To evaluate the safety of a new scaffold platform in native coronary arteries that includes incorporation of a deformable expansion technology and an enhanced scaffold material that is a polycarbonate co-polymer of tyrosine analogs. This will be…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Coronary artery disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) and Late Lumen Loss at 6 months.
Secondary outcome
All Cohort A Patients
- QCA derived parameters at 6 -0/+ 1 month (e.g. Late Loss, Restenosis Rate,
%DS & MLD)
- IVUS & OCT imaging on a subset of patients at 6 -0/+ 1 month
Up to 25 Cohort A Patients
- QCA derived parameters at 24 -0/+ 1 month (e.g. Late Loss, Restenosis Rate,
%DS & MLD)
- IVUS & OCT imaging on a subset of patients at 24 -0/+ 1 month
- Dual Source CT Scan
All Cohort B Patients
- QCA derived parameters at 9 -0/+ 1 month (e.g. Late Loss, Restenosis Rate,
%DS & MLD)
- IVUS & OCT imaging on a subset of patients at 9 -0/+ 1 month
Up to 25 Cohort B Patients
- QCA derived parameters at 48 -0/+ 1 month (e.g. Late Loss, Restenosis Rate,
%DS & MLD)
- IVUS & OCT imaging on a subset of patients at 48 -0/+ 1 month
- Dual Source CT Scan
All Patients
- MACE through 60 months
- TLR, TVR and TVF through 60 months post procedure
- Procedural success * percentage of patients with angiographic success (final
diameter stenosis <50% without occurrence of MACE)
- Technical success * successful delivery and deployment of a Fantom scaffold
Background summary
Coronary arteries, which supply blood to the heart muscle, are particularly
susceptible to the buildup of plaque, which can block or inhibit blood flow.
The process of arterial narrowing is referred to as atherosclerosis, or
coronary artery disease. If the coronary arteries become too narrow, cardiac
tissue may become starved of nutrients and oxygen, especially during exercise
when myocardial oxygen consumption increases, and pain (angina) may occur. As
vessel narrowing becomes more severe, death of myocardial muscle cells
downstream from the occlusion can occur due to the lack of oxygen. The sudden
death of these myocardial cells can result in a life threatening heart attack
(myocardial infarction).
Coronary artery disease accounts for the greatest mortality among all forms of
heart disease. Given the staggering morbidity and mortality associated with
coronary artery disease, any effort to return these patients to a productive,
pain-free existence is undeniably worthwhile and valuable to the individual and
society.
Coronary balloon angioplasty is a minimally invasive method of opening blocked
arteries. The procedure is more formally known as *PTCA* (percutaneous
transluminal coronary angioplasty). While angioplasty is successful in
restoring blood flow initially, restenosis or renarrowing of the treated vessel
occurs within six months in about 40% of cases.
To address this problem a device called a coronary stent was developed to
improve the clinical outcome after PTCA. The introduction of stents in the
early 1990s was a major breakthrough in the treatment of restenosis. A stent is
a flexible metal wire mesh tube, typically made from stainless steel alloys.
Coronary stents are typically mounted on a balloon and expanded during
implantation to the desired diameter. It was found that the implantation of a
stent reduces the incidence of restenosis to roughly 20% to 30%.
Currently stents are used in approximately 90% of all interventional procedures
worldwide.
The next major development in this endeavor came in the form of a combination
drug-device known as a Drug-Eluting Stent (DES). These metal stents commonly
combine a thin polymer coating and therapeutic drug that inhibits the build-up
of tissue during wound healing after stent delivery.
The most recent DES clinical trials demonstrated a restenosis rate of less than
10%.
In spite of these significant advancements, the use of metal-based drug-eluting
stents that remain permanently embedded within the arterial wall still has a
number of potential drawbacks. These drawbacks include:
* predisposition to late-stage stent thrombosis
* prevention of late vessel adaptive or expansive remodeling
* prevention of normal vasomotion and compliance
* hindrance to and sometimes a barrier for surgical revascularization
* Impairment of imaging with multi-slice CT
Additionally, as general coronary intervention procedures move towards treating
more diffuse disease, more stents are used in a single vessel. The use of
multiple stents within a single vessel often results in a vessel that has been
*paved* with stents. The paving of a vessel results in a situation by where it
is often difficult to perform future surgical bypass when prescribed; in some
cases, it is prohibited.
