This study has been transitioned to CTIS with ID 2024-515604-39-00 check the CTIS register for the current data. The purpose of this research study is to learn about the safety and effectiveness of 177Lu-PNT2002, an investigational agent being…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Miscellaneous and site unspecified neoplasms malignant and unspecified
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary Efficacy Objective:
To determine the efficacy of 177Lu-PNT2002 versus abiraterone or enzalutamide
in delaying radiographic progression in patients with mCRPC who have progressed
on ARAT.
Primary Endpoint:
Radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) assessed by Blinded Independent
Central Review (BICR) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
(RECIST) 1.1 (soft tissue) and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) (bone)
criteria.
Secondary outcome
Secondary Efficacy Objectives:
• To assess the radiographic response to 177Lu-PNT2002 versus abiraterone or
enzalutamide.
• To determine the effect of 177Lu-PNT2002 versus abiraterone or enzalutamide
on overall survival in patients who have progressed on ARAT.
• To determine the effect of 177Lu-PNT2002 versus abiraterone or enzalutamide
on developing a symptomatic skeletal-related event.
• To determine the effect of 177Lu-PNT2002 versus abiraterone or enzalutamide
on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics in patients who have progressed on
ARAT.
Secondary Endpoints:
• Objective response rate (ORR): proportion of patients with partial or
complete response (PR or CR, respectively) by BICR based on RECIST 1.1 criteria
(soft tissue) and PCWG3 criteria (bone).
• Duration of response: time from the first date of CR or PR by BICR to the
first occurrence of radiographic progression (PD) by BICR based on
PCWG3-modified RECIST 1.1 or death in the absence of progression
• Overall survival (OS): time from randomization to date of death from any cause
• Time from randomization to first symptomatic skeletal-related event.
• PSA response rate according to PCWG3 criteria (first occurrence of a 50% or
more decline in PSA from baseline, confirmed by a second measurement at least 3
weeks later).
• Biochemical progression-free survival: time from randomization to the date of
the first PSA increase from baseline >=25% and >=2 ng/mL above nadir confirmed by
a second PSA measurement defining progression >=3 weeks later per PCWG3.
Safety Objective
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of 177Lu-PNT2002 versus abiraterone or
enzalutamide.
Safety Endpoints:
• Frequency and severity of adverse events and serious adverse events using
CTCAE v. 5.0.
• Changes from baseline in physical exam findings, vital signs, clinical
laboratory values, and electrocardiogram (ECG) values.
• Number of patients discontinuing study drug due to adverse events.
Background summary
Advanced prostate cancer remains the ultimate challenge in terms of reducing
prostate cancer specific mortality. Significant strides have been made over the
past decade in terms of life-extending therapies, has dramatically altered
outcomes for men with advanced disease.
In recent years, the advent of androgen receptor axis targeted therapy (ARAT)
has demonstrated benefit to patients in the non-metastatic CRPC state (i.e.,
darolutamide, apalutamide, enzalutamide) as well as the metastatic CRPC state
(i.e., abiraterone, enzalutamide. As a result, ARATs have been established as a
preferred first-line therapy for CRPC. However, despite advances these new
agents have offered, overall survival (OS) of approximately 3 years in patients
starting early treatment remains short, and there is an urgent need for
alternative therapy. Once patients progress on the first-line ARAT, current
treatment choices remain limited to an alternative therapy. Despite these
options, they are not suitable or indicated for many men with mCRPC and overall
survival remains limited.
Thus, there is an urgent medical need for an effective therapeutic option with
a modality of novel mechanism of action.
Study objective
This study has been transitioned to CTIS with ID 2024-515604-39-00 check the CTIS register for the current data.
The purpose of this research study is to learn about the safety and
effectiveness of 177Lu-PNT2002, an investigational agent being studied for
patients with mCRPC who have experienced disease progression following
treatment with abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, or darolutamide.
177Lu-PNT2002 is a radiopharmaceutical investigational drug, meaning that it
has not been approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the
United States (US), Health Canada, or any other country. This means that it can
only be used in research studies.
177Lu-PNT2002 targets a specific protein that is located on the surface of
prostate cancer cells, called prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA).
