Primary Objective: to compare improvement in arthrosis symptoms between patients operated with ROSA-assistance and conventionally operated patients.Secondary Objective(s): to compare clinical, procedural, logistic and economic outcomes between…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Glucose metabolism disorders (incl diabetes mellitus)
- Joint disorders
- Bone and joint therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
to compare improvement in arthrosis symptoms between patients operated with
ROSA-assistance and conventionally operated patients one year after surgery
Secondary outcome
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including OKS, EUR5D-5L, WOMAC, Pain
Catastrophizing Scale, Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire will be collected through
Phillips Vital Health, as explained in 8.1.1.
Surgical outcomes include #complications, duration of surgery, blood loss,
length of hospital stay, medication, anesthesia, analgesia and are documented
in the surgery report and available through SAP. Stability, implant position,
mobility, mechanical axis of the leg will be extracted from the ROSA-software.
Accuracy of surgical plan (#adaptations, #procedures without deviations from
plan) including implant size and level of resection and documented during
surgery using the ROSA-software. Logistic outcomes of surgery include surgery
ward occupation duration including preparation, operation duration (incision to
bandage), anaesthesia, transition from one patient to next, and is collected
through the BOZIS-system of Zuyderland Medical Center.
Clinical outcomes include alignment of the leg, 90-day and 1-year survival
implant and survival patient, reason for revision, type of revision will be
retrieved from electronic medical chart abstraction (SAP NetWeaver for Windows
10, V760 Final Release). Alignment (deviation, #outliers) will be assessed
before TKA and 3 months after surgery using a CT scan, per (pre-operative)
routine practice .
Physical activity and weight bearing will be assessed for 7 continuous days
using hip-worn accelerometers.
Metabolic outcomes include metabolic syndrome, body composition and handgrip
strength.
Metabolic syndrome will be quantified binary or as continuous scale. Binary
classification will be performed per present AHA/NHLBI ATPIII-criteria: at
least 3 out of 5 measures:
• waist circumference >=102 cm in men or >=88 cm in women;
• triglycerides: >=150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L), or on drug treatment for elevated
triglycerides;
• HDL-Cholesterol: <40 mg/dL (1.03 mmol/L) in men or <50 mg/dL (1.3 mmol/L) in
women or on drug treatment for reduced HDL-C;
• blood pressure: >=130 mm Hg systolic blood pressure, >=85 mm Hg diastolic blood
pressure, antihypertensive drug treatment;
• fasting glucose: >=5.3 mmol/L or on drug treatment for elevated glucose (20).
As continuous variable, we will utilize the Metabolic Syndrome Severity Scale
(MSSS) (21, 22):
• Males: -4.5639 + 0.0108*WC - 0.0254*HDL + 0.0040*SBP + 0.9085*ln(Tri)
• Females: -5.8119 + 0.0197*WC - 0.0149*HDL + 0.0067*SBP + 0.8585*ln(Tri)
Body Composition will be measured using bioimpedance analysis (Tanita DC 360 S,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Strength and fitness will be assessed as handgrip strength using hand-held
dynamometer (Jamar, Sammons Preston, Inc., Bolingbrook, IL, US), and 2-minute
walking, 30-second sit-to-stand, and timed-up-and-go tests.
Economic Outcomes
Cost of procedure (to hospital) including operation duration (room &
personnel), healthcare costs (to payer) including hospitalizations, medical
procedures, medications, outpatient clinic visits etc, productivity costs (paid
work due to absenteeism, unpaid work), paid and unpaid care, and their offset
to the clinical outcomes (cost-efficiency). Cost of procedure, medical
consumption, healthcare and productivity costs will be assessed using validated
questionnaires (iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ), iMTA Medical
Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)). Duration until, and quality of,
return-to-work will be inquired via previously developed questionnaires.
Cost-efficiency of the procedure will be calculated as cost per
quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE)7. Cost-efficiency will be compared
between study groups; in addition, the most progressive threshold of
cost-efficiency in orthopedic procedures of 50,000$/QALY will be used as
reference.8-10 Work (re-)integration will be assessed by validated
questionnaires (Work Ability Index WAI, Work Productivity and Activity
Impairment WPAI) on autonomy, work productivity, and work-home-interference.