In an effort to continually improve outcomes in interventional cardiology
patient care, researchers are pursuing novel approaches to solve the drawbacks
described above while preserving the advances offered by current metallic
stents and DES. One such effort involves stenting coronary vessels with fully
bioresorbable scaffolds that act as *temporary* stents to support the vessel
during the initial critical months of healing and remodelling after dilation.
Such an approach can provide the benefits of metal stents * prevention of acute
vessel recoil and abrupt closure, and avoid the late negative consequences of
pathological remodelling of the vessel that may lead to late restenosis since
the bioresorbable stent is not permanent. In addition, if the bioresorbable
scaffold were drug-eluting, it could offer the additional benefit of a
traditional metallic DES by inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia.
Early efforts demonstrated:
* The use of polymer resorbable scaffolds is feasible * resorbable polymer
scaffolds have been successfully deployed in human patients.
* In most cases, deployment of the scaffold was accomplished using a
non-commercially viable, heated balloon catheter to expand the polymer scaffold
without stressing the bioresorbable material
* The use of *off-the-shelf* polymers may not be sufficient to address the
design requirements of a coronary scaffold. Optimization of polymer-based
coronary scaffolds may require a scaffold design and polymer materials
specifically engineered for vascular scaffold applications.
* Novel solutions are required to address the lack of visibility by X-ray with
these early materials, which is a standard clinical requirement for accurate
scaffold placement.
From the beginning, REVA Medical took a unique approach to fully integrate both
a novel material and a novel design in developing a REVA Sirolimus-Eluting
Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold that provides the benefits of metal without the
permanency. The desired performance benefits include adequate strength, both at
the time of implantation and during the critical initial three month period of
vessel remodelling, scaffold expansion over the traditional (and expected)
expansion range of metal stents and x-ray visibility of the device.
A major drawback of contemporary polymers is that they lack intrinsic
radiopacity. An important advancement in the development of this polymer has
been the enhancement of x-ray visibility. Incorporation of iodine into the
polymer backbone allows the scaffold to be visualized using the angiographic
techniques that are currently used by physicians today.
The REVA Scaffold has been developed with two unique expansion designs. The
first design included a Slide and Lock expansion mechanism. Unlike traditional
deformable metal stent designs, the Slide & Lock design deploys by sliding open
and locking the scaffold into place. This novel scaffold design eliminates the
need to significantly deform the device during deployment. More recently, the
REVA scaffold has also been designed with a traditional deformable
configuration for expansion.
The purpose of the FANTOM II study is to evaluate a scaffold with a traditional
method of stent expansion of the REVA FANTOM Scaffold in a similar clinical
setting.
Study objective
To evaluate the safety of a new scaffold platform in native coronary arteries
that includes incorporation of a deformable expansion technology and an
enhanced scaffold material that is a polycarbonate co-polymer of tyrosine
analogs. This will be accomplished through the implantation and evaluation of
the REVA FANTOM Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary scaffold comprised of
Poly(I2DAT -co-lactic acid)
Study design
Prospective, multi-center, safety & performance study
Intervention
Implantation of the REVA Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold.
Study burden and risks
Risks: possible side effects of the study procedure (see also question E9).
Burden: the scheduled visits at the study doctor (see also questions E3 and
E3a).
Copley Drive 5751
San Diego, CA 92111
US
Copley Drive 5751
San Diego, CA 92111
US
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
* The patient is * 18 years of age
* The subject must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g. stable, unstable
angina, post-infarct angina or silent ischemia) suitable for elective PCI.
