Primary Objective:- To compare adenoma detection rate (ADR) with versus without real-time automated detection (CAD EYE, Fujifilm)Secondary Objectives:- To compare the size, morphology and histology of adenomas detected and resected in both arms of…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Malignant and unspecified neoplasms gastrointestinal NEC
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary Endpoint:
- Adenoma detection rate (ADR)
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints:
- Total/mean number and size of detected adenomas
- Detection rate, mean and total number of polyps
- Detection rate, mean and total number of advanced adenomas
- Detection rate, number of adenomas in relation to morphology (accord-ing to
Paris classification)
- Detection rate and number of colorectal carcinomas
- Detection rate, mean and total number of sessile serrated lesions
- Detection rate, total and mean number of proximal serrated polyps
- Detection rate, total and mean number of proximal adenomas
- Detection rate, total and mean number of sessile serrated lesions, ade-nomas
and carcinomas in dependence to the previous colonoscopy re-sult and interval
and underlying pathogenic variant
- Detection rate, total and mean number of sessile serrated lesions, ade-nomas
and carcinomas in dependence to previous CAD EYE experience and/or center
- Mean examination/procedure time with and without CAD EYE system (examination
time and time of endoscopic therapy)
- Specificity and sensitivity of the polyp differentiation mode of the CAD EYE
system
- Occurrence of (serious) adverse events
- Rate of false positives of the CAD EYE system
Background summary
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers, with ~61.000 new
diagnoses and over 25.000 deaths per year in Germany. Lynch syndrome (LS) is
the most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome and accounts for ~3% of
all CRCs. This autosomal dominant disorder is caused by germline mutations in
DNA mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and EPCAM). One in 279
individuals of the general population is a mutation carrier. Thus, almost
300.000 individuals are expected to have LS in Germany. Carriers of pathogenic
variants are at high risk of CRC with a cumulative incidence of up to 70% by
the age of 70 despite regular endoscopic surveillance, and also at elevated
risk to develop metachronous CRC. LS also includes a variety of extracolonic
malignancies. The number of patients identified with LS is expected to rise in
the next years due to the increasing use of universal screening for mismatch
repair deficiency in solid tumors.
For patients with LS it has been suggested to undergo surveillance colonoscopy
every 1 to 2 years. The ade-noma-carcinoma sequence is considered a major
pathway in the carcinogenesis of CRC also in Lynch syndrome. This opens a
window of opportunity for endoscopic surveillance with removal of adenomatous
polyps. It has been shown that advanced histology (high-grade dysplasia;
villous component) was already apparent in adenomas with a size of 2 - 5 mm.
Thus, it is of paramount importance to endoscopically detect and remove
adenomas as early and sensitive as possible before they can develop into
invasive CRC.
Adenomas are considered to represent the main precursors of colorectal cancer
in Lynch syndrome. Due to the accelerated progression from adenoma to CRC in
LS, high ADR is particularly important in these patients to minimize the risk
of carcinoma development. Accordingly, intensified surveillance strategies with
colonos-copies every one to two years have been shown to reduce both CRC
incidence and CRC-associated mortality. However, several studies have shown
that a relevant proportion of adenomas are missed even when examinations are
performed by experienced endoscopists. This is especially true for flat
lesions, which are typical for LS. These missed adenomas are considered a
possible reason why patients with Lynch syn-drome are at very high risk for
post-colonoscopy CRC with a cumulative 10-year incidence of up to 8% despite
endoscopic surveillance. Furthermore, small colorectal polyps in Lynch syndrome
patients have a higher risk of harboring cancer or high-grade dysplasia
compared to an average-risk population.
