The primary objective is to assess whether combination treatment BLM+RTX will lead to reduced treatment failure and the improvement of pivotal, SLE-specific autoimmune phenomena compared SLE patients treated with standard of care.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Autoimmune disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary clinical efficacy parameter is the treatment failure rate during
the 2 years study period.
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints are clinical and non-biased immunological effects of the
treatment summarized as follows: reduction of disease relevant autoantibodies,
in particular anti-dsDNA autoantibody production at 28 weeks, total renal
response rate at 28 weeks, regression of immune complex-mediated excessive
neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation at 28 weeks; sustained,
long-term B-cell depletion during 104 weeks; sustained reduction of relevant
anti-nuclear autoantibodies, including seroconversion during 104 weeks; and
sustained regression of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil
extracellular traps (NET) formation during 104 weeks. Additionally, the study
will perform safety and toxicity monitoring according to Common toxicity
Criteria (CTC) developed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) with the use of
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)and evaluate the
reduction of concomitant immunosuppression and the number of moderate and
severe flares during study follow-up.
Background summary
The SynBioSe-1 study is the first study to comprehensively describe the
clinical and immunological effects of combining rituximab (RTX) and belimumab
(BLM) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). From the pioneering
SynBioSe-1 study, we have learned that combining RTX+BLM was safe and
well-tolerated with important clinical responses. Immunologically, we
unexpectedly observed that long-term B-cell depletion was not achieved due to
migration of mature B-cells triggered by depletion of BAFF serum levels. The
latter observation was in contrast to the study*s null-hypothesis that
combination therapy would lead to long-term B-cell depletion. The contrary was
demonstrated, namely the relative early recirculation of mature B-cells. As
such, the immunological and clinical lessons from the SynBioSe-1 study in
conjunction with accumulating data from several large studies on combination
B-cell targeted treatment have led to the postulation that starting treatment
with RTX+BLM would result in an improved B-cell targeting strategy, notably on
tissue-resident autoreactive B-cells, associated with improved long-term
clinical disease amelioration. Therefore, the present SynBioSe-2 study is
designed to further investigate the long-term clinical and imunological
efficacy of combination B-cell targeting by starting treatment with belimumab
followed by rituximab.
Study objective
The primary objective is to assess whether combination treatment BLM+RTX will
lead to reduced treatment failure and the improvement of pivotal, SLE-specific
autoimmune phenomena compared SLE patients treated with standard of care.
Study design
a multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label study
Study duration: 104 weeks
Intervention
In addition to standard therapy, SLE patients will receive self-administered,
subcutaneous injections of belimumab every week and 2 infusions of rituximab
1000 mg on day 28 (week 4) and day 42 (week 6).
Study burden and risks
There may be a benefit for the subjects participating in this study. The
present study will include severe SLE patients who have highly active disease
who need intensive immunosuppressive treatment with mycophenolate according to
current conventional treatment guidelines. At present, there is no consensus on
the duration of conventional treatment and is continued for many years and
sometimes even life-long. Hence, immunosuppressive treatment is associated with
(cumulative) toxicity and long- term increased risk for infections or
malignancies. Patients randomized to the investigational arm with belimumab
plus rituximab will have the opportunity to taper and even stop
anti-inflammatory treatment with mycophenolate and steroids. Therefore, the use
of belimumab plus rituximab can ameliorate disease activity while potentially
reduce infectious complication as compared to conventional intensive
immunosuppressive treatment.
The risks related to study participation lies predominantly in the side effect
profile of the biologicals used, as extensively described in §6.4. Minor risk
is involved with the placement of an intravenous access needle for truxima
infusions (twice) and the subcutaneous injection of belimumab. At study entry a
renal biopsy is required to diagnose lupus nephritis in those cases where renal
involvement is suspected. The renal biopsy will already be performed as part of
routine clinical evaluation of an patient with the suspicion of lupus
nephritis.
Albinusdreef 2
Leiden 2333ZA
NL
Albinusdreef 2
Leiden 2333ZA
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Subjects enrolled in the study must meet the following inclusion criteria:
1) Adults with the age of 18 years and above,
2) Have a clinical diagnosis of SLE according to the SLICC criteria 2012 (see
appendix 1)
3) Severe, active SLE disease (see also section 5.3.3.2.), defined as a
situation in which 1 or more of the following criteria are met:
a. SLEDAI (SLE Disease Activity Index) with 12 or more points
b. New or worse SLE-related activity of major organs, i.e.: CNS-SLE
(includes NPSLE), vasculitis, nephritis, pericarditis and/or myocarditis,
myositis, thrombocytopenia<60, hemolytic anemia< 4.4mmol/L
c. high disease activity that requires or warrants induction treatment
by switching to or increasing dosage of oral mycophenolate
4) Persisting or progressive disease activity despite the use of conventional
maintenance immunosuppressive treatment (e.g. mycophenolate or azathioprine)
5) Positive for relevant SLE-specific autoantibodies defined as a situation in
which 1 or more of the
following criteria are met:
a. ANA seropositivity, as defined by a positive ANA-titer >= 1:80,
before and at screening :
- Positive test results from 2 independent time points within the
study screening period; OR
- One positive historical test result and 1 positive result during the
screening period. Historical
documentation of a positive test of ANA (eg, ANA by HEp-2 titer, ANA
by ELISA) must
include the date of the test.
b. Anti-DNA seropositivity, as defined by a positive anti-dsDNA serum
antibody >= 30 IU/mL,
before and at screening:
- Positive test results from 2 independent time points within the
study screening period.