Subjects with stable angina or silent ischemia and < 70% diameter stenosis must
have objective signs of ischemia as determined by one of the following:
echocardiogram, nuclear scans, ambulatory ECG or stress ECG. In the absence of
noninvasive ischemia, FFR must be done and must be indicative of ischemia
* The patient is an acceptable candidate for PTCA, stenting and emergent CABG
* The patient is willing and able to comply with the specified follow-up
evaluations
* The patient*s written informed consent has been obtained prior to the
procedure
* Each lesion must meet all the following baseline criteria (prior to
pre-dilation):
- De novo lesion in a native coronary artery
- Visually estimated stenosis of * 50% and <100%
- Visually estimated RVD * 2.5 mm and * 3.5 mm
- Lesion length * 20 mm by visual estimate
- Baseline TIMI flow * 2 per visual estimate
* During pre-dilatation the pre-dilatation balloon is uniformly expanded to the
full intended diameter
* Immediately after the pre-dilatation process the patient does not experience
chest pain or ECG changes lasting longer than 10 minutes
* Each lesion must meet all the following criteria after pre-dilatation:
- Visually estimated stenosis of * 40%
- Target vessel reference diameter * 2.5 mm and * 3.5 mm by QCA, IVUS or OCT
- Lesion length * 20 mm by visual estimate
- Post pre-dilatation TIMI flow * 3 per visual estimate
- No dissections * type C
Exclusion criteria
* The patient has a known allergy, intolerance, or is contraindicated to
aspirin, both heparin and bivalirudin, clopidogrel and/or contrast media, and
cannot be adequately pre-medicated
* The patient has experienced an acute myocardial infarction (AMI: STEMI or
NSTEMI) within 72 hours of the procedure and either CK-MB or Troponin has not
returned to within 2X ULN. Note: In the event that CK-MB is not measured prior
to treatment, the patient will be considered to have met this enrollment
criteria provided that the Troponin assessment is within 2X ULN and a blood
sample is drawn prior to the procedure; the CK-MB analysis must then be
performed post-procedure
* The patient is currently experiencing clinical symptoms consistent with AMI
* The patient has a left ventricular ejection fraction of <40%
* The patient requires or has had an additional intervention of a coronary
lesion in the target vessel within 1 year of the index procedure
* The patient requires additional intervention of another coronary lesion in
the target epicardial vessel (LAD, LCX or RCA) or branch of the target
epicardial vessel during the index procedure
Note: Staged procedures to treat lesions in non-target epicardial vessels are
allowed during the index procedure or > 30 days after REVA scaffold
implantation. If a non-target lesion requires treatment during the index
procedure, the non-target lesion should be treated first
* The patient has unprotected left main coronary disease with * 50% stenosis
* The patient has a significant (* 50%) untreated stenosis proximal or distal
to the target lesion
* The patient has a scaffold(s) or stent located within 3 mm of the target
lesion borders
* The target vessel is totally occluded (TIMI Flow 0 to 1)
* Excessive proximal tortuosity, vessel hinging at the lesion location or
lesion angulation, such that in the operator*s judgment it is unlikely that the
REVA Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold or a standard scaffold could be delivered
and/or expanded
* The patient is currently participating in another investigational drug or
device trial that has not completed the entire follow-up period
* The patient has a co-morbidity, which reduces life expectancy to * 24 months,
or factors making clinical follow-up difficult
* The patient has:
- Known hepatic impairment (Liver function tests (SGOT, SGPT, and ALT) >3 times
normal)
- Known impaired renal function (serum creatinine * 2.5 mg/dL)
- A platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 (thrombocytopenia); and/or >700,000
cells/mm3
* The patient has a history of stroke (CVA) or TIA within the prior 6 months
* The patient has an active peptic ulcer or upper GI bleeding within the prior
6 months
* The patient has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will
refuse blood transfusions
* The patient is a woman that is pregnant or lactating
* Target lesion ostial (within 3mm of vessel origin)
* Target lesion has moderate to severe calcification
* Target segment has side branches or a bifurcation > 1.5 mm in diameter
* Target lesion is located within an arterial bypass graft conduit or saphenous
vein graft
* Target lesion is located within a previously stented region
* Target lesion is located within a segment supplied by distal graft
* Target lesion has possible or definite thrombus
* The patient is currently receiving or will require chronic anticoagulation
therapy (e.g. coumadin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban or any other agent
for any reason)
* The patient is known to need or has a planned surgical procedure or any other
reason is present which might require discontinuing aspirin and/or clopidogrel
within 1 year of the FANTOM scaffold implantation
* Patient has a known allergy to tyrosine derived polycarbonate or Sirolimus
and its structurally related compounds
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT02539966 |
CCMO | NL51852.018.15 |