Epidemiological studies have reported that the cumulative CRC rate at 70 years
among individuals with LS undergoing colonoscopy surveillance can be as high as
46% among MLH1, 35% among MSH2, 20% among MSH6, and 10% among PMS2 pathogenic
mutation carriers. Some authors postulate that some post-colonoscopy CRCs in LS
may emerge from MMR-deficient crypt foci without a polypoid growth pattern and
therefore can be difficult to detect by colonoscopy. However, retrospective
descriptive studies evaluating post-colonoscopy CRC showed associations with
incomplete examination, inadequate bowel preparation, and possible incomplete
resection of lesions.Furthermore, high miss rates for colorectal neoplasia (12%-
74 %) have been reported in several back-to-back colonoscopy studies.
Therefore, it can be concluded that high quality standards for colonoscopy are
not always met in individuals with LS. However, the evidence regarding key
performance indicators for colonos-copy in individuals with LS is limited.
Almost one third (28%) of these small adenomas are missed according to a
recently published meta-analysis. Often the non-polypoid shape hampers
endoscopic detection.
Several approaches have been made to enhance endoscopic detection of adenomas
by using new endoscopic techniques. Conventional chromoendoscopy is conducted
by the use of indigo carmine as pan-colonic dye applied via spray catheter.
This was studied in several back-to-back endoscopic studies as well as two
ran-domized controlled trial comparing chromoendoscopy to standard white-light
endoscopy. The by far largest and well-designed trial by Rivero-Sánchez et al
showed that high-definition white-light endoscopy is not inferior to
chromoendoscopy. The European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE)
states that *the use of chromoendoscopy may be of benefit in individuals with
Lynch syndrome undergoing colonoscopy; routine use must be balanced against
costs, training, and practical considerations*. In individual patient data
meta-analysis of studies comparing chromoendoscopy with WLE endoscopy in Lynch
syndrome for ade-noma detection, chromoendoscopy showed no apparent increase in
adenoma detection.
Several trials have studied the effect of virtual chromoendoscopy
(Narrow-Band-Imaging, Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement,
Linked-Colour-Imaging) on adenoma or polyp detection. The most recent trial by
Houwen et al. showed no effect on polyp detection as the primary endpoint but
on adenoma detection rate as a secondary endpoint.
Limitations in human visual perception and other human biases such as fatigue,
distraction, level of attention during examination increase such detection
errors. A possible way to mitigate these could be another key to improve polyp
detection and further reduce CRC incidence. The use of artificial intelligence
might be a prom-ising approach in this high-risk patient cohort. In recent
years, several clinical trials in the general population have demonstrated that
AI-assisted colonoscopy is a promising approach, showing significant
improvement in the detection of polyps and adenomas compared with standard
white light endoscopy. These auto-mated intelligence systems can be easily
activated via button on the endoscope. It analyzes the colonic mu-cosa
real-time during the examination and signals the detection of a polyp by an
optical and also acoustic signal.
Fujifilm has developed a technology known as *CAD EYE* to support colonic polyp
detection and characteri-zation during colonoscopy, utilizing Fujifilm's
medical AI technology named REiLI (CADE-EYE, Fujifilm, Japan). CAD EYE is a
customized detection and characterization support compatible with the ELUXEO
and ELUXEO Lite system. CAD EYE Detection is activated when the clinicians are
observing in White Light Mode or LCI Mode. When a suspicious polyp is detected
within the endoscopic image, a Detection Box indicates the area where the
suspicious polyp has been detected accompanied by a sound signal. Furthermore,
it is also able to distinguish polyps between *neoplastic* or *hyperplastic* by
their macroscopic appearance.
We have recently conducted a randomized controlled pilot trial, where Lynch
syndrome patients were random-ized to their regular surveillance colonoscopy
either with or without the use of CADe. In the HD-WLE arm, adenomas were
detected in 12/46 patients compared to 18/50 in the AI arm (26.1% [95% CI
14.3-41.1] vs. 36.0% [22.9-50.8]; p=0.379). In this study, we now want to
confirm these results that the adenoma detection rate (ADR) using CADe is
higher than using HD-WLE.
