Primary:• Describe the Data Review Committee (DRC)-adjudicated efficacy of F901318 as treatment for infections due to resistant fungi in patients lacking suitable alternative treatment options.Secondary:• Describe the safety of F901318 as treatment…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Fungal infectious disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary Endpoint:
• DRC-adjudicated overall response rate by pathogen at Day 42.
Secondary outcome
Efficacy Endpoints:
Secondary Endpoints (all by pathogen and also in aggregate)
• DRC-adjudicated overall response at Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 main study phase,
EOT, Day 84 and 4-week FU*.
• DRC-adjudicated and Investigator-assessed clinical response at Day 7, Day 14,
Day 28, Day 42 main study phase, EOT, Day 84 and 4-week FU*.
• Where appropriate for the IFD, radiological response at Day 7, Day 14, Day
28, Day 42 main study phase, EOT, Day 84 and 4-week FU*.
• DRC-adjudicated and Investigator-assessed mycological response by pathogen
and by susceptibility category at Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, Day 42 main study
phase, EOT, Day 84 and 4-week FU*.
• Investigator-assessed overall response (integration of clinical,
radiological, and mycological response) at Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, Day 42 main
study phase, EOT, Day 84 and 4-week FU*.
• All-cause mortality at Day 42 main study phase, EOT, Day 84 and 4-week FU*.
In addition, overall survival (median time
to death) will be presented.
Patients with complete clinical response to study drug treatment will also be
evaluated for relapse of the treated IFD and for newly emergent
IFD at selected study visits up to the main study phase EOT visit (Day 84 to
Day 90).
• If deemed relevant, the aforementioned endpoints may also be summarised by
subgroups judged relevant (e.g., the subgroup of subjects who continued therapy
beyond Day 90 and who thus have only a single combined EOT visit encompassing
Day 84 and EOT).
•Change from baseline during treatment in ECG measured by Holter monitor in a
subset of patient (to be reported separately)
*For patients planning to receive ET beyond Day 90, the Day 84 visit and the
main study phase EOT visit will be combined into a single Day 84 / EOS / EOT
visit on approximately Day 90 and there will be no 4-week FU visit in the main
study phase.
Safety:
• Overall incidence of: - AEs. - Serious AEs (SAE) (including deaths). - AEs
leading to premature treatment discontinuation. - AEs leading to premature
study withdrawal. - AEs by relationship. - AEs by severity (common terminology
criteria for adverse event [CTCAE] grade). - AEs of Special Interest (AESI).
• Changes from baseline during the treatment period and at FU in: - Vital signs
(including weight and body mass index [BMI]). - Clinical laboratory assessments
and incidence of pre-defined abnormalities. - Electrocardiogram (ECG) results
and incidence of pre-defined abnormalities. - Physical examination findings.
• Ophthalmology: external eye exam.
• Changes in concurrent medication dose and/or frequency resulting from
potential DDIs.
• Overall exposure, individual dose modification, dose intensity.
Pharmacokinetics:
• PK data (Cmin; Cmax, Tmax, AUC 0-*au, CL/F and Vz/F).
• Effect of concomitant medication on PK profiles.
Background summary
Invasive fungal infections are a growing clinical concern in many settings but
are especially common in immunocompromised patients, can involve any part of
the body, and are associated with high mortality rates. Current treatment has
limitations including limited dosage forms, DDIs, significant adverse
reactions and resistance.There is a critical medical need for an antifungal
agent with a novel mechanism of action and with high efficacy against a broad
spectrum of fungal species (Section 2.1.1. protocol). Such an agent would have
added value if it were effective by both intravenous (IV) and oral routes of
administration, was well tolerated, and had a limited potential for DDIs. In
addition, a predictable and reliable PK profile would allow well controlled
therapy. F901318 is the first of a new class of antifungal agents with a
novel, well defined mechanism of action, inhibiting a rate limiting enzyme of
fungal pyrimidine biosynthesis, DHODH. Based on the nonclinical efficacy
profile, F901318 may offer an effective treatment in patients with a diverse
selection of fungal infections. In clinical pharmacology studies, F901318 has
been well tolerated when administered at dosages which provide sustained
systemic exposure within the predicted therapeutically effective range. The
present study is designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of
F901318 in patients with IFDs caused by Aspergillus spp, Scedosporium spp. and
other fungal species for which there are limited treatment options available.
Study objective
Primary:
• Describe the Data Review Committee (DRC)-adjudicated efficacy of F901318 as
treatment for infections due to resistant fungi in patients lacking suitable
alternative treatment options.
Secondary:
• Describe the safety of F901318 as treatment for infections due to
Lomentospora prolificans, Scedosporium spp., Aspergillus spp., and other
resistant fungi in patients lacking suitable alternative treatment options.
• Describe the efficacy of F901318 in terms of Investigator-assessed overall
response (integrating clinical, radiological and mycological response).
• Describe all-cause mortality.
• Characterize pharmacokinetics (PK) of study drug and metabolite(s) including
effects of dose adaptations.
• Evaluate dose adaptation and drug-drug interaction (DDI) management
strategies.
