This study aims to evaluate the impact of UAE on Quality of life (QOL) in comparison to hysterectomy in adenomyosis patients. A cost-effectiveness study will be part of the trial as well as a cohort hysterectomy group to clearify imaging and…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Reproductive neoplasms female benign
- Vascular therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary endpoint: quality of life as measured by a combination of the World
Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-Bref) and short-form-12
(SF-12) questionnaire at 26 weeks after therapy.
Secondary outcome
The two treatments will also be compared in terms of Clinical outcomes,
Recovery related outcomes, Quality of life outcomes and cost outcomes. Also
imaging outcomes will be investigated at baseline in order to identify
potential predictive parameters for therapy effect.
Background summary
Adenomyosis is defined as the benign invasion of endometrial stroma and glands
in the myometrium, surrounded by hypertrophic and hyperplastic myometrium.
Today adenomyosis still poses a gynaecological challenge. There are differences
in opinion and thus differences in definition, diagnosing as well a treatment
options.
Adenomyosis is frequently suspected in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding
and dysmenorrhea and diagnosed in the uterine specimen of patients with
presumed uterine fibroids. Due to improved quality of imaging techniques the
accuracy to detect adenomyosis compared to histology has increased.
Hysterectomy is established as the final treatment option when conservative
treatment fails. Case series for UAE (uterine artery embolization) in
adenomyosis patients show promising results, however . A randomized controlled
trial is lacking.
Study objective
This study aims to evaluate the impact of UAE on Quality of life (QOL) in
comparison to hysterectomy in adenomyosis patients. A cost-effectiveness study
will be part of the trial as well as a cohort hysterectomy group to clearify
imaging and diagnosis of adenomyosis.
Study design
Case-control study
Protocol change
The original protocol described a randomized controlled trial where eligible
patients (not changed) were randomized to either hysterectomy or UAE in a 1:2
ratio. Inclusion rates were disappointing, resulting in very low progress of
the trial. Therefore a new design was chosen: a case-control design with
retrospective matching (or correction of baseline variables if not identical at
baseline. Although randomized data are strongest, a case control study still
renders the best evidence in this field, since no comparative study has been
performed so far. This protocol has been changed (with track changes) to the
new design.
Intervention
UAE, performed by experienced interventional radiologists versus hysterectomy
(laparoscopically, abdominally or vaginally).
Study burden and risks
Both UAE and hysterectomy are performed for symptomatic adenomyosis. There is
ample experience with UAE, both for symptomatic uterine fibroids and
post-partum haemorrhage. Also, adenomyosis embolization has been performed in
numerous case series. A comparative study with hysterectomy has never been made
with any other treatment. Therefore, this study is about efficacy and not about
safety. There are no specific risks as women who are willing to conceive are
excluded. The specific risks that apply to the treatment are described above
(E9).
De Boelelaan 1117
Amsterdam 1081HV
NL
De Boelelaan 1117
Amsterdam 1081HV
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
• Premenopausal women with symptomatic adenomyosis or dominant adenomyosis
in combination with fibroids.
• Woman who are (due to complaints and non responsive former
treatment strategies) eligible for hysterectomy
• No wish to conceive
• Able to understand Dutch or English language.
Exclusion criteria
• Younger than 18 years of age
• Pelvic infection/Suspicion or presence of malignancy
• Current pregnancy
• Contra-indication for angiography (such as contrast fluid allergy,
coagulopathy and renal failure), when not treatable
• Deep infiltrating endometriosis requiring surgery or with risks on
intestinal stenosis
• Concurrent removable submucous fibroids (Patients eligible after removal)
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL52652.029.15 |