Primary • To evaluate the effects of cebranopadol and oxycodone on respiratory drive.Secondary• To evaluate the pupil response/ pupillometry following single oral doses of cebranopadol and oxycodone• To evaluate the effects of single oral doses of…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
Acute and chronic pain
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
• Ventilatory response to hypercapnia (VRH) by maximum decrease in minute
ventilation (L)
Secondary outcome
• pupil constriction compared to baseline (mm)• Minute ventilation (expired
minute volume; L)
• Respiratory rate (breaths/min)
• Flow rates (peak expired flow; L/min)
• Tidal volume (expired tidal volume; mL)
• End tidal CO2 (partial pressure)• O2 Saturation peripheral (%)
• Analgesic effects will be assessed by:
o Electrical and pressure pain tests measuring the mean:
o Pain Detection Threshold (PDT) o Pain Tolerance Threshold (PTT - only for
electrical pain test)o Area under the curve (AUC)
• adverse event (AE) reporting,
• clinical observations,
• 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) (Heart rate (bpm), PR, RR, QRS, QT, QTcF),
• vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate,• respiratory rate, oxygen
saturation, and
• body temperature), oxygen saturation, and safety laboratory tests
Background summary
Cebranopadol is a first-in-class investigational drug to treat patients with
acute and chronic pain. The molecule dually activates the Nociceptin/Orphanin
FQ peptide (NOP) receptor and the classical µ-opioid peptide (MOP) receptor.
This is a unique mechanism of action (MOA) and has demonstrated efficacy in
multiple Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical studies across several nociceptive and
neuropathic indications as well as a superior safety profile, low potential for
abuse and minimal risk of physical dependence. Cebranopadol could provide a
safer and less addictive option for many pain patients than approved opioids
and the Sponsor intends to develop it broadly for multiple indications.
In animal studies, cebranopadol produced considerably less respiratory
depression at comparable doses of oxycodone and fentanyl and appeared to have a
ceiling to its respiratory effects. Preliminary clinical trials have suggested
that these results will also be present in people.
The present study is designed to investigate if:
1. cebranopadol produces less respiratory depression than oxycodone
2. cebranopadol respiratory effects have a ceiling at supratherapeutic
doses and
3. cebranopadol does not produce significant respiratory depression, as
measured in this study design with 30 subjects, at any dose in the VRH model
Study objective
Primary
• To evaluate the effects of cebranopadol and oxycodone on respiratory drive.
Secondary
• To evaluate the pupil response/ pupillometry following single oral doses of
cebranopadol and oxycodone
• To evaluate the effects of single oral doses of cebranopadol and oxycodone on
the sensitivity of the ventilatory response to hypercapnia
• To evaluate the analgesic effects of single oral doses of cebranopadol and
oxycodone
• To assess safety and tolerability of single oral doses of cebranopadol and
oxycodone
Study design
This randomized, double-blind-placebo-controlled multiple ascending dose
four-way partial cross-over study will investigate the effects of cebranopadol
on the ventilatory response to hypercapnia, nociceptive thresholds,
pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety.
Intervention
- Cebranopadol tablets (strength: 200 µg); single oral doses of 600 µg, 800 µg,
and 1000 µg
- Oxycodone IR capsules(strengths: 10 mg and 20 mg); single oral doses of 30 mg
and 60 mg
- Matching placebo for cebranopadol, and matching placebo for oxycodone
(double-dummy).
all interventions will be over-encapsulated to maintain the blind.
Study burden and risks
Opioids are effective treatments commonly prescribed for pain. However, opioid
pain medications are associated with serious risks including overdose,
respiratory depression, constipation, sedation, and opioid use disorder. As
such, there is an unmet need for well-tolerated and effective therapies,
including opioids with improved safety characteristics, for the management of
pain.
