The primary objective is to compare polyethylene wear at 10 years between a reversed hybrid total hip arthroplasty with vitamin E stabilized polyethylene versus a reversed total hip arthroplasty without the adjunction of vitamin E to polyethylene.…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Joint disorders
- Bone and joint therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary objective is to compare polyethylene wear (mm/year) at 10 years
between the 2 groups.
Secondary outcome
Secondary parameters are:
1. polyethylene wear (mm/year) at 1 and 3 years postoperatively
2. relative decrease/increase in acetabular BMD at 1 and 2 years postoperatively
3. acetabular and proximal femoral osteolytic changes at 1, 3 and 10 years
postoperatively.
4. patient-reported (Oxford Hip Score) and physician-reported (Harris Hip
Score) functional outcome at 6 weeks and 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years
postoperatively.
5. quality of life (SF-36) and physical activity behaviour (SQUASH) at 1, 3, 5,
7 and 10 years postoperatively.
6. survival (number of revisions) determined at 5 and 10 years postoperatively.
Background summary
Uncemented total hip replacement is a widely used treatment in young patients
with osteoarthritis of the hip (age < 70). One of the most important factors
determining late implant failure in total hip replacement is aseptic loosening
of the cup. There is evidence that hemispheric uncemented cups show a higher
tendency in periacetabular osteolysis due to increased polyethylene (PE) wear
in contrast to cemented cups. In addition, in vitro testing of PE cups
incorporated with vitamin E shows good wear and increased mechanical
properties. This is due to the anti-oxidant effect of vitamin E preventing
weakening of the polyethylene after crosslinking. Therefore, cementation of a
vitamin E stabilized PE cup, combined with an uncemented stem (a reversed
hybrid total hip prosthesis) might lead to less PE wear in contrast to the use
of a PE cup without vitamin E.
Furthermore, the influence of vitamin E stabilized PE cups on acetabular bone
mineral density (BMD) is unknown. Hypothetically, it might lead to changes in
acetabular bone mineral density due to different mechanical properties.
Finally, it is hypothesized that less osteolysis will develop in reversed
hybrid total hip arhroplasty combined with vitamin E-stabilized PE cups.
Study objective
The primary objective is to compare polyethylene wear at 10 years between a
reversed hybrid total hip arthroplasty with vitamin E stabilized polyethylene
versus a reversed total hip arthroplasty without the adjunction of vitamin E to
polyethylene.
Secondary objectives are to determine whether there are differences between the
2 groups:
1. in polyethylene wear at 1 and 3 years postoperatively
2. in acetabular bone mineral density at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.
3. in acetabular and proximal femoral osteolytic changes at 1, 3 and 10 years
postoperatively.
4. in patient-reported and physician-reported functional outcome at 6 weeks and
1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years postoperatively.
5. in quality of life and physical activity behaviour at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10
years postoperatively.
6. in survival determined at 5 and 10 years postoperatively.
Study design
Double-blinded randomized controlled trial
150 patients
75 patients reversed hybrid + vitamin E
75 patients reversed hybrid - vitamin E
Intervention
Both investigated groups will receive a total hip arthroplasty (reversed
hybrid: cemented cup and uncemented stem) as is performed in usual daily
practice. The only difference is the adjunction of vitamin E in group 1 to the
polyethylene.
Both groups:
- cemented cup, using Gentamycine cement (Palacos®R+G, Heraeus), applying
modern cementing techniques including lavage and pressurization.
- cementless 28 mm femoral component: a proximally plasma sprayed porous coated
titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) stem (Mallory-Head, Biomet).
Group 1:
- cemented vitamin E stabilized polyethylene acetabular component (Exceed ABT
Cemented Cup System, E1 Antioxidant Infused Technology, Biomet)
Group 2 (control group):
- cemented polyethylene acetabular component without the adjunction of vitamin
E (Exceed ABT Cemented Cup System, ArCom, Biomet).
Study burden and risks
X-rays and/or DEXA-scans will be performed postoperatively as follows: 6 weeks
(X-ray and DEXA-scan), 1 (X-ray and DEXA-scan), 2 (only DEXA-scan), 3 and 10
years (only X-rays). Patients will be asked to fill out questionnaires at 6
weeks, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 year postoperatively.
No extra visits have to be made, except for the DEXA-scans. These will be
performed separately (3 times). The remaining data will be gathered during
standard visits to the outpatient clinic which will take only a few minutes
extra.
Except for the usual risks of a total hip arthroplasty procedure, an extra
(minimal) risk is added due to the DEXA-scans. However, this radiation exposure
is neglectable (one DEXA-scan resembles 2 days of natural background radiation)
van Swietenplein 1
Groningen 9728 NT
NL
van Swietenplein 1
Groningen 9728 NT
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Primary osteoarthritis of the hip
2. Age < 70 years
Exclusion criteria
1. Secondary osteoarthritis of the hip
2. (Active) arthritis (eg rheumatic disease)
3. Peripheral neuropathy
4. History of CVA
5. Cognitive impairments (eg dementia)
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL37132.099.11 |
Other | volgt |
OMON | NL-OMON22433 |