This study has been transitioned to CTIS with ID 2023-503442-30-00 check the CTIS register for the current data. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of teclistamab and talquetamab both in combination with daratumumab and…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Haematopoietic neoplasms (excl leukaemias and lymphomas)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome Measure:
1. Progression Free Survival (PFS) from randomization to the date of disease
progression or death (Up to 9 years). PFS is defined as the duration from the
date of randomization to either progressive disease or death, whichever comes
first. Disease progression will be determined according to the International
Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria.
2. Complete Response (CR) or Better. From randomization up to 9 years. CR or
better is defined as the percentage of participants achieving CR or stringent
complete response (sCR) prior to subsequent antimyeloma therapy in accordance
with the IMWG criteria during or after the study treatment.
Secondary outcome
1. Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better. Timeframe: From randomization
up to 9 years. VGPR or better is defined as the percentage of participants
achieving VGPR and CR (including stringent complete response [sCR]) prior to
subsequent antimyeloma therapy in accordance with the International Myeloma
Working Group (IMWG) criteria during or after the study treatment.
2. Sustained Minimal Residual disease (MRD)-negative Complete Response (CR).
From randomization up to 9 years. Sustained MRD-negative CR is defined as
participants with CR or better who sustain MRD-negative status, as determined
by next-generation sequencing (NGS) with sensitivity of 10^-5, for at least 12
months
without any examination showing MRD positive status or progressive disease in
between.
3. MRD-negative CR. Timeframe: From randomization up to 9 years. MRD-negative
CR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve MRD-negative
status, as determined by NGS with sensitivity of 10^-5, at any time after
randomization and prior to progressive disease or subsequent antimyeloma
therapy and who achieve CR or better.
4. Progression Free Survival on Next-line Therapy (PFS2). Timeframe: From
randomization up to 9 years. PFS2 is defined as the time interval between the
date of randomization and date of event, which is defined as progressive
disease as assessed by investigator that starts after the next line of
subsequent therapy, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
5. Overall Survival (OS). Timeframe: From randomization to the date of death
(up to 9 years). OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to
the date of death due to any cause.
6. Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity. Timeframe:
From randomization up to 9 years. An adverse event is any untoward medical
occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical
(investigational or non-investigational) product. An adverse event does not
necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Severity will be
graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria
for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0. Severity scale ranges from Grade 1:
mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: life-threatening, and Grade
5: death related to adverse event.
7. Number of Participants with Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters.
Timeframe: From randomization up to 9 years. Number of participants with
abnormalities in laboratory parameters (serum chemistry and hematology) will be
reported.
8. Number of Participants with Abnormalities in Vital Signs. Timeframe: From
randomization up to 9 years. Number of participants with abnormalities in vital
signs (temperature, pulse/heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure) will be
reported.
9. Number of Participants with Abnormalities in Physical Examination.
Timeframe: From randomization up to 9 years. Number of participants with
abnormalities in physical examination will be reported.
10.. Number of Participants with Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG).
Timeframe: From randomization up to 9 years. Number of participants with
abnormalities in ECG will be reported.
11. Serum Concentrations of Teclistamab and Talquetamab. Timeframe: From
randomization up to 9 years. Serum samples will be analyzed to determine
concentrations of teclistamab using validated, specific, and sensitive methods.
12. Number of Participants with Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Teclistamab and
Talquetamab: Timeframe: From randomization up to 9 years. Number of
participants with ADAs to teclistamab will be reported.
13. Change from Baseline in Symptoms, Functioning, and Health-related Quality
of Life (HRQoL) as Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment
of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30). Timeframe:
From baseline up to 9 years. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 Version 3 includes 30 items that
make up 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social),
1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (pain, fatigue, and
nausea/vomiting), and 5 single symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss,
constipation, and diarrhea) and a single impact item (financial difficulties).
The recall period is 7 days (*past week*), and responses are reported using a
verbal and numeric rating scales. The item and scale scores are transformed to
a 0 to 100 scale. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus,
a high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of
functioning and a high score for the global health status represents high
HRQoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of
symptomatology/problems.
14. Change from Baseline in Treatment-related Symptoms as Assessed by
Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for
Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Timeframe: Baseline through Cycle 6 (each cycle
of28 days) (up to 196 days). The National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) PRO-CTCAE
is an item library of common AEs experienced by people with cancer that are
appropriate for self-reporting of treatment tolerability. Each symptom selected
for inclusion can be rated by up to 3 attributes characterizing the
presence/frequency, severity, and/or interference of the AEs. It ranges from 0
to 4 with higher scores indicating higher frequency or greater severity/impact.
15. Change from Baseline in Symptoms, Functioning, and Overall HRQoL as
Assessed by EuroQol Five Dimension Questionnaire 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L). Timeframe:
From baseline up to 9 years. The EQ-5D-5L is a 5-item questionnaire that
assesses 5 domains including mobility, self-care, usual activities,
pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression plus a visual analog scale rating
*health today* with anchors ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to
100 (best imaginable health state).
16. Time to Sustained Worsening in Symptoms, Functioning, and HRQoL: Timeframe:
From randomization up to 9 years. Time to sustained worsening in symptoms,
functioning and HRQoL is defined as the interval from the date of randomization
to the start date of meaningful change.
Background summary
A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing Teclistamab and Talquetamab both in
Combination with Daratumumab SC and Lenalidomide (Tec-DR and Tal-DR) versus
Daratumumab SC, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DRd) in Participants with
Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who are Either Ineligible or not Intended for
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant as Initial Therapy.
