We aim to introduce 166Ho radioembolization combined with systemic chemotherapy and investigate its safety and feasibility.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Hepatobiliary neoplasms malignant and unspecified
- Metastases
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
We expect that this treatment strategy of TARE and systemic chemotherapy is
feasible if 85% of the included patients safely received the combination
therapy. Safety is defined as the percentage of the 90 day
post-radioembolization toxicity (CTCAE/SIR grade 3 or higher) which leads to
discontinuation of the current systemic chemotherapy.
Secondary outcome
We will collect data that might be associated with lesion- and patient-based
response, overall toxicity and quality of life. These data can be used to
improved future study protocols.
Background summary
Liver metastases occur in approximately 50% of the metastatic breast cancer
patients and are an independent negative prognostic factor for OS. Most LMBC
patients have extended systemic disease and will therefore receive systemic
therapy. Challenges of chemotherapy remain the toxicity levels and resistance
which necessitate a switch or a break of chemotherapeutical. When patients
become resistant to systemic therapy and have liver metastasis, they may
benefit from an intra-arterial therapy, such as TARE. The available literature
for TARE in LMBC patients is however more limited with mainly retrospective or
small prospective series. Nevertheless, these reports show promising results
with a pooled response rate of 49% (range 9-100%) and a pooled median survival
of 9.2 months (range 6.1-35.4 months). The longest OS after TARE to date was
reached in the study that combined 90Y TARE with systemic therapy in 83% of the
patients. Yet, two out of the four serious adverse events occurred in the
patients that concurrently received pembrolizumab and carboplatin. Therefore,
safety of the combination of TARE and systemic therapy should be evaluated
first before moving into an efficacy trial. The current available evidence for
TARE in LMBC patients is mainly built with 90Y microspheres. 166Ho
microspheres have recently become available in the European market as the third
type of microspheres for radioembolization. 166Ho has specific imaging and
treatment benefits over 90Y TARE which can potentially enhance the results of
this treatment in unresectable liver metastases. To date, only small numbers of
LMBC patients are treated with 166Ho radioembolization.
We hypothesize that the addition of 166Ho TARE to systemic chemotherapy can
enhance the response rate of liver metastatic breast cancer patients after
failed initial systemic chemotherapy with an acceptable toxicity level.
Study objective
We aim to introduce 166Ho radioembolization combined with systemic chemotherapy
and investigate its safety and feasibility.
Study design
Multicenter clinical pilot study.
Intervention
Patients start with their newly selected chemotherapy. If no extra-hepatic
tumour progression is seen after their chemotherapy evaluation of the newly
selected therapy, she can be screened for inclusion. A blood sample is taken
and a liver MRI, and a mapping angiography will be performed to evaluate if she
is suitable for radioembolization. If she is suitable for TARE and meets the
inclusion criteria she can be included. The radioembolization will be performed
within two weeks after the mapping angiography. Chemotherapy needs to be
stopped 2-5 weeks prior to TARE and can be continued after two weeks at
earliest.
Study burden and risks
We expect that the addition of 166Ho TARE to systemic chemotherapy can enhance
the response rate a of liver metastatic breast cancer patients and eventually
improve survival in this patient population. It is expected that the combined
use of systemic chemotherapy and TARE has an increased but acceptable toxicity
over the use of systemic chemotherapy alone. With our strict inclusion criteria
we try to select a group of patients that is less prone for toxicity. The
toxicity will be an endpoint of this study. Patients need to visit the hospital
6 times extra for this study and have to fill in three Quality of life forms.
Two extra blood samples will be taken and two MRI's of the liver will be
performed. The screenings investigations and the actual treatment are included
in these 6 extra hospital visits. These procedures are minimal invasive and
will be performed at most under local anesthesia.
Plesmanlaan 121
Amsterdam 1066CX
NL
Plesmanlaan 121
Amsterdam 1066CX
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
• Women >18 years
• Patients with hormone positive and HER2 negative liver dominant metastatic
breast cancer
• No extra-hepatic disease progression at the evaluation of at least second
line systemic chemotherapy
• Suitable for TARE evaluated after the mapping angiography
• Measurable target tumors in the liver according to RECIST 1.1
• Liver tumor burden <50 %
• ECOG performance score 0 to 1
• Laboratory parameters: neutrophils >1000/µL; thrombocyte count >1000000 µL;
eGFR >45/mL/min/1.73 m2; albumin > 3.0 g/dl, bilirubin < 1.5x ULN (unless
Gilbert syndrome); aminotransferase (ALAT/ASAT) <3.0 ULN
• Able to read Dutch
Exclusion criteria
• Life expectancy <=3 months
• Patient eligible for other curative local liver therapy (ea. surgery,
ablation)
• Brain, pleural, peritoneal or extensive visceral metastases
• Other life-threatening disease (i.e. Dialysis, unresolved diarrhea, serious
unresolved infections (HIV, HBV, HCV etc.))
• Contraindication for angiography or MRI
• Significant toxicities due to prior cancer therapy that have not resolved
before the initiation of the study, if the investigator determines that the
continuing complication will compromise the safe treatment of the patient
• Prior or planned embolic intra-arterial liver directed therapy (TACE, TAE,
TARE)
• Prior or planned external or internal radiation therapy of the liver
• Cirrhosis or portal hypertension
• Main portal vein thrombosis
• Intervention for, or compromise of, the Ampulla of Vater
• Ascites (except minor focal ascites)
• Baseline use of analgesics for abdominal pain
• Pregnancy (Women at childbearing potential need at least one form of birth
control) or breastfeeding
• Flow to extra hepatic vessels not correctable by reposition or embolization
• Estimated dose to the lungs greater than 30 Gy in a single administration or
50 Gy cumulatively
• Target tumoral absorbed dose of < 90Gy or an absorbed dose to the normal
liver parenchyma of >50Gy.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL81493.041.22 |