To investigate if a personalized multimodal physical therapy program compared to ACDF surgical treatment is non-inferior over a 12-month period and cost-effective in patients with painful cervical radiculopathy who have an indication for…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Spinal cord and nerve root disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary outcome for non-inferiority is disability over a 12-month period.
Secondary outcome
Secondary outcomes are arm and neck pain intensity, self-perceived recovery,
fear of movement, treatment adherence, health-related quality of life,
patient-specific activities, patient-acceptable symptom state, return-to-work,
pressure, heat, cold tests (QST measurements), medication use, costs,
percentages cross-overs, (re)surgeries, and complications. Additionally,
transcriptomics of peripheral immune cells will be performed at baseline and 6
months follow up to compare gene expression profiles between patients who
recover and those who do not.
Background summary
A neck hernia is a highly painful condition that can lead to significant
limitations in functioning and work. Surgery is the standard treatment when
pain and loss of feeling or strength in the arm persist. However, such surgery
also carries risks of complications and comes with high costs. An intensive
physiotherapy program tailored to the signs and symptoms of each individual
patient appears to have comparable effects as surgery after a year. If this is
the case, it provides patients with a good alternative treatment option and may
help prevent surgeries. We expect that personalized physiotherapy is equally
effective and more cost-effective than surgery. This is beneficial for patients
and society, as patients deserve safe and effective care. Multiple hospitals
are participating in the study. Patients are randomly assigned to either
surgery or physiotherapy treatment, and the effects are measured at 3, 6, 12,
24 and 60 months.
Study objective
To investigate if a personalized multimodal physical therapy program compared
to ACDF surgical treatment is non-inferior over a 12-month period and
cost-effective in patients with painful cervical radiculopathy who have an
indication for surgery
Hypothesis: A personalized multimodal physical therapy program is less
expensive and non-inferior in effectiveness compared to surgery.
Study design
A multicenter (11 clinics), randomized non-inferiority trial, with economic and
process evaluation.
Intervention
Intervention: A personalized multimodal physical therapy program consisting of
neuromobilizations, cervical mobilizations, exercise, pain education,
behavioral therapy depending on the clinical findings. The number of sessions
is 12 to 18 over a period of ~12 weeks. Only physical therapists who hold a
master's degree and have completed the training are allowed to participate in
the study. They are required to execute the intervention properly and consult
the researchers in case of any issues. Additionally, the researchers maintain
regular communication to monitor progress and assist in resolving any problems
encountered by the physical therapist.
Control (Usual care): Surgery (Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Fusion) with
usual post-operative care.
Study burden and risks
In order to reduce the burden of physical examination, blood withdrawal and
questionnaire completion, we have carefully selected physical tests and
questions, limiting their number as much as possible while still allowing for
effective research (Table 1). Venous blood samples will be taken to asses
immune parameters. The maximum amount of venous blood taken during the study is
14 ml (7 ml each).
The questionnaires will be administered at baseline and at 3-6-12-24-60 month
follow-up. The physical tests will only be conducted at baseline and at 12
month follow-up (except for the QST Measurements) (Tabel 1, C1 protocol), and
blood samples will be collected at baseline and 6 months follow-up.
The patients assigned to the personalized multimodal physical therapy will be
treated by a specialized physical therapist near their residential area. The
researchers will train and invite participating physical therapists to join the
study. Patients assigned to the personalized multimodal physical therapy will
receive 12-18 sessions of half an hour each. Patients assigned to the surgery
will receive usual care.
Participation in this study may be of benefit to patients as both interventions
reduce pain intensity and improve quality of life. Recent studies show that
multimodal physical therapy treatments are effective in reducing pain
intensity, neck mobility, daily functioning and quality of life. Additionally,
a systematic review shows that manual therapy leads to clinical improvements in
neck pain and disability at the short term. Exercise therapy is also considered
an effective treatment strategy for cervical radiculopathy. Surgery is an
effective treatment for pain relief and improvement in daily functioning.
Although surgical treatment provides a faster pain reduction compared to
conservative care, the effectiveness at the long term is comparable. The
overall complication rate for ACDF ranges from 13.2% to 19.3%. These include in
descending order; dysphagia (1.7%-9.5%), postoperative hematoma (0.4%-5.6%
(surgery required in 2.4% of 5.6%), with epidural hematoma 0.9%), symptomatic
recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (0.9%-3.1%), cerebrospinal fluid leak
(0.5%-1.7%), wound infection (0.1-0.9%-1.6%), increased radiculopathy (1.3%),
Horner*s syndrome (0.06%-1.1%), respiratory insufficiency (1.1%), esophageal
perforation (0.3%-0.9%, with a mortality rate of 0.1%), and instrument failure
(0.1%-0.9%). No serious adverse effects are reported for multimodal physical
therapy rehabilitation. The addition of QST measurements (Pressure, heat and
cold tests) was discussed with our patient panel. They acknowledged that the
development of a prediction model provides valuable benefits for personalizing
care. It was also noted that incorporating QST does not exceed the time limits
of a comprehensive physiotherapeutic consultation for the patient.
Under the basic insurance, physical therapy treatment is reimbursed for CR with
motor deficits, starting from the 21st treatment, for a maximum of 3 months.
For this project, an Innovation Policy rule will be requested from the NZA
(Nederlandse Zorg Autoriteit), with a preferred health insurance company.
Van der Boechorsstraat 9
Amsterdam 1081BT
NL
Van der Boechorsstraat 9
Amsterdam 1081BT
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Patients with CR with an indication for surgery and no contra-indication for
conservative management are eligible to participate. CR is diagnosed when the
patient*s clinical presentation corresponds to relevant Magnetic Resonance
Imaging (MRI) findings. An e-consult between the patients and the neurosurgeon
will take place to verify the indication for surgery. Further inclusion
criteria: Age >=18, at least 8 weeks of unilateral arm pain and/or paraesthesia,
with arm pain intensity and/or paraesthesia intensity Numeric Pain Rating Scale
(NPRS) >=4/10, sensory deficits, motor deficits and/or reduced reflexes.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: myelopathy, motor deficits measured by Medical Research
Council (MRC) scale for muscle strength<=3, previous neck surgery, psychiatric
disorders, systemic disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis), malignancies or
pregnancy. In case of myelopathy or MRC strength<=3, surgery will immediately be
preferred instead of a conservative policy due to the risk of permanent
disability.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
Other | https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/S7HWA |
CCMO | NL84177.028.23 |