Our overall aim is to measure several distinct MR parameters at 0.047 Tesla, and to use these to derive optimal MRI-protocols in terms of contrast and SNR. The images produced will then be compared with those from the commercial Hyperfine system.…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
MR protocol development
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The first study parameters of this project are quantitative measurements of MR
image quality with respect to the commercial Hyperfine system which operates at
a similar field strength. Specifically, we will compare T1, T2, T1*, T2*,
magnetisation transfer and diffusion images in the brain, since these are the
quantities that are in the approved Hyperfine protocol. From this data, we will
perform quantitative analysis (signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise
ratio (CNR)).
In addition, we will develop sequences to look at fat/water imaging in the
human calf muscle/forearm (these cannot be performed on the Hyperfine system
since the closed geometry of the RF coil only allows brain imaging).
The second aim is to investigate a number of different types of image
processing on the image quality, since with our self-developed system we have
complete access to the raw data being acquired. We will quantitate improvements
in image quality in terms of SNR measurements, as well as scoring from our
(neuro)radiologists.
Secondary outcome
None
Background summary
Very low-field (VLF, <0.1 T) portable MRI scanners are emerging as a new
category of systems with much lower costs than conventional MRI scanners and
the ability to be used in sites and applications where conventional MRI is
impossible.
In September 2022 we received approval from the METC to start scanning human
volunteers on a commercial VLF MRI system from Hyperfine, specifically for
protocol optimization for a number of different contrasts. This study has
started and is providing very useful information on how best to set up such
protocols. However, the Hyperfine unit is an expensive commercial system, with
limitations on open software development as well as hardware adaptations, which
places it outside the realm of many low and middle income countries (LMICs),
for example. We have extensive funding from the National Institutes of Health,
the European Research Council and the NWO to develop a VLF system with
increased portability, lower cost and open-source hardware and software which
can be used in LMICs.
In this proposal we intend to study a number of different aspects of VLF MRI.
These studies will be performed in parallel to those on the Hyperfine unit,
allowing comparison of results and optimization of many aspects of the LUMC VLF
unit. In addition to a study to optimize image contrast in the brain using a
number of different MRI techniques, which will parallel the approved study on
the Hyperfine, we will evaluate a number of techniques for enhancing image
quality which cannot be performed on a commercial system, namely:
i) Active noise cancellation
ii) Correction for small drifts in the magnetic field during the scan
iii) Undersampled data collection and AI reconstructions
In addition to neurological measurements, the flexibility of our 0.047 T system
allows other parts of the body to be studied, unlike the Hyperfine system. We
will develop techniques to measure the lipid/muscle content in both the arm and
leg, which can ultimately be used in the estimation of malnutrition in
developing countries.
Dissemination of findings will be performed via articles in world leading
journals on MR techniques. Such developments and publication of results are
common to the MR community, and lead to a continuous development and
improvement of the capabilities of MR scanners.
Study objective
Our overall aim is to measure several distinct MR parameters at 0.047 Tesla,
and to use these to derive optimal MRI-protocols in terms of contrast and SNR.
The images produced will then be compared with those from the commercial
Hyperfine system. Some of these new developments may subsequently be used in
clinical research protocols (which are not a part of this protocol), other
developments are more fundamental technical MR developments for which
applications will only benefit in the future.
Study design
Only projects aiming at the development, optimization and/or interpretation of
non-invasive MR techniques are included. MRI-protocol development will follow
the usual roadmap of MR physics research that consists of an iterative process
of identification of new requirements or artefacts in existing techniques,
MRI-protocol optimization, sequence development, pilot experiments, quality
review meetings, and finally back to identification of sources of artefacts.
For each of the studies (noise cancellation, data undersampling, SNR
comparisons for six different MR contrast mechanisms, and development of
lipid/muscle ratios we will scan 20 healthy volunteers (total number=240) to
publish results of these new protocols/sequences.
Study burden and risks
All of the issues concerning safety and risk at 0.047 T are much lower than the
corresponding considerations at clinical MRI field strengths (1.5 and 3T).
Projectile forces are proportional to the magnetic field multiplied by the
spatial gradient of the magnetic field, as so are ~30 and 60 times less than
1.5T and 3T respectively, power deposition in the subject is proportional to
the square of the magnetic field, so is ~900 and 3600 times less than at 1.5T
and 3T. The scans are almost silent, no special clothing is needed, and the
environment is much less claustrophobic than for a conventional MRI scan. Many
thousands of scans have been performed on both patients and healthy volunteers
on VLF scanners with field strengths of 0.08 and 0.064 T.
Albinusdreef 2
Leiden 2333ZA
NL
Albinusdreef 2
Leiden 2333ZA
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Healthy volunteers between the age >18 years or <65 years
Exclusion criteria
- Age <18 years or >65 years
- Persons with reduced mental capacity
- Pregnancy and a chance of being pregnant (as reported by the volunteer)
- Not having a general practitioner
- MRI contraindication e.g. cardiac pacemaker, implants not approved for MRI
(see www.mrisafety.com), claustrophobia, tinnitus.Decision on the MRI
contraindication is made according to the guidelines outlined in the MR safety
document of the Department of Radiology which can be found in the attachment
(*MRI Veiligheidsrichtlijnen LUMC (BPPC-protocol)*).
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL83272.058.22 |