• Evaluate the F901318 plasma concentration-QTc relationship by providing data
from time-matched PK samples and Holter ECG recordings
(to be reported separately)
Study design
Open-label, single-arm
Intervention
Treatment: Oral intake of 30mg coated tablets
Dose:
starting dose: 4 mg per kg per day
maintenance dose: 2.5 mg per kg per day
Every 8-12 hours
Max. daily dose is 300mg
Study burden and risks
Subjects will need to come to the hospital more often than they would usually,
and have additional tests. These include physical examination, X-ray/CT/MRI
imaging, ECGs, pregnancy tests, urine tests and blood tests. Possibly there
will be a bronchoscopic assessment if the infection is in the lungs. Subjects
must avoid pregnancy. Subjects must be careful when driving or using machines
(due to the risk of dizziness). Consenting patients participating in the ECG
substudy will complete the visits and assessments as described in the protocol.
In addition, Holter ECG recordings will be conducted at a baseline visit and on
the day of Intensive PK sampling.
There is the risk of side effects.The following side effects that were reported
by some healthy subjects who received the study drug as multiple oral doses
during the studies: blurred vision, diarrhea, nausea, increased liver enzymes,
headache, dizziness and throat irritation or pain. In addition, there is the
risk associated with exposure to X-rays.
Inclusion of patients in this trial is based on the lack of suitable
alternative treatment options to them.
Based on the nonclinical efficacy profile, F901318 may offer an effective
treatment in patients with a diverse selection of fungal infections. In
clinical pharmacology studies, F901318 has been well tolerated when
administered at dosages which provide sustained systemic exposure within the
predicted therapeutically effective range.
Seilerstätte 17/13
Vienna 1010
AT
Seilerstätte 17/13
Vienna 1010
AT
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Male and female patients aged at least 18 years or male and female patients
aged 16 years or 17 years and who weigh at least 40 kg who have been fully
informed and who have given voluntary written informed consent, or whose
legally authorized representative(s) have been fully informed and have given
voluntary written informed consent if applicable and in compliance with local
regulations, OR: Patients unable to write and / or read but who fully
understand the oral information
given by the Investigator who have given oral informed consent witnessed in
writing by an independent person and in compliance with local regulations., 2.
Ability and willingness to comply with the protocol.,3. Female patients must be
non-lactating and at no risk of pregnancy for one of the following criteria:,
a. Postmenopausal for at least 1 year;, b. Post-hysterectomy and/or
post-bilateral ovariectomy;, c. Of childbearing potential, with a negative
urine or serum human chorionic gonadotropin pregnancy test at the Screening
visit and must be using a highly effective method of birthcontrol throughout
the course
of the study period:
i) Established use of oral, injected, transdermal, intravaginal or
implanted hormonal methods of contraception associated with inhibition
of ovulation
ii) Placement of an intrauterine device or intrauterine hormone-releasing
system
iii) Male sterilisation (with the appropriate post-vasectomy
documentation of the absence of sperm in the ejaculate
iv) Bilateral tubal occlusion
v) Sexual abstinence (reliable sexual abstinence is acceptable but
periodic abstinence [e.g. calendar, ovulation, symptom-thermal, or post
ovulation methods] and withdrawal are not acceptable)., 4. Male patients with
female partners of childbearing potential must either totally abstain from
sexual intercourse or use a highly effective means of contraception throughout
study participation and agree to continue its use for 30 days after stopping
study drug., 5. Patients with one of these 4 forms of invasive fungal infection
confirmed by culture or other diagnostic (as agreed with the MM):, a)
Lomentospora (Scedosporium) prolificans (LoPro),, b) Scedosporium spp.,, c)
Aspergillus spp.,, d) Other F901318-susceptible fungi (as described in the IB
or based on information provided by the MM, and in either case requiring
approval of the MM),, OR, e) Probable LRTD IA based on EORTC/MSG criteria
(Appendix 2) but not meeting the criteria for culture proven invasive fungal
infection.
*For further details on inclusion criterium 6, see the protocol footnote, 6.
Patients will also have limited alternative treatment options based on meeting
one or more of the following criteria:, a) Known or predicted resistance of the
infecting isolate to all licensed agents. LoPro automatically meets this
criterion - other fungi may qualify after discussion with the MM,, b) Failure
of available therapy. Failure to improve based on clinical or radiologic
grounds despite receiving >=7 days of standard antifungal treatment AND
alternative licensed agents are either predicted to be ineffective or are
contraindicated,, c) Intolerance to available therapy. Current therapy cannot
be continued due to therapy-related adverse reactions (e.g., increase in serum
creatinine above upper limit of normal with an amphotericin, persistent visual
disturbances with voriconazole, allergic reaction with any compound, or other
recognized drug-related AE) AND alternative licensed agents are either
predicted to be ineffective or are contraindicated, d) Inability to manage
DDIs. Inability to continue current therapy due to DDIs that cannot be managed
AND alternative licensed agents are either predicted to be ineffective or are
contraindicated,, e) Inability to produce therapeutic drug levels. Inability to
produce or maintain therapeutic blood levels with current therapy AND
alternative licensed agents are either predicted to be ineffective or are
contraindicated, f) An IV-only option (e.g., an amphotericin) has produced a
clinical response AND it is standard practice to switch to an oral azole for
completion of therapy AND at least one of the following is true:, i)
Azole-resistance is known based on susceptibility testing of the infecting
isolate,, ii) Azole-resistance is predicted by PCR or similar molecular
diagnostic tool,, iii) Azole-resistance is suspected based on epidemiological
or clinical grounds (e.g., development of aspergillosis while on mould-active
azole prophylaxis; history of lack of response to a mould-active azole at an
early point in the therapeutic course),, iv) An azole would be acceptable
therapy but it is known or predicted that unmanageable DDIs will occur, g)
Other MM agreed inclusion. Patient does not meet any of criteria a) to f), but
treatment with F901318 is judged appropriate by the investigator. Inclusion of
patients based on this category must be agreed with the MM and the rationale
must be documented.
