Primary objective:To evaluate whether the addition of lenalidomide to rituximab-maintenance improves progression free survival (PFS) compared to standard rituximab maintenance after response to induction chemotherapy in older patients with mantle…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Lymphomas non-Hodgkin's unspecified histology
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Progression free survival (PFS) from randomization for maintenance to
progression or death from any cause
Secondary outcome
• Time to event :
- overall survival from induction randomization to death from any cause
- overall survival from maintenance randomization to death from any cause
- time to treatment failure, progression-free survival from induction
randomization, remission duration
• PR/CRu to CR and PR to CRu conversion during maintenance
• Minimal residual disease (MRD) status and levels in peripheral blood and bone
marrow at midterm and at the end of induction, after one and two
years from end of induction and during follow-up until progression or up to 2.5
years of follow-up whichever comes first
• complete and overall response rates (based on Cheson 1999 criteria) at
midterm and end of induction,
• safety according to NCI CTCAE (v 4.0)
• secondary primary malignancies rates after lenalidomide vs. no lenalidomide
• Exploratory : response assessment according to Cheson 2007 criteria including
FDG-PET evaluation
Background summary
Based on several randomized trials and a systematic Cochrane review, combined
immuno-chemotherapy represents the current standard of care in MCL (ESMO
guidelines). However, even after immuno-chemotherapy only, a constant relapse
pattern has been observed with the majority of patients relapsing within the
first 3 years. Based on preliminary results from the recently closed phase III
MCL elderly trial performed within the European MCL Network, Rituximab
maintenance after 8 cycles of R-CHOP induction prolongs remission duration and
overall survival and therefore represents the current standard of care for
elderly patients with MCL. Still, no plateau has been observed, suggesting that
maintenance with rituximab is not sufficient, but can be considered as a
standard of care in MCL patients unable to received high-dose therapy with SCT
consolidation.
Improving patient*s outcome can be reached by improving response rate before
maintenance therapy. In younger patients, recent data from the MCL younger
trial proved the superiority of alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAP (with high dose
Ara-C) when compared to R-CHOP alone. These data suggest that incorporating
cytarabine to induction therapy may improve patients* outcome in elderly
patients with MCL.
An international phase II study suggested a longlasting impact of lenalidomide
in relapsed MCL. These data suggest that incorporating lenalidomide to
maintenance therapy with Rituximab could also improve MCL patients* outcome in
patients unfit to receive HDT consolidation therapy.
Study objective
Primary objective:
To evaluate whether the addition of lenalidomide to rituximab-maintenance
improves progression free survival (PFS) compared to standard rituximab
maintenance after response to induction chemotherapy in older patients with
mantle cell lymphoma not suitable for autologous stem cell transplantation
Secondary objective:
- to compare efficacy and safety of the maintenance regimens in terms of
secondary endpoints
- to evaluate whether the introduction of cytarabine into induction improves
clinical outcome compared to standard R-CHOP in older patients with mantle cell
lymphoma not suitable for autologous stem cell transplantation
Study design
phase III randomized trial, international, multicentric, open labeled for
induction and maintenance treatment
Intervention
addition of lenalidomide to maintenance treatment.
Study burden and risks
All study treatments have proven their efficacy in the treatment of MCL. It is
expected that patients will achieve a high response rate in each of the
induction arms consisting of 8 courses of R-CHOP or alternating 3 courses of
R-CHOP and 3 courses of R-HAD. It is hoped that induction with alternating 3
courses of RCHOP and 3 courses of RHAD will improve the outcome. For the
maintenance therapy, in patients who initially reach at least a partial
response to induction, it is hoped that adding lenalidomide to standard
Rituximab maintenance will be beneficial to the patients in term of PFS. It is
possible that some patients may not reach a clinical response with the study
treatment and will require other treatment outside this protocol.
Altogether, in this elderly MCL patient*s population, the benefit of this
treatment program is expected to be superior to the potential short and long
term toxicities. This study will help gain knowledge about this innovative
treatment strategy in MCL based on new induction and maintenance strategies.
Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud Bâtiment 2D
Lyon-Sud 69495
FR
Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud Bâtiment 2D
Lyon-Sud 69495
FR
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Randomization 1:
1. signed informed consent form
2. Biopsy-proven mantle cell lymphoma according to WHO classification,
including evidence of cyclin D1 overexpression or the translocation
t(11;14)(q13;q32),
3. >= 60 years of age and ineligible for autologous transplant
4. Ann Arbor stage II-IV
5. previously untreated (except for patients randomized directly for
maintenance treatment who will receive 8 RCHOP before registration in the trial)
6. ECOG performance status <= 2
7. Male subjects must:
- agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a woman of childbearing
potential, even if they have had a vasectomy, throughout lenalidomide therapy
- agree to not donate semen during lenalidomide therapy.