177Lu-PNT2002 delivers radiation to your cancer by binding to the PSMA, which
helps to destroy the cancer cells. In previous research with 177Lu-PNT2002,
data has been shown to reduce PSA levels and may have fewer side effects and
less impact on quality of life compared to current standard treatments. This
research study will examine the safety and effectiveness of 177Lu-PNT2002
compared to the use of standard treatments alone.
Study design
The SPLASH study is a phase 3 multicenter, open-label, randomized trial with a
safety and dosimetry lead-in phase evaluating the efficacy and safety of novel
PSMA targeted radioligand 177Lu-PNT2002 in patients with mCRPC who have
progressed on ARAT therapy.
The study consists of 3 phases: Dosimetry, Randomized Treatment, and Long-term
Follow-up.
Intervention
The study consists of 3 phases: Dosimetry, Randomized Treatment, and Long-term
Follow-up.
Dosimetry Phase
The objective of the Dosimetry Phase is to evaluate dosimetry in all standard
organs, including the kidneys, salivary glands, and lacrimal glands. Individual
dosimetry estimates and summary statistics will be generated by a central
dosimetry core laboratory.
Prior to entry into the Dosimetry Phase, patients will sign an Informed Consent
Form (ICF) and undergo screening procedures including a PSMA-PET scan. A total
of 25 patients who meet all eligibility requirements will be administered 6.8
GBq (±10%) of 177Lu-PNT2002 every 8 weeks for 4 cycles
Randomized Treatment Phase
Once dosimetry and safety data are generated to confirm the selected dose meets
pre-specified criteria outlined in Section 5.7.2 and the DSMB has provided an
approval to proceed, the Randomized Treatment Phase will commence. The
randomized treatment phase will open to US sites after all patients in the
dosimetry phase have completed the treatment follow-up period (i.e. 8 weeks
after last dose) or earlier if FDA agreement is obtained. Patients will sign an
ICF and undergo screening procedures including a PSMA-PET scan. Randomization
will occur in a 2:1 ratio in the following groups:
• Arm A, in which approximately 260 patients will receive 177Lu-PNT2002
(6.8 GBq (±10%) every 8 weeks for 4 cycles).
• Arm B, in which approximately 130 patients will receive enzalutamide
(160 mg orally qd) or abiraterone (1000 mg orally qd with: 5 mg bid
prednisone or 0.5 mg qd dexamethasone).
Long-Term Follow-up Phase
The Long-Term Follow-up Phase for all patients consists of a phone call or a
planned clinic visit every 3 months to assess survival status, late-radiation
related toxicities (for patients who received 177Lu-PNT2002), new anti-cancer
therapies, and progression following any new therapy for at least 5 years from
C1D1 (if patients crossover, 5 years from the first dose of 177Lu-PNT2002),
death, or loss to follow-up.
Study burden and risks
Risks which are associated with the study drug and procedures are described in
details in the main patient Information sheet and
informed consent form.
4850 West 78th Street
IN 46268 Indianapolis
US
4850 West 78th Street
IN 46268 Indianapolis
US
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Male aged 18 years or older.
2. Histological, pathological, and/or cytological confirmation of
adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
3. Ineligible or averse to chemotherapeutic treatment options.
4. Patients must have progressive mCRPC at the time of consent based on at
least 1 of the following criteria:
a. Serum/plasma PSA progression defined as increase in PSA greater than 25% and
>2 ng/mL above nadir, confirmed by progression at 2 time points at least 3
weeks apart.
b. Soft-tissue progression defined as an increase >=20% in the sum of the
diameter (SOD) (short axis for nodal lesions and long axis for non-nodal
lesions) of all target lesions based on the smallest SOD since treatment
started or the appearance of one or a new lesion.
c. Progression of bone disease: defined as appearance of two or more new
lesions by bone scan.
5. Progression on previous treatment with one ARAT (abiraterone or enzalutamide
or darolutamide or apalutamide) in either the CSPC or CRPC setting.
6. PSMA-PET scan (i.e., 68Ga-PSMA-11 or 18F-DCFPyL) positive as determined by
the sponsor's central reader.