- One positive historical test result and 1 positive result during the
screening period. Historical
documentation of a positive test of anti-dsDNA (eg, anti-dsDNA by
Farr assay or ELISA)
must include the date of the test.
6) Female subjects are eligible to enter the study if she is:
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Of non-child-bearing potential (i.e. after hyseterectomy,
postmenopausal, bilateral ovariectomy or
documented bilateral tubal ligation or other permanent female
sterilization procedure)
- Use of effective contraception:
• Complete abstinence from intercourse from 2 weeks prior to
administration of the 1st dose of
study agent until 16 weeks after the last dose of study agent (Sexual
inactivity by abstinence
must be consistent with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the
subject.
Periodic abstinence (e.g. calendar, ovulation, symptothermal,
post-ovulation methods) and
withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception; OR
• Consistent and correct use of 1 of the following acceptable methods
of birth control for 1 month
prior to the start of the study agent, during the study, and 16 weeks
after the last dose of study
agent:
o Oral contraceptive, either combined or progestogen alone
o Injectable progestogen
o Implants of levonorgestrel or etonogestrel
o Estrogenic vaginal ring
o Percutaneous contraceptive patches
o Intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS) with <1%
failure rate as stated in the
product label
o Male partner sterilisation (vasectomy with documentation of
azoospermia) prior to the female
subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner
for that subject. For this
definition, *documented* refers to the outcome of the
investigator's/designee*s medical
examination of the subject or review of the subject's medical
history for study eligibility, as
obtained via a verbal interview with the subject or from the
subject*s medical records.
o Double barrier method: condom and occlusive cap (diaphragm or
cervical/vault caps)
plus spermicidal agent (foam/gel/film/cream/suppository)
• These allowed methods of contraception are only effective when used
consistently, correctly and in accordance with the product label. The
investigator is responsible for ensuring subjects
understand how to properly use these methods of contraception.
• Female subjects using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) should be made
aware that MMF affects
the metabolism of oral contraceptives and may reduce their
effectiveness. As such, women
receiving MMF who are using oral contraceptives for birth control
should employ an additional
method (e.g., barrier method).
Exclusion criteria
Subjects will be excluded from participation if they meet any of the following
exclusion criteria:
1) Active pregnancy, as proven by a positive urine beta-HCG test or a positive
serum beta-HCG
2) Significant hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG < 4.0 g/L) or an IgA deficiency
(IgA < 0.1 g/L)
3) Immunization with a live vaccine 1 month before screening
4) Active infection at time of screening, as follows:
- Hospitalization for treatment of infection within previous 60 days of
day 0 of the study
- Use of parenteral (intravenous of intramuscular) antibiotics (
including anti-bacterials, anti-virals,
anti-fungals or anti-parasitic agents) within previous 60 days of day
0 of the study
- Serological evidence of uncontrolled, active viral hepatitis defined
as: patients positive for HbsAg
test or HBcAb or a positive hepatitis C antibody not treated with
antiviral medication
5) Have a historically positive HIV test or test positive at screening for HIV
6) Have a history of a primary immunodeficiency
7) Have a neutrophil count of < 1.5x10E9/L
8) Have a significant infection history that in the opinion of the investigator
would make the
candidate unsuitable for the study
9) Have a history of an anaphylactic reaction to parenteral administration of
contrast agents, human or
murine proteins or monoclonal antibodies
10) Have any other clinically significant abnormal laboratory value in the
opinion of the investigator
11) Have current drugs or alcohol abuse or dependence within 365 days prior to
Day 0 of the study
12) Have an active malignant neoplasm or one in the history of the last 5
years, except basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin treated with
local resection only or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix treated locally
and with no evidence of metastatic disease for 3 years
13) Have evidence of serious suicide risk including any history of suicidal
behavior in the last 6 months and/or any suicidal ideation in the last 2
months or who, in the investigator*s opinion, poses a significant suicide risk
14) Have any other clinically significant abnormal laboratory value, any
intercurrent significant medical or psychiatric illness that in the opinion of
the investigator would make the candidate unsuitable for the study
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2018-001392-21-NL |
CCMO | NL65720.058.18 |