Inclusion Criteria for Extended Treatment Phase
1. Patient has completed 84 to 90 days of treatment with F901318 in the main
study phase.
2. In the Investigator's opinion the patient has potential to continue to
benefit from extended treatment with F901318. The Investigator must discuss ET
with the MM, and the MM must approve ET for each patient.
3.No other alternative treatment option is available.
4. Patient is willing to give informed consent for ET.
5. Patient is willing and able to comply with monthly visits to the clinic for
assessments.
Exclusion criteria
1. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding., 2. Known history of allergy,
hypersensitivity, or any serious reaction to any component of the study drug.,
3. Patients with chronic aspergillosis, aspergilloma or allergic
bronchopulmonary aspergillosis., 4. Suspected zygomycosis (mucormycosis) as the
IFD used to quality for the study. Evidence for the presence of F901318
non-susceptible filamentous fungi such as Mucorales should be urgently followed
up. Increased vigilance for the possibility of zygomycosis is required for
suspected IA with negative baseline GM., 5. Microbiological findings (e.g.,
virological) or other potential conditions that are temporally related and
suggest a different etiology for the clinical features., 6. HIV infection but
not currently receiving antiretroviral therapy.In
cases where HIV infection is first diagnosed at the same time as the
invasive fungal infection, if antiretroviral therapy is commenced at the
time of enrollment, then such patients are eligible for enrollment., 7. Any
known or suspected condition of the patient that may jeopardize adherence to
the protocol requirements or impede the accurate measurement of efficacy (e.g.
neutropenia not expected to resolve, patients with uncontrolled malignancy who
are treatment refractory and receiving only palliative therapy)., 8. Patients
with a concomitant medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator,
may be an unacceptable additional risk to the patient should he / she
participate in the study., 9. Patients previously enrolled in a study with
F901318., 10. Treatment with any investigational drug in any clinical trial
within the 30 days prior to the first administration of study drug except for
unblinded protocols (e.g. open-label oncological regimen variations or biologic
studies). Prior to enrolling patients that are on other open label studies it
is the site*s responsibility to ensure that the study criteria for that study
allow for enrolment into this study., 11. Patients receiving treatment limited
to supportive care due to predicted short survival time., 12. Patients with a
baseline prolongation of QTcF >=500 msec, or at high risk for QT/QTc
prolongation, e.g.a) A family history of long QT syndrome, b) Other known
pro-arrhythmic conditions, c) Risk factors for Torsade de Pointes (e.g.
uncompensated heart failure, abnormal plasma potassium or magnesium levels that
cannot be corrected, an unstable cardiac condition during the last 30 days).,
13. Evidence of hepatic dysfunction with any of the following abnormal
laboratory parameters at Screening:, a) Total bilirubin >=2 x ULN, b) Alanine
transaminase or aspartate transaminase >=3 x ULN, c) Patients with known
cirrhosis or chronic hepatic failure, 14. Prohibited concomitant medications.
Concomitant administration of inhibitors of human DHODH (teriflunomide and
leflunomide) is prohibited. There are currently no other absolutely prohibited
concomitant medications but there are medications with potentially significant
DDIs and the management of potential interactions should be considered before
study enrollment (Section 5.9.1)., 15. Additional exclusion criteria required
by local regulatory or legal order.
- Prisoners or subjects who are legally institutionalized.
- Patients who are not suitable for participation, whatever the reason, as
judged by the Investigator, including medical or clinical conditions, or
patients potentially at risk of noncompliance to study procedures.
- Patients who are dependent on the Sponsor or Investigator or who are deemed
vulnerable for any reason.
- Patients who are employees of the clinical study site or other individuals
directly involved in the conduct of the study, or immediate family members of
such individuals.
- Any specific situations during study implementation/course that may raise
ethics consideration.
Exclusion Criteria for Extended Treatment Phase
1. Patients who are not suitable for the participation in the ET phase,
whatever the reason, as judged by the Investigator, including medical or
clinical conditions, or patients potentially at risk of noncompliance to study
procedures.
Patients who are unwilling or unable to continue the contraceptive measures as
described for the main study phase.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2017-001290-17-NL |
CCMO | NL65316.091.18 |