Objectives: Primary: to determine whether SRT reduces the seizure frequency resulting in a reduction of at least 75% (RAEC I-III) in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy when compared to standard of care. Secondary: Assess quality of life (…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Seizures (incl subtypes)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint: RAEC I - III after 2 year of
follow-up.
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints: Seizure frequency, Type epilepsy, Seizure-free days,
Quality-of-Life in Epilepsy (EQ-5D 5 Level, AQOL-8D, QOLIE-31), Serious Adverse
Events (SAE), anti-epileptic drug use, Cost-effectiveness Resource use iMTA
Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ), iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire
(iMCQ), iMTA Valuation of Informal Care Questionnaire (iVICQ)],
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), Patient-reported experience measures
*medische specialistische zorg* (PREM MSZ), neuro-cognition.
Background summary
The PRECISION trial offers a non-invasive, curative intervention for patients
with resistant focal epilepsy who are not eligible for open brain surgery. The
intervention will consist of a single LINAC (Linear Accelateror) based
stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatment and is given by the
radiotherapist-oncologist after detailed localization of the epileptogenic zone
(EZ) together with the neurologist, radiologist and neurosurgeon. This
intervention is not yet available in the Netherlands and is not reimbursed and
in selected patients, who would otherwise be treated palliatively, will offer a
non-invasive curative treatment option as a non-competitive alternative to
epilepsy surgery. It is expected that the health costs for this curative
treatment will not exceed standard treatment, such as lifelong medication and
neuromodulation. A cost-effectiveness analysis is performed for this study.
This analysis also includes indirect costs of the informal caregivers of the
included epilepsy patients in the PRECISION trial. We assume that: SRT is
curative and is a non-inferior treatment option compared with the palliative
standard treatment (ie, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and neuromodulation), for
patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, who are not eligible for
neurosurgery, which will result in a higher reduction in seizures (with 50% of
patients achieving a 75% reduction after 2 years).
Study objective
Objectives: Primary: to determine whether SRT reduces the seizure frequency
resulting in a reduction of at least 75% (RAEC I-III) in patients with
drug-resistant focal epilepsy when compared to standard of care. Secondary:
Assess quality of life (QoL) after SRT, define safety, (serious) adverse
effects, AED use and tolerability of SRT, investigate the cost-effectiveness
(CEA) of SRT compared to standard of care.
Study design
Randomised waitlist controlled trial in which SRT is the intervention and AED
continuation and neuromodulation are the standard treatment with a 1:1
randomization. After 2-year follow up (waitlist) of the controlgroup, patients
are offered the intervention (optional).
Intervention
Intervention: LINAC-based Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT): Target definition:
the target volume is defined as the epileptogenic zone (EZ) on all (non)
invasive examinations of the presurgical trajectory. A single fraction SRT with
a prescribed isotoxic dose of 24 Gy to the 100% surrounding isodose.
Study burden and risks
Benefit-risk balance: It is not known if SRT is superior to the standard
treatment for patients not eligible for curative resective epilepsy surgery
(which is the control group: AED and neuromodulation). For the patients in the
waitlist-control group there is no additional risk, since they receive the
current standard of care treatment during the 2 year waiting/follow-up time.
Also the risk for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is equal. Given
the chronic nature of the epilepsy there is no additional risk.
For the patients treated with SRT the risks are based on the location of the EZ
zone. Information is available from treatment of patients with epilepsy, brain
metastases or benign brain lesions. Treatment related side effect in patients
with epilepsy are based on an update of the review of Eekers et al. 2018.
The most common acute side-effect of SRT is a headache, nausea and/or vomiting
caused by reversible intracranial oedema and can be treated with
corticosteroids. Long-term side-effects include transient neurological deficits
and exacerbation of seizures, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes,
expected and mostly asymptomatic superior quadrantanopia (for lesions treated
in the temporal lobe), ischemic events, cognitive changes [L. Douw et al.,
2009] and radiation necrosis rarely leading to symptomatic oedema or cysts
requiring surgical intervention [N.M. Barbaro et al. 2018], [D.B.P. Eekers et
al 2018].
If the EZ zone is close to the pituitary, potential risks can be estimated from
the literature of treatment of patients with a pituitary tumor. Cerebral
infarction has been described as a long-term complication of stereotactic
radiotherapy of benign skull base tumors, mainly pituitary tumors (SIR 1.48 -
4.2). When treating the amygdala patients may have a similar risk due to the
close relationship with the internal carotid artery [M.G.A. Sattler et al.
