Primary: To assess the efficacy of intracerebral delivery of AAVrh.10SGSH gene therapy (LYS-SAF302) in improving or stabilizing the neurodevelopmental status of MPS IIIA patients after 24 months (main cohort), compared to the expected evolution…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Metabolic and nutritional disorders congenital
- Mental impairment disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint is the observed (post-surgery) evolution of cognitive
developmental quotient (DQ) expressed by the ratio (DQ24/DQ0) between baseline
and 24 months. Actual values will be compared to the ones expected based on
modeling from natural history studies. Cognitive DQ will be assessed by
neurocognitive testing using the Bayley Scale for Infant and Toddler
Development, 3rd Edition (BSIDIII) or the Kaufman Assessment Battery for
Children, 2nd Edition (KABCII), depending on child's age and ability. Primary
and secondary analyses will be performed separately on the main and the
ancillary cohorts.
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints include:
• The change from baseline in the cognitive developmental age (DA) and
cognitive developmental quotient (DQ) assessed by neurocognitive tests (BSID
III or KABC-II) at all timepoints
• The change from baseline in other DA and DQ (language and motor) assessed by
neurocognitive tests (BSID III or KABC-II) at all timepoints
• The percentage of patients with stabilized developmental age (DA) at 12
months and 24 months
• The change from baseline in the total adaptive behavior composite standard
score as measured by the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-II) at 12
months and 24 months and change from baseline in total behavior problem as
measured by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) at 12 and 24 months
• The change in sleep pattern as measured by the Children Sleep Habits
Questionnaire (CSHQ) at 12 months and 24 months
• The change from baseline in the patient/parent quality of life
• The change from baseline in total cortical grey matter volume and white
matter volume on MRI at 12 months and 24 months
• The change from baseline in relevant disease biomarkers in CSF and PBMC
Background summary
There is no disease-modifying treatment currently available for MPS IIIA,
although a number of approaches are being explored.
The rationale for therapeutic approaches in MPS is based on the observation
that delivery of the missing enzyme reverses phenotypic abnormalities in
genetically deficient cells. Although enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is being
explored, it is not currently available for MPS IIIA.
On the other hand, MPS have long been recognized as prime candidate diseases
for gene therapy as it was shown that the missing enzyme might be produced and
distributed to the organism by a group of genetically modified cells.
Indeed, numerous studies in animal models of MPS have described the effects of
genetic modification of tissues including bone marrow, skin, muscle, liver and
brain, resulting in the production of a therapeutically active enzyme.
When vectors are administered in the periphery, the produced enzymes do not
cross the blood-brain barrier. Only very high doses of enzyme in the
circulation may result in detectable transport into the brain.
Due to the predominant neurological involvement in MPS IIIA, therapy must be
delivered to the CNS with a broad distribution throughout the brain to ensure
that deficient enzyme can be sustainably produced where it is most needed.
Study objective
Primary: To assess the efficacy of intracerebral delivery of AAVrh.10SGSH gene
therapy (LYS-SAF302) in improving or stabilizing the neurodevelopmental status
of MPS IIIA patients after 24 months (main cohort), compared to the expected
evolution based on natural history data.
Secondary: To assess the safety and tolerability of intracranial delivery of
LYS-SAF302 and to assess the treatment efficacy on the behavioral, sleep
disturbances of the patients and on quality of life for both patient and
parents.
Study design
The study is interventional, single arm, and multicenter. Evolution under
treatment will be compared to expected natural evolution based on natural
history studies (Shapiro et. al., 2016 and ongoing Lysogene study P3-LYS-SAF).
The main cohort will enroll patients aged >30 months with a 2-year duration
(primary and key secondary efficacy analysis). An interim analysis will be
performed one-year post-surgery. An extension phase will be carried out for an
additional 3-year period for each patient for long-term efficacy analysis and
safety assessment up to 5 years post treatment.
An ancillary cohort will include up to 6 MPS IIIA patients more than 6 months
and less than 30 months of age and followed for 5 years. Interim analysis of
the main cohort at one year post-surgery will not include the ancillary cohort.
