Primary objective:* To establish the effects of givinostat versus placebo administered chronically over 18 months to slow disease progression in ambulant DMD subjects.Secondary objectives:* To assess the safety and tolerability of givinostat versus…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Muscle disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary endpoints:
* Mean change in 4SC before and after 18 months of treatment of givinostat
versus placebo.
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints:
Key endpoints (all subjects):
* Mean change in time to rise from floor
* Mean change in 6MWT
* Mean change in NSAA
* Cumulative loss of function on the NSAA
* Mean change in muscle strength evaluated by knee extension, elbow flexion as
measured by HHM
Imaging (MR cohort):
* Mean change in vastus lateralis muscles fat fraction; comparing the MRS
before and after 12 months of treatment of givinostat versus placebo;
* Mean change in 4SC before and after 12 months of treatment of givinostat
versus placebo;
* Mean change in time to rise from floor before and after 12 months of
treatment of givinostat versus placebo;
* Mean change in 6MWT before and after 12 months of treatment of givinostat
versus placebo;
* Mean change in NSAA before and after 12 months of treatment of givinostat
versus placebo;
* Mean change in muscle strength evaluated by knee extension before and after
12 months of treatment of givinostat versus placebo;
* Mean change in fat fraction of vastus lateralis muscles comparing the MRS
before and after 18 months of treatment of givinostat versus placebo.
Safety endpoints:
* Number of subjects experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and
serious adverse events (SAEs) (Baseline through end of study [EOS]);
* Type, incidence, and severity of TEAEs and SAEs (Baseline through EOS);
* Changes from baseline to end of study of:
o Vital signs and clinical laboratory tests (blood chemistry and hematology);
o Respiratory function evaluated by forced vital capacity (FVC), forced
expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1), FVC/FEV1, Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF);
o Cardiac function evaluated by ECG and ECHO;
o Cognitive function evaluated by the Raven coloured progressive matrices;
o Weight, height, and body mass index (BMI).
Pharmacokinetic Endpoints:
* Description of the PK of givinostat and its major metabolites: ITF2374 and
ITF2375 in the subject population;
* Identification of the relevant demographic and pathophysiological covariates
influencing the PK of givinostat.
Exploratory endpoints:
* Mean changes in:
o time to walk/run 10 meters;
o PODCI scores;
o %-predicted 6MWT;
o Only in the MR cohort: MRI parameters (e.g., fat fraction of thigh muscles,
CSA of vastus lateralis and other thigh muscles).
* Time to 10% persistent worsening in 6MWT (Baseline through end of study);
* Proportion of subjects with *10% worsening in 6MWT at end of study;
* Time to loss of standing (Baseline through end of study);
* Proportion of subjects who loose ambulation during the study;
* Evaluation of any correlation between the effect of Givinostat on disease
progression and the type of DMD mutation, LTBP4 and Osteopontin genotype;
* Evaluation of any possible DMD serum biomarker;
* PK-PD analyses: relationships between metrics of exposure and efficacy/safety
endpoints of givinostat.
Background summary
There are still no curative treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy and the
current management of the disease is based on prevention and management of
complications. Therefore, there is an unmet therapeutic need exists for the
treatment of this disabling and fatal condition. The risk/benefit ratio of
this study is postulated to be favorable for the clinical safety for the
efficacy based in the preclinical and the human Phase 2 study. This
randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study is aimed to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of givinostat in ambulant patients with
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). The main objective is to establish the
effects of givinostat versus placebo administered chronically over 18 months to
slow disease progression in ambulant DMD subjects. Ambulant male paediatric
subjects aged *6 years at baseline affected by DMD will be included.
Study objective
Primary objective:
* To establish the effects of givinostat versus placebo administered
chronically over 18 months to slow disease progression in ambulant DMD subjects.
Secondary objectives:
* To assess the safety and tolerability of givinostat versus placebo
administered chronically in DMD subjects.
* To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of givinostat administered
chronically in the target population;
* To evaluate the impact on quality of life and activities of daily living of
givinostat versus placebo administered chronically.
Secondary exploratory objectives:
* To evaluate the correlation between PK profile of givinostat and
pharmacodynamics (PD) data;
* To explore whether the effects of givinostat versus placebo administered
chronically may be related to the type of DMD mutation or to the biomarkers.
Study design
This is a Phase 3, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre
study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of givinostat in ambulant subjects
with DMD. This study will include ambulant male paediatric subjects aged *6
years at baseline affected by DMD. Approximately 213 subjects will be
randomised in order to have 192 fully evaluable subjects (10% of drop out).
Subjects who assent to participate in this study (if capable of doing so) and
whose parent/legal guardian sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) to participate
will undergo pre-study screening assessments up to 4 weeks before the first
scheduled dose of study drug.
At the randomisation visit, in addition to the continued standard of care
corticosteroids regimen, DMD subjects will be randomised (2:1 ratio) to receive
givinostat oral suspension 10 mg/mL or placebo oral suspension bid (in a fed
state).