8. All subjects must:
- have an understanding that the lenalidomide could have a potential
teratogenic risk.
- agree to abstain from donating blood while taking lenalidomide therapy
- agree not to share study medication with another person.
- be counseled about pregnancy precautions and risks of foetal exposure.,
Randomization 2:
To be randomized for maintenance, the patient must satisfy all inclusion /
exclusion criteria for randomization 1 and the following criteria:
9. CR, CRu or PR after induction treatment, determined as per Cheson 1999
criteria by investigator
10. During the run-in period of 6 months starting from the date of the first
randomization, in the case of direct randomization into maintenance phase,
patient must have been treated in first line by 6-8 cycles of R-CHOP.
Exclusion criteria
Randomization 1:
1. Female of child-bearing potential (without natural menopause for at least 24
consecutive months, a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy)
2. Any of the following laboratory abnormalities, if not related to lymphoma:
- Absolute neutrophils count (ANC) <1,000 /mm^3 (1.0 x 10^9/L) if not result
of a BM infiltration.
- Platelet counts < 75,000/mm^3 (75 x 10^9/L) if not result of a BM
infiltration.
- Serum aspartate transaminase (AST/SGOT) or alanine transaminase(ALT/SGPT)
>3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN).
- Serum total bilirubin > 1.5 UNL (except if due to Gilbert*s syndrome)
3. Calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula or MDRD) < 30 mL /
min
4. Central nervous system involvement by lymphoma
5. Contraindication for medicamentous DVT prophylaxis for patients at high risk
for DVT
6. Prior history of malignancies other than MCL unless the subject has been
free of the disease for >= 5 years (Exceptions: Basal or squamous cell carcinoma
of the skin, Carcinoma in situ of the cervix or of the breast, Incidental
histologic finding of prostate cancer (TNM stage of T1a or T1b).
7. Any serious medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric
illness that would prevent the patient to receive the study medication as
planned.
8. Poor cardiac function (LVEF <50%) on echocardiography
9. Seropositivity for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, mandatory test)
Seropositivity for hepatitis C virus (HCV, mandatory test), Active viral
infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV, mandatory test):
- HBsAg positive
- HBsAg negative, anti-HBs positive and anti-HBc positive
Patients with prior Hepatitis B must be given antiviral prophylaxis and HBV DNA
monitored. Note: Patients who are HBsAg negative, anti-HBs positive and/or
anti-HBc positive but viral DNA negative are eligible.
10. Uncontrolled illness including, but not limited to:
- Active infection requiring parenteral antibiotics
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- Chronic symptomatic congestive heart failure (Class NYHA III or IV).
- Unstable angina pectoris, angioplasty, stenting, or myocardial infarction
within 6 months
- Clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia that is symptomatic or requires
treatment, or asymptomatic sustained ventricular tachycardia.
11. Prior >= Grade 3 allergic hypersensitivity to thalidomide.
12. Prior >= Grade 3 rash or any desquamating (blistering) rash while taking
thalidomide.
13. Subjects with >= Grade 2 neuropathy.
14. Known anti-murine antibody (HAMA) reactivity or known hypersensitivity to
murine antibodies
15. Prior use of lenalidomide.
16. Participation in another clinical trial within three weeks before
randomization in this study., Randomization 2:
The presence of any exclusion criteria of randomization 1 or of the following
criteria will exclude a subject from enrollment in the maintenance phase:
17. SD or PD after induction treatment determined as per Cheson 1999 criteria
assessed by investigator.
18. Patients who had not received at least 6 cycles of R-CHOP21 or 2 cycles of
R-CHOP21 / 2 cycles of R-HAD28 (alternating)
19. Patients with serious underlying medical conditions, which could impair the
ability to receive maintenance treatment
20. Calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula or MDRD) of < 30
mL /min at screening for maintenance.
21. ANC < 1,000 cells/mm³ (1.0 X 10^9/L) at screening for maintenance;
22. Platelet count < 50,000 cells/mm³ (50 X 10^9/L) at screening for
maintenance.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2012-002542-20-NL |
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT01865110 |
CCMO | NL43749.078.14 |