The ancillary cohort will be analyzed separately from the main cohort. Initial
analysis of the ancillary cohort will be performed when all patients in the
ancillary cohort have reached 4 years of age.
Treatment will involve direct injections of the investigational product into
both sides of the brain through image-guided tracks, in a single neurosurgical
session.
Patients will receive immunosuppression for at least one year post-surgery.
After surgery, safety and toxicity will be evaluated by regular contact between
the investigators and the families, as well as during in-person visits. At each
visit, clinical progression will be assessed and blood and urine analyses
carried out.
Brain imaging (MRI) will be performed at inclusion (baseline), before and after
surgery, every 3 months during the first year, at 18 and 24-month, and then
annually up to 5 years post treatment. In case hyperintensities are observed at
injection sites, additional follow up safety MRIs should be done every 3 months
until the images stabilize or regress. When required, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
will be collected at the opportunity of MRI and analyzed for disease
biomarkers.
Neuropsychological and behavioral tests will be carried out at baseline, then
every 6 months for 24 months, then every year up to 5 years post treatment.
Safety will be monitored throughout the entire study period.
Intervention
LYS-SAF302 is the adeno-associated viral vector serotype rh.10 (AAVrh.10)
carrying the human N-sulfoglucosamine sulfohydrolase (SGSH) gene (LYS-SAF302),
suspension for injection.
The level of residual enzyme activity collected at baseline and the type of
mutation will determine the duration of immunosuppression treatment.
All patients will receive short-term corticosteroids (Prednisolone 1mg/Kg/day)
for 10 days with initiation the day before surgery to prevent primarily immune
reaction against the vector. In addition, to prevent long-term immune reaction
against the transgene SGSH, all patients will receive:
• Mycophenolate mofetil started 7 days before surgery and for 2 months (8 weeks
post-surgery)
• Tacrolimus started 7 days before surgery and during at least one year
post-surgery
Study burden and risks
Risks of LYS-SAF302 and neurosurgery:
Possible unwanted effects from the surgery and administration of LYS-SAF302 may
include bleeding at the injection site, leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (fluid
that surrounds the brain and spinal cord), bacterial infection of the skin,
swelling of the brain, inflammation of the brain, risk of motor deficit
(muscles not functioning), or uncontrolled movements. If any of these or
something unexpected happens, patient will be treated for any side effects by
the neurosurgeon team and the clinical site investigator.
Risks related to administration of LYS-SAF302 during neurosurgical procedure
are expected to occur within 2 weeks following the surgery.
Following surgery, all subjects have white matter lesions that developed within
3-6 months following intraparenchymal administration of LYS-SAF302. The pattern
of lesion evolution with stabilization in subjects with more than 12 months of
follow-up is consistent with the hypothesis that high levels of expression of
SGSH at the injection site may lead to dysfunction of oligodendrocytes and
astrocytes, resulting in local cystic white matter lesions. To date, no
clinical symptoms have been observed that could be directly attributed to the
observed MR lesions. The MRI findings seem to be self-limiting and clinically
barely manifest. Evolution of the lesions is followed up by MRI on a regular
basis, as per protocol.
Risks associated with anesthesia during the surgery or for the MRI:
Side effects may occur with chloral hydrate as a sedative: Stomach irritation,
bloating, and excessive gas in the stomach or abdomen may occur. Feelings of
great enthusiasm, allergic skin reactions, headache, and the presence of
abnormally high amounts of certain molecules in urine, which are created during
cell break down, have occasionally been reported. Minor side effects such as a
sore throat, nausea, and vomiting, can be common. Major complications from
anesthesia are rare. If you have any concerns, please ask your anesthesiologist.
Risks associated with immune-suppressive agents:
Immune-suppression drugs will be prescribed to lower any risk of reaction to
and rejection of the study medication. These medications (tacrolimus,
mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone) also have known side effects when
administered alone or in combination with each other.