Commonly reported drug reactions for Cebranopadol are sedation, dizziness,
somnolence, nausea and vomiting. Cebranopadol may cause some degree of
respiratory depression. The planned doses are within the therapeutic range and
have previously been safely administered to similar patient populations in
trials.
Commonly reported adverse events for oxycodone are sedation, dizziness, sleep,
miosis, hypoventilation, nausea, vomiting, bradycardia and headache.
Hallucinations and other psychotomimetic effects can occur although more
rarely. Hypotension leading to syncope or shock can occur. Oxycodone may cause
significant respiratory depression. The planned doses are within the
therapeutic range and have previously been safely administered to similar
patient populations both in trials and in clinical practice.
For both opioids used in this study, the occurrence of respiratory depression
is dose- and mu opioid receptor related and can be reversed by a mu opioid
receptor antagonist such as naloxone. Multiple doses of naloxone may be
necessary because the respiratory depression will last longer than the duration
of action of the opioid. Subjects will remain under appropriate surveillance.
Resuscitation equipment and opioid antagonists will be readily available.
Adequate spontaneous breathing must be established and maintained before
discharge.
Nausea and vomiting are expected problems with anesthetic agents and
hypercapnia. Antiemetics are commonly used as pretreatment and treatment during
surgical/medical procedures to healthy individuals and patients. Ondansetron
and metoclopramide have been characterized under conditions of continuous
opioid infusion under hypercapnic clamp. Neither compound interfered with
respiratory assessments or PK when used in conjunction with opioids (Derschwitz
1992, Egan 1996). Therefore, subjects that are screened successfully will be
pretreated with ondansetron 4mg IV prior to IMP dose and approximately 2 h
post-IMP dose. During the study, additional doses of antiemetics may be
provided according to standard on-label dose and dose intervals. Other than
inhibiting opioid-induced nausea and/or vomiting as intended, no significant
interaction is expected between ondansetron and cebranopadol, or ondansetron
and oxycodone.
US Highway 130, Monmouth Junction 2031
New Jersey 08852
NL
US Highway 130, Monmouth Junction 2031
New Jersey 08852
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Signed informed consent prior to any study-mandated procedure.
2. Subject is able to speak, read, and understand Dutch and voluntarily provide
written informed consent to participate in the study.
3. Adult men or women aged 18 to 45 years, inclusive.
4. Subjects are in good health as indicated by medical history, physical
examination, vital signs, oxygen saturation, clinical laboratory tests, and
12-lead ECG.
5. Body mass index between 18.0 kg/m2 and 32.0 kg/m2 and body weight greater
than 50 kg, inclusive.
6. Adequate contraception is being used or women of nonchildbearing potential
may be enrolled if surgically sterile (i.e., after hysterectomy) or
postmenopausal for at least 2 years (based on subject*s report). • For women of
childbearing potential:
o A medically acceptable and highly effective method of birth control is
defined as any form of contraception with a low failure rate defined as <1% per
year.
o For example:
• Hormonal contraceptives for at least 8 weeks prior to screening and at least
until 4 weeks after the Follow-up visit.
• An intra-uterine device.
• Additional barrier contraception should be used by the partner for the
duration of the trial, defined as from the time of screening until 4 weeks
after the follow-up visit. A single barrier method alone is not acceptable.
• For men:
o Subjects must be willing to use medically acceptable and highly effective
methods of birth control. Subjects must be willing to use barrier contraception
(condom) during sexual intercourse with females from the first administration
of IMP until 4 weeks after the Follow-up visit.
o Subjects must be willing to take care that their female sexual partner uses
at least 1 additional method of contraception with a low failure rate defined
as <1% per year (e.g., hormonal contraceptives, diaphragm) during this time.
