The aim of this study is to investigate whether VR will decrease the request for labour analgesia. Primary outcome measure:* Request for labour analgesiaSecondary outcome measures:* Patient tolerability, feasibility and satisfaction of VR use (VR-…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Pregnancy, labour, delivery and postpartum conditions
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary outcome is the reduction of request for labour analgesia.
Secondary outcome
Secondary outcomes are the effect of VR on patient satisfaction of VR use
(questionnaire), patient reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient reported
experience measure (PREM) as defined by international consortium for health
outcome measures (ICHOM), health-technology assessment analysis (HTA).
Background summary
Labour pain is the result of many complex interactions and can be regarded as
one of the most serious kinds of pain. During labour, 80-90% of the women
experience pain of which 65-68% rated labour pain as severe or extremely
severe. Labour pain management strategies include non-pharmacological and
pharmacological interventions. Pharmacological methods for pain relief during
labour include inhaled analgesia (Entonox; N2O), opioids, non-opioids drugs,
local anaesthetic nerve blocks, and epidural and intrathecal injections of
local anaesthetics or both. Epidural analgesia (EA) is the most effective
method for pain relief during labour.
In 2019, 33% of the women in The Netherlands received EA during labour.
Unintended adverse effects also accompany EA, like maternal fever, hypotension,
urinary retention, motor blockade and routine EA is likely to lead to more
operative deliveries. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia
(remifentanil-PCA) has also been frequently (18%) used as pain relief during
labour in The Netherlands [perined 2019]. Possible side effects of remifentanil
are pruritus, nausea, hyperalgesia, desaturation, respiratory depression and
apnea.
Relatively common (well-known) non-pharmacological interventions for pain
relief are continuous psychological support, alternating positions during
labour, intracutaneous or subcutaneous sterile water injections, transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulation, hypnosis, biofeedback, immersion in water,
aromatherapy, relaxation techniques (yoga, audio, music), acupuncture or
acupressure and manual methods (massage, reflexology). An alternative, at the
moment not common, non-pharmacological method is the use of virtual reality
(VR).
Taking into account the safety and possible adverse effects of current
pharmacological pain relief during labour, it is worth exploring VR as a
non-pharmacological pain relief to avoid the possible side effects of
pharmacological methods for pain relief and decrease health care costs.
VR is an upcoming technology used within healthcare, which makes use of the
principle of distraction. Pain perception is strongly affected by psychological
factors.
The Neuromatrix Theory of Pain states that pain is a multidimensional
experience, consisting of affective, sensory and cognitive components. The
perception of pain is thought to be related to the amount of attention that is
given to pain stimuli.
Recently a systematic review and meta-analysis showed VR to be an effective
method to reduce acute pain. There is limited evidence of the use of VR during
labour. An observational study investigated the effect of music in 62 women
during labour and showed a significant reduction of pain and anxiety. In the
VRAIL pilot study, a preliminary randomised controlled trial, 28 women in
labour were enrolled. This study showed a significant decrease in pain and
anxiety during labour in the VR-group. This preliminary and scarce literature
suggests that VR is a potentially effective technique for improving pain and
anxiety during labour. VR can be used as a safe, non-invasive, analgesic
method, without risks of drug addiction and minimal side effects.
A recent qualitative study (VIREL) investigated the experience and preference
and the effect on pain intensity during labour of interactive and passive
virtual reality distraction. Women experienced less pain during meditation VR
use and preferred the guided meditation VR during labour.
In this study, we want to investigate the effect of meditation VR (BirthVR) on
the request for labour analgesia. We hypothesize that VR will reduce the
request for labour analgesia and reduce the rate of referral rate from
midwifery led first line care to second line obstetrical care.
Study objective
The aim of this study is to investigate whether VR will decrease the request
for labour analgesia.
Primary outcome measure:
* Request for labour analgesia
Secondary outcome measures:
* Patient tolerability, feasibility and satisfaction of VR use
(VR-questionnaire, WDEQ-A and WDEQ-B)
* Patient reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient reported experience
measure (PREM) as defined by international consortium for health outcome
measures (ICHOM)
* Labour complications, neonatal parameters
Study design
The study concerns a non-blinded multi centre, randomised controlled trial
(RCT).
Eligible patients will be randomised to either the VR group or standard care
group. In addition to the standard care, the VR group receives a VR information
moment during labour and the possibility to exercise with the VR glasses and
they receive VR during labour from the moment they are in active labour and use
VR as much as they prefer. Our hypothesis is that using *BirthCoach VR* during
labour will result in a 15% decrease in the request for labour analgesia. In
general multiparous women less often receive medicinal pain relief than
nulliparous women. This statement is also supported by national and local data.
This difference in incidence results in a different effect size. For this
reason, two separate sample sizes for multi- and nulliparous have been
calculated
Intervention
BirthVR tool; a virtual reality app consisting of nature environments with a
guided meditation.
Study burden and risks
VR is a new technique for labour pain reduction. We performed a qualitative
study (VIREL) in 23 women during labour to explore the feasibility of VR. This
study showed a reduction of pain measured on the visual analogue scale (VAS) of
19 mm after the use of VR during labour. There were no adverse events after the
use of VR during labour. They can experience side-effects of VR for example
dizziness or nausea.
Henri Dunantstraat 5
Heerlen 6419 PC
NL
Henri Dunantstraat 5
Heerlen 6419 PC
NL
Listed location countries
Inclusion criteria
* Written and orally given informed consent
* 18 years and older
* Good command of Dutch language
* Singleton pregnancy
* Nulliparous or multiparous women
* Cephalic presentation
* 35+0 weeks* gestation and beyond
* Intention for a vaginal delivery
* Delivery in the Zuyderland MC
Exclusion criteria
* Chronic pain. The pain is not due to an obstetrical problem. * Chronic use of
pain medication (opioids) * Alcohol or drug abuse * Known car sickness which
requires the use of medication * Epileptic insults in previous history *
Psychotically episode in previous history * Claustrophobic * Visual impairment
(excluding the use of glasses and/or lenses * psychotic disorder * Patients in
strict isolation (MRSA) * Age <18 years * Twin pregnancy * No good command of
Dutch language
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL76837.096.21 |