2013], [P.D. Brown et al. 2014].
For patients with a pituitary adenoma it is known that hypopituitarism can
occur after conventional and stereotactic radiotherapy in 50% of the patients,
10 years after treatment [G. Minniti et al. 2011], [G. Barrande et al. 2000],
[N.R. Biermasz et al. 2000]. However, in patients with a non-functional
pituitary adenoma population in 37-85% of the patients has already
hypopituitarism at the start of diagnosis [C.E. Higham et al. 2016]. Deficit of
hormone production after conventional radiotherapy of the pituitary with 45Gy
is 45-100% for GH, 18-30% for LH/FSH, 15-22% for ACTH and 25% for TSH [K. H.
Darzy et al. 2009], [P.J. Jenkins et al. 2006].
Location in the eloquent cortex is associated with neurological complications
in patients with brain metastasis, therefore when the location of the EZ is
within the eloquent areas we can limit the dose prescription to 18Gy in order
to reduce this risk.
The possible side effects of SRT will be registered carefully and will be
weighed against the anticipated gain in quality of life. Side-effects from
AED's include nausea and vomiting, ataxia, somnolence and rare, idiosyncratic
reactions. DBS involves the surgical placement of neurostimulators in the
brain, reducing seizure frequency while in the epileptogenic zone, and has
headache, infection, seizure, cerebral haemorrhage, stroke, confusion and
difficulty concentrating as potential side-effects. NVS is performed by
implantation an electrode coil around the left cervical vagus nerve connected
with a subcutaneous lead to the pulsgenerator in a subcutaneous thoracic pocket
reducing the seizure frequency up to 50% in two thirds of the patients with
hoarseness, bradycardia, infection, paraesthesia and dysphonia as known
side-effects [A.D. Farmer et al. 2016].
Dr. Tanslaan 12
Maastricht 6229ET
NL
Dr. Tanslaan 12
Maastricht 6229ET
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Patients:
1. Age >= 18 years
2 Before patient registration/randomization, written informed consent must be
given according to ICH/GCP, and national/local regulations
3. Willingness to use contraception by a method that is deemed effective by the
Investigator during the SRT treatment and for at least 30 days following the
SRT therapy
4.The patient or caretaker is able to keep an epilepsy diary
5. The patient has a diagnosis of epilepsy established by a dedicated
neurologist
6. The patient had at least 3 focal-onset seizures over a 3-month period
despite two or more antiepileptic medication trials (according ILAE Task Force
on therapeutic strategies)
7. Video electroencephalography and work-up in the epilepsy surgery working
group to determine a well-circumscribed seizure focus is available
8. Evidence (e.g. 3T-MRI or a clear SEEG delineation) of the anatomic region to
be targeted with SRT, correlating with the EZ hypothesis;
9. A functional MRI to lateralize language or localize visual, motor and/or
sensory eloquent cortex *has been performed in selected patients (if the lesion
is expected to be located, based on anatomy, in the language areas).
10.The patient has completed a standard battery of neuropsychological testing
11.The patient been deemed an appropriate candidate for stereotactic
radiosurgery by a dedicated Radiation Oncologist and
Neurosurgeon/Epileptologist and referred for the study by one of the Dutch
regional multidisciplinary epilepsy surgery working groups
12. Patients that were rejected for surgery in an earlier stage can participate
in the trial if the last change of the NVS/DBS settings were more than 1 year
ago or NVS/DBS was not (yet) tried.
Informal caregivers:
1. Age >= 18 years
2. Understanding of Dutch language
Exclusion criteria
Patients:
1. Pregnancy
2. If a radiation treatment plan without exceeding the constraints for the
organs at risk is not feasible.
3. Prior cranial radiotherapy
4. If radiotherapy treatment is not possible for diverse reasons.
5. If the subject has clinically significant and uncontrolled major other
medical condition(s) including but not limited to:
- psychiatric illness/social situation that would limit compliance with study
requirements
- any medical condition, with the opinion of the study investigator, places the
subject at an unacceptably high risk for toxicities
- Progressive co-morbidity which limits overall survival.
Informal caregivers:
1. No signed informed consent
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT05182437 |
CCMO | NL84071.068.23 |