7. Castrate circulating testosterone levels (<1.7 nmol/L or <50 ng/dL).
8. Adequate organ function, independent of transfusion:
a. Bone marrow reserve:
i. White blood cell (WBC) count >=2.5 × 109/L OR absolute neutrophil count (ANC)
>=1.5 × 109/L.
ii. Platelets >=100 × 109/L.
iii. Hemoglobin >=8 g/dL.
b. Liver function:
i. Total bilirubin <=1.5 × institutional upper limit of normal (ULN). For
patients with known Gilbert*s syndrome, <=3 × ULN is permitted.
ii. ALT or AST <=3.0× ULN.
c. Renal function:
i. Serum/plasma creatinine <=1.5 × ULN or creatinine clearance >=50 mL/min based
on Cockcroft-Gault formula.
d. Albumin >=30 g/L.
9. Human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients who are healthy and have a
low risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related outcomes are included in
this trial.
10. For patients who have partners who are pregnant or of childbearing
potential a condom is required along with a highly effective contraceptive
method during the study and for 6 months after last study drug administration.
Such methods deemed highly effective include
a) combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception
associated with inhibition of ovulation
b) progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of
ovulation
c) intrauterine device (IUD), d) intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)
e) bilateral tubal occlusion
f) vasectomy
g) sexual abstinence.
11. Willing to initiate ARAT therapy (either enzalutamide or abiraterone),
pre-specified by investigator, if randomized to Treatment Arm B.
12. ECOG performance status 0 to 1.
13. Willing and able to comply with all study requirements and treatments
(including 177Lu-PNT2002) as well as the timing and nature of required
assessments.
14. Signed informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
1. If noted in pathology report, prostate cancer with known significant
(>10% present in cells) sarcomatoid or spindle cell or neuroendocrine
components. Any small cell component in the cancer should result in exclusion.
2. Prior treatment for prostate cancer <=28 days prior to randomization, with
the exclusion of first line local external beam, ARAT, luteinizing
hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist or antagonist therapy, or
non-radioactive bone-targeted agents.
3. Any prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for CRPC (e.g., cabazitaxel or docetaxel);
chemotherapy for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) is allowed if the
last dose was administered >1 year prior to consent.
4. Prior treatment with systemic radionuclides (e.g. radium-223, rhenium-186,
strontium-89).
5. Prior immuno-therapy, except for sipuleucel-T.
6. Prior PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy, e.g., Lu-177-PSMA-617, I 131-1095.
7. Prior poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor for prostate cancer.
8. Patients who progressed on 2 or more lines of ARATs.
9. Patients receiving bone-targeted therapy (e.g. denosumab, zoledronic acid)
are excluded if they are not on stable doses for at least 4 weeks prior to
randomization.
10. Administration of an investigational agent <=60 days or 5 half-lives,
whichever is shorter, prior to randomization.
11. Major surgery <=30 days prior to randomization.
12. Estimated life expectancy <6 months as assessed by the principal
investigator.
13. Presence of liver metastases >1 cm on abdominal imaging.
14. A superscan on bone scan defined as a bone scan that demonstrates markedly
increased skeletal radioisotope uptake relative to soft tissues in association
with absent or faint genitourinary tract activity71.
15. Dose escalation or initiation of opioids for cancer-related pain <=30 days
prior to consent up to and including randomization.
16. Known presence of central nervous system metastases.
17. Contraindications to the use of planned ARAT therapy.
18. Active malignancy other than low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
and non-melanoma skin cancer.
19. Concurrent illness that may jeopardize the patient*s ability to undergo
study procedures.
20. Serious psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition
that might hamper compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule.
Patients that travel need to be capable of repeated visits even if they are on
the control arm.
21. Symptomatic cord compression, or clinical or radiologic findings indicative
of impending cord compression.
22. Concurrent serious (as determined by the investigator) medical conditions,
including, but not limited to, New York Heart Association class III or IV
congestive heart failure, unstable ischemia, uncontrolled symptomatic
arrhythmia, history of congenital prolonged QT syndrome, uncontrolled
infection, known active hepatitis B or C, or other significant co-morbid
conditions that in the opinion of the investigator would impair study
participation or cooperation.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EU-CTR | CTIS2024-515604-39-00 |
EudraCT | EUCTR2021-002641-15-NL |
CCMO | NL78551.091.21 |