Exclusion criteria
1. History or presence of clinically significant cardiovascular (incl. a
history of risk factors for torsade de pointes e.g., heart failure,
hypokalaemia, family history of long QT syndrome, history of myocardial
infarction, ischaemic heart disease, clinically significant arrhythmia or
uncontrolled arrhythmia or cardiac failure), pulmonary, hepatic, renal,
hematologic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, immunologic, dermatologic,
neurologic, oncologic, or psychiatric disease(e.g., anxiety); or any other
condition (e.g., hyperventilation disorder), which, in the opinion of the
Investigator, would jeopardize the safety of the subject or the validity of the
study results.
2. History of known difficult airway access or uncontrolled gastroesophageal
reflux disease (GERD), gastric motility disorders, or delayed gastric emptying
3. Has clinically significant abnormalities on ECG at screening or Day -1, as
defined by the following:
a) prolonged corrected QT interval (Fridericia-corrected QT interval [QTcF]
>450 ms in males and >470 in females) demonstrated on ECG;
b) Left bundle branch block at Screening or Baseline
4. Systolic blood pressure (BP) >150 or <90 mmHg or diastolic BP >95 or <50
mmHg at Screening or Baseline, or history of clinically significant orthostatic
hypotension.
5. Heart rate (HR) <40 beats per minute (bpm) or >100 bpm at Screening.
6. Is currently enrolled in another clinical study or used any investigational
drug or device within 3 months prior to dosing or has participated in more than
4 investigational drug studies within 1 year prior to Screening.
7. Has any condition in which an opioid is contraindicated (e.g., significant
respiratory depression, acute or severe bronchial asthma or hypercarbia, or has
or is suspected of having paralytic ileus).
8. Have a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or any other lung
disease (e.g., asthma, bronchitis, obstructive sleep apnoea, exercise-induced
asthma) that would cause CO2 retention.
9. History of opioid use disorder per Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) classification, or other drug/substance
or alcohol dependency or abuse (excluding nicotine and caffeine) within the
last 5 years before Screening, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would
jeopardize the safety of the subject or the validity of the study results
10. Has a positive alcohol test or urine drug screen for drugs of abuse
(amphetamines, methamphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cocaine, and
opioids) at Screening or Day -1.
11. Use of nicotine-containing products within 4 weeks before the Screening
visit and not able to withhold from smoking during the study.
12. Pregnant or breastfeeding.
13. Subjects indicating pain test intolerability at Screening or achieving pain
tolerance at >80% of maximum input intensity for the pain tests.
14. Demonstrated allergic reactions (e.g., food, drug, atopic reactions, or
asthmatic episodes) which, in the opinion of the Investigator, interfere with
the subject*s ability to participate in the trial.
15. Positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibodies
(Anti-HBc), hepatitis C antibodies(HCV Ab), or human immunodeficiency virus
antibody (HIV Ab) at Screening.
16. Use of prescription, non-prescription medications or herbal preparations
containing St. John*s Wort, within 14days or 5 half-lives prior to dosing,
whichever is longer. An exception is made for contraceptives and incidental use
of paracetamol or ibuprofen, which is allowed up to 48 hours before start of
each visit. Other exceptions are allowed only when clearly documented by the
investigator.
17. No vitamin, mineral, herbal, and dietary supplements will be permitted
within 7 days prior to study drug administrations, or less than 5 half-lives
(whichever is longer, and during the course of the study.
18. Any clinically significant lifetime history of suicidal behaviour or
ideation and/or poses a current (within the past12 months) suicide risk, as
assessed by scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at
Screening per Investigator judgment
19. Receipt of blood products within 4 weeks, blood donation or blood loss >250
mL within 8 weeks, or donation of plasma within 1 week of any Study Drug dose
administration.
20. Is employed by Tris, Park, the Centre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), or
the Investigator or study site(permanent, temporary contract worker, or
designee responsible for the conduct of the study), or is immediate family* of
a Tris, Park, CHDR, Investigator, or study site employee. * Immediate family is
defined as a spouse, parent, sibling, or child, whether biological or legally
adopted
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2021-006701-30-NL |
CCMO | NL81080.058.22 |