factors by adding extra
questionnaires for patients and their caregivers, observation list and the use
of an accelerometer. These variables can provide information about the
successful as well as non-successful rehabilitation process and explore
effective treatment programmes with the purpose of developing good
care-pathways. In order to develop these care-pathways, it is important to
gather information about patient-related factors, healthcare use during and
after admission to post-acute GR wards as well as caregiver burden and quality
of life
Study design
A mixed-method approach with a large inception cohort and qualitative
data-collection from surgeons/orthopaedic surgeons , elderly care physicians,
physical therapists, patients and primary care givers
Study burden and risks
In the post- operative fase the patient and care giver will be given
information about the study.
The patient has 24-48 hours to think about the study. After this period the
researcher will supply verbal information and if agreed the informed consent
will be signed. There are questionnaire during the post- operative phase for
both patients and care givers The is time consuming for the patient and his/her
caregiver.
During the follow upt there are no additional check ups beside the regular
outpatient check-ups causing no additional burden to the patient. The burden
of participating is time investment due to the additional questionnaires
that must be filled in combination with the usual care given. The out patient
check will therefore be extende by 30 minutes.
During the 3 month control the patient will be fitted for an accelerometer for
7 days. Previous studies show that the burden is minimal.
For the patients in the follow up fase who cannot come to the outpatient
check-up the researcher will conducted the investigation at their home or in
the nursing home. This too is a burden of time investing for the patient and
his/her caregiver.
Bronovolaan 5
Den Haag 2597
NL
Bronovolaan 5
Den Haag 2597
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
patienten:
> 70 years, admitted to HMC Bronovo for acute hip fracture, Only patients
eligible for (geriatric) rehabilitation. , informal caregivers:
family member or other natural person who normally provides the daily care or
super-vision of the patient with a hip fracture,
Exclusion criteria
patients:
<70 years, residing in a nursing home before the hip fracture, unwilling to
provide informed
consent, unable to provide informed consent and insufficient mastery of the
Dutch language. Pathological hip fractures, informal caregivers:
• Insufficient mastery of the Dutch language
• Unable to provide informed consent
• Unwilling to provide informed consent.
Design
Recruitment
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL66871.098.18 |