At randomisation, subjects will be stratified for their concomitant use of
steroids in 2 strata:
1. Daily regimen
2. Intermittent regimen
The study duration is planned for 19 months and comprises 2 phases:
1. Screening period: starting 4 weeks (± 2 weeks) before randomisation
2. Treatment period: 18 months of treatment
There will be a total of 15 visits, including the Screening and the
Randomisation Visits and excluding the Follow up Visit. Subjects may be
evaluated more often if necessary for safety reasons. Subjects who discontinue
the study drug early will be asked to come in for an EOS
Visit within 2 weeks after the last dose of study drug. Subjects who have
ongoing AEs at discontinuation will be followed until resolution or
stabilization. In order to guarantee the continuation of treatment with
givinostat, the Sponsor has planned a long-term safety study which will start
when the first subject enrolled in this study has attended his last visit. As a
consequence, at the end of the treatment, parent/ legal guardian
will be asked to consent and subject will be asked to assent/consent to his
participation to the long-term safety study. In case the subject will not
assent/consent and/or the parent/ legal guardian will not consent it, a final
follow up visit will be performed 4 weeks after last dose
administration.
Intervention
A total of 213 male ambulant subjects will be randomised to provide 192 fully
evaluable subjects (10% of drop-out subjects is foreseen).
Subjects will be stratified for their concomitant use of steroids in 4 strata:
1. Deflazacort Daily regimen
2. Deflazacort Intermittent regimen
3. Other steroids Daily regimen
4. Other steroids Intermittent regimen
Randomisation ratio:
2:1 (about 142 subjects in givinostat arm and 71 in placebo arm to give 128 and
64 evaluable subjects respectively)
Study burden and risks
Concerning the clinical experience in DMD, the aforementioned histological
results observed in the mdx mouse model were replicated in a Phase 2 study of
givinostat (Study DSC/11/2357/43, EudraCT n. 2012-002566-12) in 20 ambulant DMD
subjects (from 7 to 10 years of age at study start, on stable steroid
treatment) where, after one year of treatment, the muscle biopsy analysis
showed a significant increase in muscle fibers area fraction (MFAF) and a
significant reduction of muscle necrosis, fatty replacement and fibrosis.
Analysis of the effect on CSA of the muscle fibers showed that givinostat
significantly increases CSA of all type of fibers (small, medium, large) in a
similar manner and that such effect on CSA predicts the increase in MFAF and
the reduction of fibrosis. In addition, an increase in the number of
regenerating fibers and satellite cells was observed. Moreover, descriptive
analysis conducted on the secondary efficacy endpoints on muscle function
(i.e., six-minute walking test [6MWT], North Star Ambulatory Assessment [NSAA],
time function tests and pulmonary function tests) showed an overall stability
after 1 year of treatment in this population.
The most common AEs observed were thrombocytopenia, as well as gastrointestinal
toxicities. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate and reversible upon
discontinuation of study drug. Moreover, dose-dependent asymptomatic and
reversible platelets count reductions were observed both in healthy volunteers
and subjects treated with givinostat. These decreases typically occurred
within the first week after treatment initiation. The majority of
thrombocytopenic events were mild in severity with fewer than 10% of subjects
developing platelets count below 75 x 109/L. All occurrences resolved
completely within 2 to 3 weeks of discontinuation of treatment, suggesting a
rapidly reversible effect. No hemorrhagic episodes were observed. In addition,
during the study particular attention will be paid in monitoring possible
effects on QTc (see Table 4 for details), since some episodes (20 episodes in
14 subjects) of Corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation have been recorded
during the clinical studies performed so far. It is worth noting that 90% of
the recorded events were reported in oncological studies in subjects treated at
highest doses (e.g., *100 mg/daily) and no events were recorded during the
previous study in DMD subjects.
The risk/benefit ratio of the proposed study is postulated to be favorable for
both the results of the clinical safety and pre-clinical toxicology studies and
for the efficacy results in the previous Phase 2 DMD study.
(for more information see section 4.2.2 and 4.2.3 of the protocol; Clinical
Experience with Givinostat Including Risks and Benefits, pages 33-38)
via dei lavoratori 54 NA
Cinisello Balsamo 20092
IT
via dei lavoratori 54 NA
Cinisello Balsamo 20092
IT
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Subjects must meet all the following inclusion criteria:
1. Are ambulant males aged *6 years at randomisation with DMD characteristic
clinical symptoms or signs (e.g., proximal muscle weakness, Gowers* maneuver,
elevated serum creatinine kinase level) already present at screening;
2. Have DMD diagnosis confirmed by genetic testing;
3. Are able to give informed assent and/or consent in writing signed by the
subject and/or parent/legal guardian (according to local regulations);
4. Are able to complete 2 Four Stairs Climb test (4SC) screening assessments;
the results of these tests must be within ±1 second of each other;
5. Have the mean of 2 screening 4SC assessments *8 seconds;
6. Have time to rise from floor between *3 and <10 seconds at screening;
7. Have manual muscle testing (MMT) of quadriceps at screening * Grade - 3;
8. Have used systemic corticosteroids for a minimum of 6 months immediately
prior to the start of study treatment, with no significant change in
corticosteroids type or dosage or dosing regimen (excluding changes related to
body weight change) for a minimum of 6 months immediately prior to start of
study treatment and a reasonable expectation that dosage and dosing regimen
will not change significantly for the duration of the study.
