Our primary aim is to develop methods and assess the feasibility of creating a participant-specific biomechanical model of the knee that integrates biomechanics data with dynamic computed tomography (CT) imaging data to determine 3D tibiofemoral and…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
no pathology evaluated in this study, healthy participants only
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Through a complete knee flexion/extension cycle, we will quantify: dynamic 3D
force vectors in tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints.
Secondary outcome
Through a complete knee flexion/extension cycle, we will quantify: dynamic
cartilage stress distributions in tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints; and
skin artefact.
Background summary
OA is expected to be the most prevalent disease in the Netherlands by 2040 .
The knee is the most common joint affected by OA, and knee OA is responsible
for more physical disability than any other disease among older adults. Knee OA
is predominantly held to be caused by biomechanical factors that lead to
increases in cartilage stress. Current methods used to evaluate knee
biomechanics contain substantial error due to factors such as skin motion
artefact, and often ignore biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint, preventing
accurate estimates of cartilage stress. Novel methods are urgently needed to
quantify both tibiofemoral and patellofemoral movements and forces in order to
accurately and precisely measure knee cartilage stress.
Study objective
Our primary aim is to develop methods and assess the feasibility of creating a
participant-specific biomechanical model of the knee that integrates
biomechanics data with dynamic computed tomography (CT) imaging data to
determine 3D tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint force vectors. Our secondary
aims are to quantify knee cartilage stress distributions as a function of boney
alignment, movement and forces; and to quantify skin motion artefact during
knee movements.
Study design
This technical development uses a cross-sectional observational design
involving not more than five volunteers
Study burden and risks
Participants will visit two locations for complete data analysis, in total
requiring approximately 2 hours of their time plus travel. Dynamic CT scans
will be acquired at IJssellandziekenhuis, this session takes approximately 45
minutes. The CT scan protocol will give a very low total dose of radiation of
approximately 0.5 mSv, the risk of this dosage is negligible. For comparison, a
normal CT scan of the hip is 3 mSv and the thorax is 18 mSv (22). The yearly
exposure to radiation from natural sources in the Netherlands is approximately
2 mSv. Biomechanics data collection will take place at TU Delft, this session
takes approximately 75 minutes. Participants will be asked to perform 3 to 5
trials each of simple tasks: slowly bending and straightening their knee,
squatting, and walking at a self-selected pace. These are tasks well within
what would be considered a usual daily activity, and the risk is thus
negligible.
Doctor Molewaterplein 40
Rotterdam 3015 GD
NL
Doctor Molewaterplein 40
Rotterdam 3015 GD
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Age 18 - 65 years old
Asymptomatic knees
Provide written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Neurological conditions
Rheumatic conditions
Currently undergoing treatment for cancer
Musculoskeletal injuries affecting the lower extremities
Pain in the foot, ankle, knee, hip or low back
Pregnancy
Any other contraindications to radiation exposure
Unable to speak, read and write in Dutch
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL76580.078.21 |