To increase the one year anastomotic integrity rate in patients undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer by the routine and quality controlled implementation of a multi-interventional program, which includes:1. MBP with oral…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Gastrointestinal neoplasms malignant and unspecified
- Gastrointestinal therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint of the IMARI-trial is anastomotic integrity at one year
postoperative.
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints
The most important secondary aim is to determine the impact on the incidence of
AL within 30 and 90 days and one year post-operation.
Other secondary aims include:
1. Quality of life and functional outcomes pre-op, 90 days post-op and one year
after operation.
2. Protocol compliance to any intervention
3. Compliance in association to AL
4. Changes in rectal microbiome and correlation to AL
5. Change in management due to FA using ICG
i. Site of proximal bowel division used for anastomosis
ii. Redo anastomosis or reinforcement of anastomosis after construction
anastomosis
iii. Decision for diverting stoma
iv. Decision for Hartmann or abdominoperineal resection rather than restorative
procedure
6. Diagnostic accuracy of CRP for AL
7. Efficacy of EVAC with early transanal closure of the anastomotic defect
8. Permanent stoma rate
9. Temporary stoma rate and stoma duration
10. Operative and post-operative complications within 30 days of operation
(using the Clavien-
Dindo classification of surgical complications)
11. Death
12. Hospital stay
13. Reintervention rate
14. Overall and stoma-related readmission
15. Local recurrence at one year post-operation
16. Cost analysis of AL and EVAC therapy
Background summary
Problem:
Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most feared complications after rectal
cancer surgery. AL leads to a significant increase of postoperative morbidity,
long-term surgical complications, negative impact on quality of life, higher
permanent stoma rates and impaired oncological outcome.
Our research group recently published a cross-sectional study of outcomes after
rectal cancer surgery in the Netherlands with a long-term incidence of AL of
20%. The current management of AL usually involves a deviating ileostomy, if
not performed primarily, in combination with *passive* drainage of the abscess
cavity via transanal or transcutaneous route. The cross-sectional study showed
that almost half of the leaks do not heal and may require major salvage surgery.
Solution:
Numerous risk factors have been identified for AL. Modifiable surgical factors
include tension on the anastomosis and anastomotic perfusion. A more recently
described pathophysiological mechanism relates to the intestinal microbiome.
Given the multifactorial etiology, a multi-interventional program is required
for the prevention of AL. Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) with oral
antibiotics can lead to a reduction in AL by reduction of
the fecal bulk and bacterial load. Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) optimizes
a tension-free anastomosis, particularly for the most distal rectal cancers.
Intraoperative real-time fluorescence angiography (FA) using indocyanine green
(ICG) assesses perfusion, thereby enabling precise
delineation of bowel transection and final anastomotic vitality. Routine use of
this technology has been associated with reduced AL rates.
If AL occurs, early diagnosis and *active* treatment allows for optimal control
of pelvic sepsis, anastomotic healing and stoma reversal. No international
consensus exists on a diagnostic pathway for early detection of AL, even though
evidence is building for the use of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the early
postoperative period. Considering *active* treatment our research group
investigated the impact of endoscopic vacuum-assisted drainage (EVAC) of the
abscess cavity in combination with early transanal closure of the anastomotic
defect. In the IMARI-trial we want to address all the interventions mentioned
above within existing institutional enhanced recovery programs and
prehabilitation initiatives (i.e. correction of anemia, optimization of
nutritional status, cessation of smoking).
Study objective
To increase the one year anastomotic integrity rate in patients undergoing
total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer by the routine and quality
controlled implementation of a multi-interventional program, which includes:
1. MBP with oral antibiotics
2. Tailored full SFM
3. Intraoperative FA using ICG
4. Routine CRP-measurement at day three postoperatively, CT-scan with rectal
contrast on
indication
5. EVAC with early transanal closure of the anastomotic defect
Study design
This is a multicenter prospective clinical effectiveness trial, whereby current
local practice (control cohort) will be evaluated, and subsequently compared to
the results after implementation of the multiinterventional program
(intervention cohort). Hospitals that apply up to three interventions in the
routine care pathway comprise the control cohort. After finishing accrual of
the control cohort, the full multi-interventional program will be implemented
and checked for quality over a three month period in all participating
hospitals, followed by accrual in the intervention cohort. Anastomotic
integrity at one year will be determined by a CT-scan in all included patients.
In the setting of a classical randomized controlled trial, contamination is
likely to occur in the control arm. We consider this also as a downside of a
stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design. For this reason, a comparative
cohort design has been chosen.
Intervention
The quality controlled implementation of a multi-interventional program to
increase the one year anastomotic integrity rate in patients undergoing total
mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer, includes:
1. MBP with oral antibiotics
2. Tailored full SFM
3. Intraoperative FA using ICG
4. Routine CRP-measurement at day three postoperatively, CT-scan with rectal
contrast on
indication
5. EVAC with early transanal closure of the anastomotic defect
Of this program, fluorescence angiography using ICG is an intraoperative tool
and an investigational intervention.
Study burden and risks
Patients are asked to fill in questionnaires before surgery and 90 days and 1
year after the operation. Furthermore, patients are asked to submit faecal
material for microbiota-analysis before surgery, and 4 days post-operative.
Drain fluid will be collected on day 1 postoperative (when a postoperative
drain is placed during surgery) and each subsequent day until the drain is
removed. Drain fluid collection will only be performed in Amsterdam UMC
locations and OLVG. Blood samples will be taken peri-operatively and on day 3
after surgery. When patients develop AL, an additional swab will be taken from
the presacral cavity.
At one year a CT-scan will be performed to assess the primary endpoint
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1105AZ
NL
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1105AZ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Patients with primary rectal cancer and scheduled for a total mesorectal
excision with planned restoration of bowel continuity or for completion total
mesorectal excision after previous local excision or regrowth in a watch and
wait protocol.
Exclusion criteria
Patients not undergoing colorectal/-anal anastomosis;
Local recurrent rectal cancer, or redo surgery;
Locally advanced rectal cancer requiring extended or multi-visceral excision.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Kamer G4-214
Postbus 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
020 566 7389
mecamc@amsterdamumc.nl
Kamer G4-214
Postbus 22660
1100 DD Amsterdam
020 566 7389
mecamc@amsterdamumc.nl
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL67600.018.18 |
OMON | NL-OMON26456 |