Since previous findings underline the hypothesis that ER may play a key role as an underlying mechanism leading to (re)victimisation, we suggest that a clinical intervention aimed at enhancing ER skills may decrease (re)victimisation risk. Therefore…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
- Mood disorders and disturbances NEC
Synonym
Health condition
Victimisatie (slachtofferschap)
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint is the total number of violent crime occurrences during
the three years follow up, as measured with the Integrale Veiligheidsmonitor
(IVM).The IVM is developed by the Dutch Central Agency for Statistics, the
Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations and the Ministry of Justice.
Approximately 65,000 people in the general population are screened yearly with
the IVMS to determine national victimization rates. The IVM is a self-report
instrument, which is more reliable in measuring victimization than a police
report (Hiday, 1999). Other primary outcome measures are depression symptoms
(as measured with the IDS-SR) and emotion regulation (as measured with the
Difficulties of Emotion Regulation Scale; DERS).
Secondary outcome
The secondary outcome measures are:
1. Subjective safety (Module 3 of the IVM);
2. Depression (Inventory of Depressive Symptoms; IDS-SR and QIDS);
3. Diagnosis of depression and comorbid disorders (Mini-International
Neuropsychiatric Interview; MINI);
4. Emotion Dysregulation (Difficulties in ER Scale; DERS);
5. Mood (Visual Analogue Mood Scale; VAMS);
6. Coping (Utrechtse Coping Lijst; UCL)
7. Dysfunctional attitudes (Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale; DAS-A-17);
8. Brooding (Brooding subscale of the Rumination Response Scale; RSS-NL);
9. Locus of control (Mastery scale);
10. Positive affect (PANAS);
11. Psychiatric distress (Brief Symptom Inventory; BSI);
12. Quality of life (EuroQol; EQ-5D);
13. Self-esteem (Self-esteem rating scale; SERS-SF-20);
14. Interpersonal functioning (Inventory of Interpersonal Problems; IIP-64);
15. Direct and indirect costs (Trimbos/iMTA questionnaire for Costs associated
with Psychiatric Illness; TiC-P);
16. Working alliance (Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form; WAI-SF);
17. Client Satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire; CSQ);
18. Personality (NEO-FFI);
19. Posttraumatic Stress symptoms (Posttraumatic Symptoms
Diagnostic scale; PDS)
20. Negative Life Events (Brugha)
21. Victimisation during the Covid 19 measures in spring 2020.
22. Psychological complaints due to the Covid 19 measures in spring 2020.
Characteristics such as sex, age, level of education, ethnicity, living
conditions and area, early victimisation and (sexual) maltreatment in the youth
(Childhood Trauma Questionnaire; CTQ-SF), will be used as mediators and
moderators.
Background summary
Depressed patients are 3.8 times more likely to be a victim of a violent crime
in comparison to people in the general population. In a sample of 104 depressed
outpatients, 34% were victim of at least one violent crime in the previous 12
months (Meijwaard et al., 2015). Depressed patients seem to be particularly
vulnerable to violent crimes such as assault, threat and sexual crimes. The
high victimisation rates found in depressed patients, combined with the notable
prevalence rates of depression, underline the relevance of an intervention
aimed at reducing victimisation in depressed patients, which does not yet exist.
Apart from previous victimisation, symptom severity and depression (Cougle,
2009; Teasdale, 2009; van Weeghel, 2009; Iverson, 2011), emotion regulation
(ER) is assumed to be an underlying mechanism in victimisation (i.e., Marx et
al., 2005). Emotion dysregulation (ED) is considered to be a consequence of and
a risk factor for both victimisation and depression. The influence of ED on
victimisation seems highly relevant for patients with depression. Many studies
have shown that symptom severity of (past) depression is likely to coincide
with ED (Campbell-Sills, 2006; Garnefski & Kraaij, 2006; Ehring, 2008).
Depressed patients report increased ER problems such as experiencing,
differentiating, attenuating and modulating emotions as compared to healthy
controls (Brockmeyer, 2012). Therefore, the addition of an emotion regulation
training to regular treatment is expected to reduce victimisation risk in
previously victimized depressed patients.