Risks associated with spinal tap puncture and cerebral spinal fluid collection:
In approximately 25% of the patients, spinal tap puncture can cause a
mild-to-severe headache, which may last for several days. Other risks
associated with the spinal tap puncture include pain or discomfort at the site
where the needle entered the spinal canal. Much rarer complications (less than
1% of spinal tap puncture) include meningitis (an infection of the membrane
covering of the spine/brain), bleeding, spinal fluid leakage, nerve damage, and
paralysis (palsy).
Most frequent side effects associated with blood draw:
In addition to unwanted effects, certain procedures may cause pain or
discomfort at the site where the needle enters the skin. Also, a vein becoming
inflamed, or in very rare cases a blood clot (venous thrombosis) cannot be
entirely ruled out. These risks will be minimized by having only qualified
personnel collect the blood. Sometimes blood will be collected when patient is
under general anesthesia.
Most frequent side effects associated with magnetic resonance imaging:
On very rare occasions, patients experienced side effects from the contrast
agent used for brain imaging (MRI); those include nausea, headache, and pain at
the injection site. Very rarely, allergic reactions to the contrast agent
happened with hives, itchy eyes, or other reactions.
Due to the investigational nature of this study, there may be other risks that
are not currently known.
The overall benefit expected for patients is to prevent, stabilize, or possibly
improve the symptoms of the disease. Improvement in patient's behavior as a
result of this therapeutic procedure may be also expected. Most of the benefits
are expected to affect the central nervous system.
Other collective benefit is an increased knowledge about MPS IIIA and this kind
of treatment, and the proposed study should confirm that gene therapy is an
approach for treating MPS IIIA. Any proof of tolerance and safety is highly
likely to be relevant for other diseases involving the central nervous system,
including but not limited to similar diseases, which are characterized by brain
function worsening due to abnormal build-up of various toxic materials in the
body*s cells.
Because people respond differently to therapy and because the study drug is
experimental, no one can predict in advance if patient will benefit.
Boulevard Beauséjour 69
Paris 75016
FR
Boulevard Beauséjour 69
Paris 75016
FR
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Documented MPS IIIA diagnosis based on genotyping confirming the SGSH gene
mutations
2. Age >= 30 months at screening (main cohort) or >= 6 months and < 30 months
(ancillary cohort)
3. Cognitive DQ score on BSID-III >= 50%
4. Signed written informed consent before any study related procedure is
performed
5. Medical status sufficiently stable, in the opinion of the investigator, to
adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol procedures
6. Confirmation by the study neurosurgeon and anesthesiologist of the
feasibility of the neurosurgical procedure.
Exclusion criteria
1. Homozygous for the S298P mutation or non-severe form of MPS IIIA, based on
investigator*s judgement
2. Past participation in another gene or cell therapy clinical trial
3. Past use of SGSH enzyme replacement therapy for a cumulative period
exceeding 3 months. In addition, a washout period of at least 2 months is
required prior to screening
4. Current participation in a clinical trial of another investigational
medicinal product. NOTE: Nutritional supplements, including Genistein are
permitted if they are taken outside the context of an investigational trial
5. History of bleeding disorder or current use of medications that, in the
opinion of the investigator, place them at risk of bleeding following surgery
6. Presence of concomitant medical condition precluding lumbar puncture
7. Presence of any item (e.g., metal braces) precluding undergoing MRI
8. Any condition that would contraindicate treatment with immunosuppressants
such as tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil or steroids
9. History of significant non-MPS IIIA related CNS impairment or behavioral
disturbances that would confound scientific rigor or interpretation of results.
10. Rare and unrelated serious comorbidities e.g. Down syndrome,
intraventricular hemorrhage in the new-born period, or extreme low birth weight
(<1500 grams)
11. History of poorly controlled seizure disorder
12. Any vaccination 1 month prior to the planned surgery
13. Serology consistent with HIV exposure or consistent with active
hepatitis B or C infection
14. Grade 2 or higher lab abnormalities for LFT, bilirubin, creatinine,
hemoglobin, WBC count, platelet count, PT, and a PTT
15. Visual or hearing impairment sufficient, in the clinical judgment of the
investigator, to preclude cooperation with neurodevelopmental testing. Use of
hearing aids is permitted.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2018-000195-15-NL |
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT03612869 |
CCMO | NL65877.000.18 |