This study has been transitioned to CTIS with ID 2023-509287-26-00 check the CTIS register for the current data. To compare the progression free survival and neurotoxity of first line treatment with F-Nal-IRI, CapCar and CapOx.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Gastrointestinal neoplasms malignant and unspecified
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Progression free survival (PFS1) and neurotoxicity
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints
* Overall survival
* Response rate according to RECIST 1.1
* Adverse events according to NCI CTC version 5.0
* Quality of life
* Percentage of patients proceeding to subsequent lines of treatment after
progression and describe the types of treatment
* Reasons for forgoing subsequent treatment after progression
- To compare the primary objective and above mentioned secondary
objectives for patients treated with and without nivolumab
- To compare the progression free survival 2: time from reintroduction
carboplatin, oxaliplatin or Nal-IRI after first moment of disease progression,
untill disease progression.
Exploratory endpoints
• Relative abundance of stroma and tumor immune infiltrate in metastatic tumor
tissue as predictor of response to treatment and survival.
• Stromal markers, including ADAM12 in metastatic tumor tissue and blood as
predictor of response to treatment and survival.
• Patient derived tumor organoids to assess markers of response to treatment
and identify resistance pathways.
• Baseline ctDNA levels and changes in ctDNA as a marker of response to
treatment.
• Baseline characteristics of and changes in the fecal microbiome as a
biomarker for response to treatment and toxicity.
• Cost effectiveness.
Background summary
No globally accepted standard first-line treatment regimen exists.
In deciding on an optimal first-line treatment regimen, not only (progression
free) survival should be taken into account, but also the effects of a
first-line regimen on the possibility to undergo subsequent treatments. In this
respect, side effects are of crucial importance: if a side-effect does not
readily resolve after stopping the treatment this may hamper the start of
second-line treatment. This issue particularly arises with neurotoxicity, a
well-known side effect of the F-oxaliplatin combination. F-oxaliplatin is a
frequently used doublet in many countries, and, in fact, in the Netherlands
even the most frequently used doublet. [publication in preparation]
Neurotoxicity may last for prolonged periods of time, and may prevent the start
of second line paclitaxel. Replacing oxaliplatin by another platinum compound
such as carboplatin, or a non-neurotoxic compound such as liposomal irinotecan,
may resolve this issue.
Therefore, in this study we will set out to compare three F-doublets, both in
terms of efficacy and toxicity, more particularly neurotoxicity, to identify
the most optimal first-line cytotoxic treatment regimen for future use.
As of spring 2022 nivolumab will be added to the treatment of patients with a
PD-L1 CPS of 5 or higher, but this isonly applicable for patients treated with
CapOX or CapCar. For this reason, patients with a CPS of 5 or higher will no
longer be randomized to F-Nal-IRI from that moment on, but only to CapOx and
CapCar and they will also receive nivolumab in addition to chemotherapy.
Study objective
This study has been transitioned to CTIS with ID 2023-509287-26-00 check the CTIS register for the current data.
To compare the progression free survival and neurotoxity of first line
treatment with F-Nal-IRI, CapCar and CapOx.
Study design
multi-center, open label, randomized phase II trial using a pick the winner
design
Intervention
1. Nal-IRI 70 mg/m² (water free base), folinic acid 400 mg/m², fluorouracil
2400 mg/m² over 46 h, every 2 weeks.
2. Capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC5 with/without Nivolumab, every
three weeks.
3. Capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 with/without Nivolumab,
every three weeks.
Study burden and risks
Burden
Extra VENA PUNCTION: baseline, week 4 and at progression: 55 ml blood
(translational research)
Extra QUESTIONNAIRE: every 3 weeks, neurotoxicity 5-10 min
Extra QUESTIONNAIRE: every 9 weeks 20-30 min
Extra FECES collection and diet diary during 3 days: baseline, week 4, week 10
OPTIONAL: baseline: biopsies primary gastroesophagel tumor and /or
metastases (liver maximal 2-3 extra biopsies, skin 3-4 biopsies)
In regular treatment, a biopsy will performed to diagnose metastatic
cancer. Also every 3 weeks, a physical examination and a venapunction will
take place to assure that the next cycle can be administered.
The blood and tumor tissue for biomarkers, feces collection and questionnaires
are extra.
Meibergdreef 9 9
Amsterdam 1105 AZ
NL
Meibergdreef 9 9
Amsterdam 1105 AZ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic or
irresectable HER2 negative adenocarcinoma of the stomach or oesophagus,
patients with HER2 positive disease are eligible when treatment with
trastuzumab is contraindicated.
* Patients with metastatic or irresectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach or
oesophagus not pre-treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy for irresectable
or metastatic disease. Palliative radiotherapy on the primary tumor or a
metastatic lesion is allowed if other untreated lesions for RECIST evaluation
are present. Chemoradiation with carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 2 and
paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 for irresectable disease is allowed if subsequent disease
progression is proven on radiological imaging.
* Measurable/evaluable disease as assessed by RECIST 1.1
* ECOG (WHO) performance status 0-2
* Adequate hepatic, renal and hematological function
Exclusion criteria
* Serum total bilirubin >=1.5 x ULN (biliary drainage is allowed for biliary
obstruction) * Severe renal impairment (CLcr <= 30 ml/min) * Any clinically
significant gastrointestinal disorder, including hepatic disorders, bleeding,
inflammation, occlusion, or diarrhea > grade 2 * Severe arterial thromboembolic
events (myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, stroke) in last 6
months * NYHA Class III or IV congestive heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias
or uncontrolled blood pressure. Or known abnormal ECG with clinically
significant abnormal findings * Current use or any use in last two weeks of
strong CYP3A-enzyme, CYP2C8, and/or strong UGT1A inhibitors/inducers * Known
complete dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency * Treatment within 4
weeks with DPD inhibitors, including sorivudine or its chemically related
analogues such as brivudine * Pre-existing motor or sensory neurotoxicity
greater than CTCAE grade 1
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Kamer G4-214
Postbus 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
020 566 7389
mecamc@amsterdamumc.nl
Kamer G4-214
Postbus 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
020 566 7389
mecamc@amsterdamumc.nl
Kamer G4-214
Postbus 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
020 566 7389
mecamc@amsterdamumc.nl
Kamer G4-214
Postbus 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
020 566 7389
mecamc@amsterdamumc.nl
Kamer G4-214
Postbus 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
020 566 7389
mecamc@amsterdamumc.nl
Kamer G4-214
Postbus 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
020 566 7389
mecamc@amsterdamumc.nl
Kamer G4-214
Postbus 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
020 566 7389
mecamc@amsterdamumc.nl
Kamer G4-214
Postbus 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
020 566 7389
mecamc@amsterdamumc.nl
Kamer G4-214
Postbus 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
020 566 7389
mecamc@amsterdamumc.nl
Kamer G4-214
Postbus 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
020 566 7389
mecamc@amsterdamumc.nl
Kamer G4-214
Postbus 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
020 566 7389
mecamc@amsterdamumc.nl
Kamer G4-214
Postbus 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
020 566 7389
mecamc@amsterdamumc.nl
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EU-CTR | CTIS2023-509287-26-00 |
EudraCT | EUCTR2018-002767-26-NL |
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT03764553 |
CCMO | NL66783.018.18 |