Study objective
Since previous findings underline the hypothesis that ER may play a key role as
an underlying mechanism leading to (re)victimisation, we suggest that a
clinical intervention aimed at enhancing ER skills may decrease
(re)victimisation risk. Therefore, in this study we want to examine the
effectiveness of the addition of online Emotion-Regulation Training (ERT) to
Treatment As Usual (TAU) in reducing future victimisation in high risk
outpatients suffering from a depression, who have been violently victimized at
least once in the past three years. Patients will be randomly allocated to TAU
or to TAU complemented with ERT. We expect patients in the experimental
condition, who receive additional ERT training, to be more resistant to future
victimisation as compared to patients in the control condition.
Study design
A 2-arm randomized controlled trial examining the (cost-)effectiveness of ERT
added to standard treatment (TAU), as compared to standard treatment alone in
outpatients with a depression. Patients in both the control and experimental
condition receive TAU. Patients in the experimental condition also receive ERT.
Assessments will take place at baseline, 8 and 14 weeks after start of
treatment, and 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after baseline. An additional
questionnaire will be assessed in August 2020 regarding the Covid-19 measures.
The primary endpoint is the total number of violent crime occurrences during
the three years follow up, as measured with the Integrale Veiligheidsmonitor
(IVM). An economic evaluation will be conducted alongside the RCT.
Intervention
The experimental intervention will consist of an abbreviated and adapted
version of the ER skills training (ERT, a short version of the Affect
Regulation Training [ART]) as developed by Berking (2007). ERT will be provided
as an online training and will be added to Treatment As Usual. ERT is a highly
structured intervention that enhances ER skills and contains techniques from
CBT, dialectical behavioural therapy, emotion-focused therapy,
mindfulness-based interventions, self-compassion trainings and problem-solving
therapies. ERT starts with a thorough psycho-education of emotional reactions
and seven neuroaffective vicious cycles that are considered important for
long-term maintenance of negative emotions. Then, seven skills that are
designed to interrupt these cycles are taught to the participants.In our
abbreviated version, we will focus on four ER skills Non-judgmental awareness,
Acceptance and tolerance, Identification of emotions and Modification of
emotions. The selection of skills that we will focus on, is completely based on
existing literature regarding emotion dysregulation in depression and
victimization.
Study burden and risks
Burden:
Subjects will have to invest time when participating in this study. Subjects in
the experimental condition will need to invest more time than subjects in the
control condition. On the other hand, they will participate in an extra
intervention of which we assume that it improves emotion regulation skills and
reduced vulnerability for victimisation. A more specific overview of time
investment for this study can be found in section E2.
Participants in both conditions will complete questionnaires at baseline (2
assessments), 8 weeks, 14 weeks and 6 months after start of treatment and 12,
24 and 36 months after randomisation. An overview of these questionnaires can
be found in section K1.
Risks:
There are no anticipated risks involved in participating in this research.
De Boelelaan 1118
Amsterdam 1081 HZ
NL
De Boelelaan 1118
Amsterdam 1081 HZ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
(1) Primary diagnosis of a Major Depressive Disorder according to DSM-IV
criteria, or a secondary diagnosis of a Major Depressive Disorder next to a
primary anxiety disorder (other than obsessive-compulsive disorder) according
to DSM-IV criteria.
(2) Indicated for outpatient psychotherapy aimed at a depression or anxiety
disorder
(3) Having been victim of at least one violent crime (such as a threat, assault
or sexual abuse) during the past three years;
(4) Access to a computer or tablet with internet connection;
(5) Aged 18 years or older.
Exclusion criteria
(1) Psychotic symptoms, according to the DSM-IV, as measured with section
L of the M.I.N.I.;
(2) Current high risk for suicide requiring intervention;
(3) Insufficient understanding of the spoken and written Dutch language;
(4) Bipolar disorder, according to section D of the M.I.N.I.;
(5) Substance dependency that requires treatment;
(6) Obsessive-compulsive disorder, according to the DSM-IV.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL54940.029.15 |
OMON | NL-OMON26288 |