Teclistamab and talquetamab are IgG4-PAA bispecific antibodies targeting the
CD3 receptor expressed on the surface of T cells. Teclistamab additionally
targets BCMA, which is expressed on the surface of multiple myeloma B cell
lineage cells, as well as late-stage B cells and plasma cells. Talquetamab
additionally targets GPRC5D, which is expressed on multiple myeloma cells. Both
bispecific antibodies draw T cells in close proximity to target expressing
cells, leading to activation of T cells and subsequent lysis of target cells.
Study objective
This study has been transitioned to CTIS with ID 2023-503442-30-00 check the CTIS register for the current data.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of teclistamab and
talquetamab both in combination with daratumumab and lenalidomide (Tec-DR and
Tal-DR) versus daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (DRd).
Study design
Teclistamab is a full-size, immunoglobin G4 proline, alanine, alanine
(IgG4-PAA) bispecific antibody that targets the cluster of differentiation 3
(CD3) receptor expressed on the surface of T cells and B cell maturation
antigen (BCMA). Talquetamab is a full-size, humanized IgG4-PAA bispecific
antibody designed to target the CD3 receptor complex on T cells and G
protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D), which is a
7-transmembrane receptor protein that is classified as a type C G
protein-coupled receptor. DRd is an approved regimen for the treatment of
participants with newly diagnosed, transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma. The
primary hypothesis is that Tec-DR and Tal-DR will significantly improve PFS or
the rate of CR or better compared with DRd in participants with newly diagnosed
multiple myeloma who are ineligible or not intended for ASCT as initial
therapy.. The study will be conducted in 3 phases: Screening, Treatment, and
Follow-up. Safety Assessment includes adverse events (AEs), laboratory test
results, vital sign measurements, physical examination findings, assessment of
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status grade, and immune
effector cell associated encephalopathy (ICE) score (Tec-DR and Tal-DR).
Intervention
Arm A: Teclistamab, Daratumumab SC, Lenalidomide (Tec-DR): Participants will
receive teclistamab as subcutaneous (SC) injection in combination with
daratumumab lenalidomide.
Arm B: Talquetamab, Daratumumab SC, Lenalidomide (Tal-DR): Participants will
receive talquetamab as subcutaneous (SC) injection in combination with
daratumumab lenalidomide.
Arm C: Daratumumab SC, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DRd): Participants will
receive daratumumab as SC injection with lenalidomide and dexamethasone.
Study burden and risks
Taking into account the measures taken to minimize risk to participants in this
study, the potential risks identified for combination therapy of Tec-DR or
Tal-DR are justified by the anticipated benefits. The addition of teclistamab
or talquetamab to daratumumab SC and
lenalidomide offers a unique mechanism of action of T-cell redirection that
could lead to synergistic antimyeloma effects. A short course of lower dose
steroids mitigates the risk for sARR and CRS while reducing the risk of
long-term steroid-induced toxicities.
There is potential risk for overlapping toxicities with the planned study
drugs, specifically the unknown effect of daratumumab SC on CRS (which is the
main toxicity of concern with teclistamab) and sARRs. The risk mitigation
measures planned for the Tec-DR arm include:
* Implementation of step-up doses of teclistamab to reduce risk or severity of
CRS
* Subsequent to the urgent safety measure and consistent with data (as of
December 2023) from more than 400 participants showing that administration of
an IMiD starting after step-up dosing of teclistamab or talquetamab results in
a CRS profile similar to monotherapy of the
bispecific antibody, dosing of lenalidomide will start in Cycle 2.
* Implementation of pretreatment medications to reduce risk or severity of
sARRs and CRS
* SC administration of daratumumab reduces the risk of high-grade sARRs
* Specification of recommended therapies, including antimicrobial prophylaxis
and immunoglobulin replacement to reduce risk of infection.
* Robust management strategies for potential toxicities (Section 6.5).
In addition, to further characterize the safety profile of Tec-DR and Tal-DR
and mitigate potential risk of this new combination to study participants,
safety data from all participants in the Safety Run-in Cohorts , as well as
other relevant data from the clinical development program will be
evaluated by the sponsor*s Safety Review Committee prior to initiating the
Randomized Part of MajesTEC-7.
Graaf Engelbertlaan 75
Breda 4837 DS
NL
Graaf Engelbertlaan 75
Breda 4837 DS
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Have a diagnosis of multiple myeloma according to the International Myeloma
Working Group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria
- Be newly diagnosed and not considered a candidate for high-dose chemotherapy
with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) due to: ineligible due to advanced
age OR; ineligible due to the presence of comorbid condition(s) likely to have
a negative impact on tolerability of high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT OR;
deferral of high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT as initial treatment
- Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of
0 to 2
- A participant must agree not to be pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to
become pregnant while enrolled in this study or within 6 months after the last
dose of study treatment
- A participant must agree not to plan to father a child while enrolled in this
study or within 100 days after the last dose of study treatment
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
- Received any prior therapy for multiple myeloma or smoldering myeloma other
than a short course of corticosteroids (not to exceed 40 milligrams [mg] of
dexamethasone, or equivalent per day for a maximum of 4 days, total of 160 mg
dexamethasone or equivalent). In addition, received a cumulative dose of
systemic corticosteroids equivalent to greater than or equals to (>=)20 mg of
dexamethasone during the Screening Phase
- Had plasmapheresis within 28 days of randomization
- Had a stroke, transient ischemic attack, or seizure within 6 months prior to
randomization
- Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to teclistamab excipients
- Known contraindications to the use of daratumumab or lenalidomide per local
prescribing information
- Myeloma Frailty Index of >=2 with the exception of participants who have a
score of 2 based on age alone
For a full list of exclusion criteria, please refer to section 5.2 of the study
protocol.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EU-CTR | CTIS2023-503442-30-00 |
EudraCT | EUCTR2022-000909-28-NL |
CCMO | NL81954.056.22 |