Primary objective: To acquire motor maps of the BR and the MD muscles by using the pseudorandom walk method and assess their change after long-term motor learning. Secondary objectives: Compute muscle synergies from the motor maps and assess their…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
- Central nervous system vascular disorders
Synonym
Health condition
Brain plasticity in healthy participants
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Motor learning: Accuracy on the motor task.
Motor maps: The area, volume, and centre of gravity of the muscle cortical
representations for the MD and the BR muscles. Potential change will serve as a
measure of cortical plasticity after motor learning.
MEP-amplitude ratio: Measure for brain excitability. The height of the MEP
amplitudes will be measured at a constant stimulation intensity.
Secondary outcome
Muscle synergies: The extent to which the motor maps overlap.
Intermanual transfer: Potential change in the motor maps of the hemisphere that
is not undergoing the intervention.
Background summary
Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability. Functional recovery involves
both spontaneous recovery and motor learning. The latter relies on the ability
of the primary motor cortex (M1) to functionally reorganize and adapt the
existing muscle synergies. Muscle areas on the M1 can be measured by applying
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) over the motor cortex while
simultaneously measuring the amplitudes of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs)
in the Electromyography (EMG) signal of the target muscle. A recently developed
mapping technique, the pseudorandom walk method, significantly reduces time
needed to perform TMS mapping without sacrificing the reliability of the
measurements. Due to this faster technique, it is now possible to map several
muscles at once, which was not viable before with the traditional mapping
method. To investigate the movement control of the upper-limb we focus on the
proximal Medial Deltoid (MD) and the distal Brachioradialis (BR) muscles. These
muscles have not been mapped yet using the pseudorandom walk method.
Furthermore, motor learning studies mostly remain focused on the effects of
short-term training. Thus, the goal of this experiment is to use the
pseudorandom walk method to map the two muscles of interest and measure their
change after a long-term motor learning task. We will compare the obtained
motor maps, the mean MEPs measured at the hotspot, the overlap in the cortical
representations, and the potential for interhemispheric transfer before and
after the period of the motor learning.
Study objective
Primary objective: To acquire motor maps of the BR and the MD muscles by using
the pseudorandom walk method and assess their change after long-term motor
learning.
Secondary objectives: Compute muscle synergies from the motor maps and assess
their change. Investigate potential changes on the contralateral motor maps of
the side of the body that will not undergo any motor learning.
Study design
Crossover intervention study
Intervention
Motor learning of a complex upper-limb motor task - throwing of darts
Study burden and risks
Healthy participants will visit the Erasmus MC on 2 days for a total of 2 hours
per visit. There is a 6-week period in between the two sessions. In this time,
half of the participants will go through a motor learning of a complex motor
task at home. All the materials will be provided. These participants will be
asked to keep a diary of their performance. In this study, the safety measures
are applied as described in recent brain stimulation reviews. There are no
serious risks associated with this study. The minimal risks associated with the
discharge of the TMS coil at higher intensity levels are the loud sounds and a
temporary discomfort in the muscles on the head.
Dr. Molewaterplein 40
Rotterdam 3015GD
NL
Dr. Molewaterplein 40
Rotterdam 3015GD
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Healthy
Aged 18-55 years
Right-handed
Exclusion criteria
History of neurological or psychiatric disorders
Implants or metal parts in the head
Use of psychoactive drugs in the last month
Pregnancy
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL75865.078.20 |