This study has been transitioned to CTIS with ID 2024-516414-38-00 check the CTIS register for the current data. Part APrimary objective1. To determine the equivalence of the Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) of the reduced, boosted dose of olaparib and…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Ovarian and fallopian tube disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Part A
1. AUC0-12h for the regular and boosted olaparib will be determined using
non-compartmental analysis for the primary objective. Hereto, multiple PK
samples will be collected after one week of each treatment regimen at the
following times: pre-dose, *, 1, 1*, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours after olaparib intake.
If possible, additional PK samples will be taken after 10 and 12 hours.
Part B
1. Progression-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until
the date of either objective radiological disease progression or biochemical
progression combined with clinical progression or death;
o Objective radiological disease progression will be assessed according to
RECIST version 1.11
o Biochemical disease progression will be assessed with serum CA-125 according
to the GCIG criteria;
o Clinical progression will be assessed by treating physician;
2. The number of patients who require a dose reduction due to toxicity will be
registered.
Secondary outcome
Part A
1. Inter- and intrapatient variability in olaparib pharmacokinetics with and
without cobicistat is calculated using non-compartmental analysis of PK data;
2. Adverse events and laboratory safety will be monitored and scored according
to the CTCAEv5.0 to describe the safety of boosted olaparib treatment.
Part B
1. Health status and satisfaction of patients will be monitored with the CTSQ
and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires;
2. ctDNA will be determined from plasma samples;
3. Adverse events and laboratory safety will be monitored and scored according
to the CTCAEv5.0 to describe the safety of boosted olaparib treatment;
4. Costs for the cost-effectiveness analysis will be assessed by the iMTA
Productivity Cost Quetstionnaire (iPCQ) and iMTA Medical Consumption
Questionnaires (iMCQ). Health status will be monitored with the EQ-5D-5L
questionnaire.
Background summary
Olaparib (Lynparza®) is a poly-adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP)
inhibitor, originally used for the maintenance treatment of women with
platinum-sensitive relapsed Breast Cancer gene (BRCA)-mutated high grade
serious epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer, who are in
response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Over the last two years, several
therapeutic indications have been added to the drug label, such as first-line
platinum-sensitive BRCA-mutated high grade serious epithelial ovarian,
fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer, germline BRCA1/2-mutated, Human Epidermal
growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast
cancer and BRCA1/2-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, who
have progressed following prior therapy. Since olaparib is very expensive
(~¤5700/month), this increase of treatment population will have a significant
impact on health care expenditures.
To keep healthcare affordable and accessible for all patients, innovative
strategies are warranted to reduce the dose of expensive drugs, without
reduction of efficacy. For olaparib, pharmacokinetic (PK) boosting can be
applied. PK boosting is the lay term for administering a non-therapeutic active
strong inhibitor of a metabolic enzyme, for example cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A),
together with a therapeutic drug that is metabolized by the same enzyme.
Boosting thus increases the concentration of the therapeutic drug and allows
lower doses to be administered to patients. Hence, coadministration of a
reduced dose of olaparib with cobicistat (Tybost®), a non-therapeutic, strong
inhibitor of the CYP3A can lead to equivalent exposure to olaparib.
Furthermore, inhibition of CYP3A could lead to less PK variability since
metabolic capacity is a prominent cause for (intra- and inter-individual)
variability in systemic exposure. Predictable olaparib exposure will reduce the
number of patients who are unintentionally under- or overtreated. Lastly, tumor
tissue itself may express CYP3A as a detoxification or resistance mechanism.
Theoretically, PK boosting may also overcome CYP3A-mediated drug resistance.
Study objective
This study has been transitioned to CTIS with ID 2024-516414-38-00 check the CTIS register for the current data.
Part A
Primary objective
1. To determine the equivalence of the Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) of the
reduced, boosted dose of olaparib and the regular dose.
