To compare the effect of two target ranges (91%-95% and 92%-96%) while on automated oxygen control on the time spent under the target range in preterm infants.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Neonatal respiratory disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
To compare the effect of two target ranges (91%-95% and 92%-96%) while on
automated oxygen control while using the OxyGenie controller on the frequency
of hypoxic episodes (SpO2 <80% for 1 second or longer).
Secondary outcome
- To compare the effect of two target ranges (91%-95% and 92%-96%) while on
automated oxygen control by using the OxyGenie controller on parameters of
oxygenation:
a) Distribution of oxygen saturation (the SpO2 histogram).
b) Proportion of time in hypoxaemia and hyperoxaemia (varying degrees).
c) Frequency and duration of hypoxaemic and hyperoxaemic episodes, and of
bradycardia. (defined as a heartrate < 100 for more than 10 seconds)
d) Frequency of FiO2 adjustments during automated control, both made by the
controller, and by bedside staff to over-ride the automated system.
e) Overall oxygen exposure (average measured FiO2) .
- To compare the effect of two SpO2 target ranges (91%-95% and 92%-96%) during
automated oxygen control on alarm pressure for the caregiver:
Frequency of SpO2 alarms on smartphone
Total duration of SpO2 alarms on smartphone
Background summary
Hypoxia and hyperoxia during oxygen therapy for preterm infants can result in
significant morbidity and mortality. To reduce these risks, continuous
measurement of oxygen saturation (SpO2) guides the titration of supplemental
oxygen to target SpO2 values of 91-95%. We have previously studied the effect
of two automated oxygen controllers (the OxyGenie and the CLiO2) on time spent
within a set target range in the COCkPIT trial. We showed a distinct difference
in the distribution of oxygen saturation between controllers: the OxyGenie
controller had a narrower distribution, with a significant reduction in time
above target range when compared to the CLiO2 controller. However, this was
accompanied by a disproportionally smaller increase in time spent under target
range (15% during Oxygenie control, 9% during CLiO2 control). These differences
may partly be explained by the tendency for the OxyGenie controller to target
the midpoint of the target range (93% in case of a target range of 91%-95%). In
contrast the CLiO2 controller, according to its patent, targets a SpO2 value of
94% while in target range. Considering the non-linearity of the oxygen tension
and oxygen saturation relation (oxygen dissociation curve), it is possible that
aiming for a higher target range while using automated oxygen titration will
result in less time spent under the target range and fewer target range
deviations.
Study objective
To compare the effect of two target ranges (91%-95% and 92%-96%) while on
automated oxygen control on the time spent under the target range in preterm
infants.
Study design
Randomised cross-over study.
Intervention
In both groups supplemental oxygen will be titrated by the OxyGenie automated
oxygen controller for 25 hours, either titrated to a target range of 91%-95% or
92%-96%. Automated oxygen control aimed at a range of 91%-95% is standard of
care in our unit.
Study burden and risks
There is no additional burden for the patient as no extra interventions are
required.
A more stable SpO2 and fewer desaturations may reduce the risk of associated
morbidity. Considering the very short study period (25 hours on the
interventional target range), the behaviour of the oxygen controller while
within target range, and the unlikeliness of hyperoxaemia while on the upper
limit of the target range there are no additional risks of this study.
Preterm infants often need respiratory support and supplemental oxygen for a
prolonged period of time. Oxygen is often titrated in order to maintain SpO2
within the small therapeutic range. Both hypoxaemia and hyperoxaemia are
associated with morbidity and mortality in this group, and any intervention
aiming to reduce the risk therefore needs to be studied in this specific
population at risk.
Albinusdreef 2
Leiden 2333ZA
NL
Albinusdreef 2
Leiden 2333ZA
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Born between 24-32 weeks of gestation receiving respiratory support and
supplemental oxygen (at least 25%), with written informed parental consent.
Exclusion criteria
Major congenital anomalies or arterial hypotension requiring vasopressor
therapy within 48 hours prior to enrolment.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL77097.058.21 |