8.1.3 Other study parameters
Other study parameters include gait and proprioception, and will be optional
for patients (see study design).
Gait will be assessed using the 3D VICON motion capture system. This system
uses 8 infrared cameras to follow movement. This measurement will be executed
under expert supervision of Zuyd Hogeschool staff.
Proprioception of the knee will be measured in a motorized carriage. Patients
will lay on a hospital bed where their leg is fixed in the motorized carriage.
This sled will passively extend and flex the knee. When patients get the
sensation of movement, they have to push a button. The reaction time and the
angle to sense the movement will be measured digitally.
24/7-glucose profiles will be assessed using continuous glucose monitors
(Freestyle Libre, Abbott Medical Nederland B.V., Veenendaal, NL).
Background summary
In 2015, an estimated 30 million adults suffered from osteoarthritis (OA).
Thereby, this disease accounts for 3% of all hospitalizations and for 20% of
all health care expenditures.1 Advanced OA requires total knee arthroplasty
(TKA). In developed countries, the mean utilization rate of TKA is estimated to
be 150-200 cases per 100.000 population in 2019,2 and the trend for annual knee
arthroplasties is increasing.3
Modern technology applied during surgeries is designed to further improve
placement and alignment of the implants, and thereby reducing short- and
long-term complications as well as improving patient-reported outcomes. While
patient-specific instrumentation has demonstrated promising, yet not convincing
results, newest technologies combine the development of surgical plans with
peri-operative assessments of outcomes. The first studies of robot-assisted
TKAs (RA-TKA) indeed demonstrated better short-term clinical outcomes when
compared to conventional manual technique with reduction in radiographic
outliers and reduced risks of iatrogenic soft tissues injuries (reduced blood
loss and postoperative drainage)4. Few studies suggest that costs and operative
time were higher for RA-TKA, but these costs may be offset by clinical
improvement and reduced health care utilization in the 90-day period after
surgery.5, 6
Longer-term studies, appropriately powered to detect clinically meaningful
differences in patient symptoms have yet to be performed. In addition to
filling this knowledge gap, we aim to provide a more comprehensive assessment
of functionality by measuring gait, physical activity, ability to work, and
more.
Study objective
Primary Objective: to compare improvement in arthrosis symptoms between
patients operated with ROSA-assistance and conventionally operated patients.
Secondary Objective(s): to compare clinical, procedural, logistic and economic
outcomes between patients operated with ROSA-assistance and conventionally
operated patients .
Study design
This is a randomized clinical study, in which 150 will be enrolled to
ROSA-assisted knee arthroplasty or conventional knee arthroplasty. Patients are
recruited at Zuyderland Medical Center, enrolled pre-operatively and followed
up for 10 years post-surgery.
Intervention
ROSA-assisted knee arthroplasty vs conventional knee arthroplasty
Study burden and risks
The clinical benefit of ROSA-assisted surgery has yet only been demonstrated in
cadaveric studies; the risks associated with this study or group allocation are
minimal, because only additional information is offered, and all decisions are
made by the operating surgeons. All procedures are deemed safe for clinical
practice.
The study only requires patients to invest 9 hours of their time, of which one
visit is in addition to regular care and takes ~2 hours. A proportion of
patients (50%) undergoes additional measurements (~2hours each) that are also
not routine clinical practice. These measurements do not carry an increased
risk as only daily tasks are being requested to the comfort of the patient, and
are performed under experienced, professional supervision.
Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1
Geleen 6162 BG
NL
Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1
Geleen 6162 BG
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
• Eligible for primary TKA
• age 40-90 years
• Body-Mass-Index 18.5-50.0 kg/m2
• American Society of Anaesthesiologists Class I-III
• Willingness and capability to understand and follow protocol
Exclusion criteria
• Rheuma-/trauma-indicated knee arthroplasty
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL79161.096.21 |