Secondary objectives
1. To determine whether boosting reduces the inter- and intrapatient PK
variability of olaparib;
2. To describe the safety of boosted olaparib.
Part B
Primary objectives
1. To determine if efficacy by progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with
high grade ovarian cancer receiving olaparib maintenance therapy who are in
response following completion of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy,
treated with the lower boosted dose of olaparib is non-inferior to patients
treated with the regular dose of olaparib;
2. To determine if tolerance by dose reductions due to toxicity in patients
treated with the lower boosted dose of olaparib is non-inferior to patients
treated with the regular dose of olaparib.
Secondary objectives
1. To investigate whether health status, tolerance and satisfaction of patients
treated with the boosted low dose olaparib is comparable to patients treated
with the regular dose of olaparib;
2. To evaluate whether treatment response of boosted versus regular olaparib
can be determined with cell-free tumor nucleic acids (ctDNA) as pharmacodynamic
biomarker;
3. To describe toxicity of the lower boosted dose of olaparib compared to the
regular dose of olaparib;
4. To compare cost-effectiveness of the lower boosted dose of olaparib compared
to the regular dose of olaparib.
Study design
Part A
A multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover, drug-drug interaction study
in 18 patients.
Part B
A multicenter randomized, open-label, non-inferiority study in 142 patients.
Intervention
The comparator treatment is the regular dose of olaparib tablets 300 mg BID,
250 mg BID or 200 mg BID based on the patient's condition and physician's
discretion.
The investigational treatment is the reduced dose of olaparib tablets 100 mg
BID, 150 mg OD or 100 mg OD, combined with the PK booster cobicistat 150 mg
BID.
Study burden and risks
A possible benefit of the intervention is less pharmacokinetic variability in
the group treated with the boosted olaparib dose.
The risk associated with this study are limited, since both treatment regimens
(comparator and intervention) are according to the drug label of olaparib.
Although the exposure to olaparib is increased in the interventional treatment
arm in part A compared to monotherapy, the boosted exposure was comparable to
an average exposure to olaparib in an unselected pupation. Therefore, the
additional risks due to side effects in the interventional treatment arm in
part B is considered negligible. Many patients treated with olaparib experience
side effects. These side effects are considered mild and easily manageable with
dose reductions. The most common side effects are bone marrow depressions which
- when adequately managed - do not interfere with the quality of life of
patients. Since all patients will be adequately monitored in line with standard
care, the additional risk for side effects in the interventional treatment arm
is expected to be comparable to the comparator arm.
The burden for subjects participating in this study is mainly time-investment
associated with the study visits, additional questionnaires, the additional
number of blood samples in part A of the study and tumor biopsies if consented
in part B of the study. The majority of participating will have to take an
additional drug, cobicistat, which increases burden of medication intake. In
these subjects, we will carefully evaluate potential drug interactions to
guarantee safety.
Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10
Nijmegen 6525GA
NL
Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10
Nijmegen 6525GA
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Part A - proof of concept
• Subjects who start or are on treatment with olaparib tablets, according to
the drug label and physician*s discretion;
• Subjects who are able and willing to provide written informed consent prior
to screening;
• Age of 18 years or older;
• Able to measure the outcome of the study in this subject (e.g. patient
availability; willing and being able to undergo repeated plasma sample
collection);
• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1.
Part B - clinical evaluation
• Subjects who start on treatment with olaparib tablets, according to the drug
label and physician*s discretion;
• Subjects who are able and willing to provide written informed consent prior
to screening;
• Age of 18 years or older;
• Able to measure the outcome of the study in this subject (e.g. patient
availability; willing and being able to undergo sample collection for PK and PD
purposes);
• Expected to be on olaparib treatment for >= 3 months;
• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-3.
Exclusion criteria
Part A + B
• Concurrent use of other anti-cancer therapies;
• Concurrent use of potent inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4 as assessed with
the KNMP *G-standaard*;
• Known contra-indications for treatment with cobicistat in line with the
summary of product characteristics;
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EU-CTR | CTIS2024-516414-38-00 |
EudraCT | EUCTR2021-004032-28-NL |
CCMO | NL78695.091.21 |