Study objective
Primary Objective:
- To compare adenoma detection rate (ADR) with versus without real-time
automated detection (CAD EYE, Fujifilm)
Secondary Objectives:
- To compare the size, morphology and histology of adenomas detected and
resected in both arms of the study in terms of mean/absolute num-ber and
anatomical localisation (proximal/distal)
- To compare the size, morphology and histology of advanced adeno-mas detected
and resected in both arms of the study in terms of mean/absolute number,
detection rate and anatomical localisation (proximal/distal)
- To compare the size, morphology and histology of serrated polyps (sessile
serrated lesions, hyperplastic polyps, traditional serrated ade-nomas) detected
and resected in both arms of the study in terms of mean/absolute number,
detection rate and anatomical localisation (proximal/distal)
- To compare the size, morphology and histology of polyps detected and resected
in both arms of the study in terms of mean/absolute number, detection rate and
anatomical localisation (proximal/distal)
- To compare detection rate and mean/absolute number of adenomas and serrated
polyps (sessile serrated lesions, hyperplastic polyps, tra-ditional serrated
adenomas) with and without CAD EYE depending on center/previous experience
using artificial intelligence systems
- To compare detection of colorectal cancer with and without CAD EYE
- To compare examination/procedure times with and without CAD EYE
- To assess risks of formation of sessile serrated lesions/adenoma/carci-noma
formation depending on the interval to the last colonoscopy as well as on the
findings of the previous examination and underlying pathogenic variant
- To assess specificity/sensitivity of the polyp differentiation mode of the
CAD EYE system
- To explore false positives lesions by the CAD EYE system
Study design
The study is a prospective, international, multicenter, randomized, controlled,
open-label, two-arm study carried out by experienced endoscopists in expert
centers. Once a subject is determined to be eligible for the study, the subject
will be randomized to one of the two trial arms. Asymptomatic patients with a
diagnosis of Lynch syndrome will be enrolled in this trial. All subjects will
be randomized to 1 of the 2 treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio as described below.
Randomization will be stratified by previous colorectal cancer (yes or no),
underlying (likely-) pathogenic variant (MLH1, MSH2 (EPCAM), MSH6, PMS2),
center, gender (male/female) and interval to last colonoscopy (12-23 months,
24-36 months, index colonoscopies or >36 months). Randomization arms: - Arm 1:
standard high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) without real-time use
of artificial intelligence software (CAD EYE) for polyp detection, but with use
of artificial intelligence software for polyp characterization - Arm 2:
standard high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) with real-time use of
artificial intelligence software (CAD EYE) for both detection and
characterization of colorectal polyps
Study burden and risks
No additional risk or burden associated with study participation.
Venusberg-Campus 1
Bonn 53127
DE
Venusberg-Campus 1
Bonn 53127
DE
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
General inclusion criteria:
- Age >=18 years
- Written informed consent of the subject for voluntary participation in the
study
- Subjects with the ability to follow study instructions and likely to attend
and complete all required visits
Indication-specific inclusion criteria:
- Diagnosis of Lynch-syndrome (presence of a (likely-) pathogenic germline
variant in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2; deletion in the 3` region of the EPCAM gene)
- Surveillance colonoscopy
Exclusion criteria
General exclusion criteria:
- Subject without legal capacity who is unable to understand the nature, scope,
significance and consequences of this study
- Patients with a physical or psychiatric condition / a systemic disease which
at the investigator*s discretion may compromise safety of the sub-ject, may
confound the trial results, may interfere with the subject*s par-ticipation in
this clinical study or may prevent sufficient compliance
- Simultaneously participation in any clinical trial involving administration
of an investigational medicinal product within 30 days prior to clinical trial
beginning
Exclusion criteria regarding special restrictions for females:
- Current pregnancy
Indication specific exclusion criteria:
- Previous extensive colorectal surgery (proctocolectomy or colectomy with
ileorectal anastomosis)
- Recent surveillance colonoscopy within 12 months from current exami-nation
- Symptoms such as rectal bleeding, change in bowel habits, unexplained weight
loss, anemia
- Concomitant inflammatory bowel disease
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
Other | DRKS00030695 |
CCMO | NL83630.018.23 |