9. Subjects must be willing to use adequate contraception.
Contraceptive methods must be used from Randomization Visit 3 through 3 months
after the last dose of study drug, and include the following:
* True abstinence (absence of any sexual intercourse), when in line with the
preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. Periodic abstinence (e.g.
calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, postovulation methods) and withdrawal are
not acceptable methods of contraception.
* Condom with spermicide and the female partner must use an acceptable method
of contraception, such as an oral, transdermal, injectable or implanted
steroid-based contraceptive, or a diaphragm or a barrier method of
contraception in conjunction with spermicidal jelly such as for example
cervical cap with spermicide jelly.
Exclusion criteria
Subjects presenting with any of the following criteria will not be included in
the study:
1. Have exposure to another investigational drug within 3 months prior to the
start of study treatment (only exception allowed is use of Deflazacort in US as
part of the Expanded Access Program and in Canada as part of the Special Access
Program;
2. Have exposure to idebenone within 3 months prior to the start of study
treatment;
3. Have exposure to any dystrophin restoration product (e.g., Ataluren,
Exon-skipping) within 6 months prior to the start of study treatment;
4. Use of any pharmacologic treatment, other than corticosteroids, that might
have had an effect on muscle strength or function within 3 months prior to the
start of study treatment (e.g., growth hormone); Vitamin D, calcium, and any
other supplements will be allowed as long as their intake has been stable for 3
months prior to the start of study treatment. Testosterone will also be allowed
if it is used as a replacement therapy for the treatment of delayed puberty,
and testosterone dose and regimen have been stable for at least 6 months and
circulating testosterone levels are within the normal ranges for the subject's
age;
5. Have surgery that might have an effect on muscle strength or function within
3 months before study entry or planned surgery at any time during the study;
6. Loss of *30 degrees of plantar flexion from the normal range of movement at
the ankle joint due to contracture (i.e. fixed loss of more than 10 degrees of
plantar flexion from plantigrade, assuming normal range of dorsiflexion of 20
degrees);
7. Change in contracture treatment such as serial casting, contracture control
devices, night splints, stretching exercises (passive, active, self) within 3
months prior to enrollment, or expected need for such intervention during the
study;
8. Have presence of other clinically significant disease, which, in the
Investigator*s opinion, could adversely affect the safety of the subject,
making it unlikely that the course of treatment or follow-up would be
completed, or could impair the assessment of study results;
9. Have a diagnosis of other uncontrolled neurological diseases or presence of
relevant uncontrolled somatic disorders that are not related to DMD;
10. Have platelets count, White Blood Cell and Hemoglobin at screening Limit of Normal (LLN) (for abnormal screening laboratory test results (the platelets count, White Blood Cell and Hemoglobin will be repeated once; if
the repeat test result is still 11. Have symptomatic cardiomyopathy or heart failure (New York Heart
Association Class III or IV) or left ventricular ejection fraction <50% at
screening;
12. Have a current or history of liver disease or impairment, including but not
limited to an elevated total bilirubin (i.e. > 1.5 x ULN), unless secondary to
Gilbert disease or pattern consistent with Gilbert's;
13. Have inadequate renal function, as defined by serum Cystatin C >2 x the
upper limit of normal (ULN). If the value is >2 x ULN, the serum Cystatin C
will be repeated once; if the repeated test result is still >2 x ULN, the
subject should be excluded);
14. Have Triglycerides > 300 mg/dL (3.42 mmol/L) in fasting condition at
screening visit;
15. Have a positive test for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody,
or human immunodeficiency virus at screening;
16. Have a baseline corrected QT interval, Fridericia*s correction (QTcF) >450
msec, (as the mean of 3 consecutive readings 5 minutes apart) or history of
additional risk factors for torsades de pointes (e.g., heart failure,
hypokalemia, or family history of long QT syndrome);
17. Have a psychiatric illness/social situations rendering the potential
subject unable to understand and comply with the muscle function tests and/or
with the study protocol procedures;
18. Have any hypersensitivity to the components of study medication;
19. Have a sorbitol intolerance or sorbitol malabsorption, or have the
hereditary form of fructose intolerance.
20. Have contraindications to MRI or MRS (e.g., claustrophobia, metal implants,
or seizure disorder)., At the discretion of the Investigator, subjects not
meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria may be re-screened twice with an interval
of at least 3 months between assessments.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2016-000401-36-NL |
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT03373968 |
CCMO | NL58595.058.16 |