Primary: To assess the proportion of patients with intervention failure at 12 months after dose reduction, defined as patients who have restarted their initial dose due to (expected) loss of major molecular response.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Haematological disorders NEC
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary objective of this study is to assess the proportion of patients
with treatment failure at 12 months after first dose reduction, defined as
patients who have restarted their initial dose due to (expected) loss of MMR.
Secondary outcome
- The proportion of patients with intervention failure at 6 months after dose
reduction and study end
- Change in outcomes at pre-defined timepoints after dose reduction with
regards to:
o the proportion of patients with (patient-reported) side effects,
including number of side effects (per patient and total) and severity of side
effects using the EORTC QLQc30-CML24 and EORTC symptom list
o Patients* health-related quality of life using the Euroqol EQ-5D-5L
o Patients* beliefs about medicines using the Beliefs about Medicine
Questionnaire (BMQ)
o Medication adherence using the Medication Adherence Report Scale
(MARS-5)
o Healthcare consumption and productivity loss using the iMTA Medical
Cost Questionnaire (MCQ) and Productivity Cost Questionnaire (PCQ)
- Patient involvement during shared decision making will be assessed among
patients using the SDMQ9 and among healthcare providers using the SDMQ-doc
- Patients* level of distress and remorse will be assessed using the Decision
Regret Scale (DRS) and the Decision Conflict scale (DCS)
Background summary
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have proven to be safe and effective in the
treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia. Despite their effectiveness, TKIs are
also associated with adverse events that can decrease patients* quality of life
and increase healthcare utilization and costs. Recent studies have indicated
that dose reduction of TKIs can benefit optimal use by maintaining therapy
efficacy while reducing adverse events and medication costs and increasing
quality of life. These studies have used a one-size fits all approach and dose
reduction was initiated by the healthcare provider. However, the choice for
dose reduction can be considered as a preference sensitive decision as the
preferred treatment option is dependent on personal needs and preferences of
each individual (e.g. treatment goal and the extent of dose reduction). Thus, a
patient-centred approach is needed to meet these needs and preferences.
Study objective
Primary: To assess the proportion of patients with intervention failure at 12
months after dose reduction, defined as patients who have restarted their
initial dose due to (expected) loss of major molecular response.
Study design
prospective, multicentre, single-arm study
Intervention
The intervention is a patient*guided dose reduction. Patients will receive
personalised, lower TKI doses, using an online patient decision aid and decide
upon during a shared decision making consult.
Study burden and risks
A lower dose might be as therapeutically effective as standard dose. We expect
that no more than 19% of the patients will experience intervention failure
after dose reduction. Moreover, we expect that patients who restart their
initial dose will regain MMR or better again. Furthermore, it is possible to
expect some benefits with regards to patient-reported side effects, QoL,
attitudes towards medication (intake), medication adherence due to lower TKI
dose. Also, with this personalised approach, one can expect that patients*
level of distress and remorse concerning their choice for dose reduction is
low. However, investigating whether this will be true is an essential aspect of
this study and will be assessed by collecting patient-reported data.
Reducing the dose induces the risk to lose molecular response. To accurately
monitor the risk of loss of molecular response, an extra BCR-ABL1 analysis will
be performed 6 weeks after each dose reduction and 3-monthly thereafter
according to European guidelines [1]. All BCR-ABL results are seen and
authorized by the treating internist-haematologist. An increase in the BCR-ABL1
transcript levels and possible loss of response is therefore noticed
immediately. Literature show that in case of loss of MMR, resuming standard
dose allows for MMR achievement within 4 months. Therefore, dose reduction does
not endanger patients.
Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10
Nijmegen 6525 GA
NL
Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10
Nijmegen 6525 GA
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Aged >= 18 years
- Diagnosed with chronic phase CML
- treated with a TKI (imatinib, bosutinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, ponatinib,
there are no restrictions regarding using a lower than standard dose at
inclusion, or previously having switched from TKI due to toxicity
- major molecular response (MMR) or better for an uninterrupted period of at
least 6 months at inclusion date
- Able and willing to participate
- Has provided written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
- Inability to understand the nature and extent of the trial and the procedures
required (left at the discretion of the treating physician)
- Previous loss of MMR on a reduced TKI dose due to intolerability
- Molecular or cytogenetic failure to previous TKI
- Previous allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- CML in accelerated phase or blast crisis
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Life expectancy <= 1 year
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2021-006581-20-NL |
CCMO | NL78123.091.21 |