To investigate whether implementation of a best practice program for preoperative optimisation of patients with a focus on screening, assessment, and intervention of 8 potentially (partly) modifiable risk factors (low (aerobic) fitness level,…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Benign neoplasms gastrointestinal
- Gastrointestinal neoplasms malignant and unspecified
- Lifestyle issues
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary outcome is time to functional recovery after surgery, which is
achieved when all of the following five criteria are met: a) restored level of
mobility to the level of independence (or to the preoperative level in case
mobility was preoperatively already impaired), b) sufficient pain control with
oral medication alone, c) ability to maintain at least 50% daily required
protein and energy intake, d) no intravenous fluid administration, and e) no
clinical signs of infection (CRP < 150 mg/L and temperature < 38.5 degrees
Celsius).
Secondary outcome
The most relevant secondary outcomes are the Comprehensive Complication Index
(CCI), complications graded by Clavien-Dindo classification, length of hospital
stay, readmission rate, quality of life and (cost) effectiveness.
Background summary
For pancreatic tumours, pancreatic resection is the cornerstone of curative
treatment. It is a major abdominal operation with up to 50% postoperative
morbidity. Patients with pancreatic and periampullary (pre)malignant tumours
(and sometimes pancreatitis) often suffer from severe weight loss and loss of
physical condition at the time of diagnosis, also known as (cancer) cachexia.
In studies, audits and the daily clinical practice, focus is on the treatment
itself, its complications and (long-term) outcome after treatment. Little
attention is given to the physical and mental condition of the patient at the
time of the diagnosis, before the treatment commences. However, e.g. reduced
preoperative aerobic fitness and preoperative anxiety have been associated with
worse postoperative outcome such as a higher chance for a postoperative
complication. Adequate preoperative screening to identify patient-related
modifiable risk factors associated with adverse outcomes and subsequently
influencing these risk factors in a multimodal, patient centred prehabilitation
program appears a promising intervention to improve outcomes of patients
undergoing pancreatic resection. Therefore, the hypothesis is that if the
patient's condition is optimised before major pancreatic surgery, the risk for
or impact of complications can be reduced resulting in an accelerated time to
recovery with an improved quality of life. Although promising,
unfortunately, strong evidence to support the contribution of prehabilitation
to optimize the functional outcome after surgery is still lacking.
Study objective
To investigate whether implementation of a best practice program for
preoperative optimisation of patients with a focus on screening, assessment,
and intervention of 8 potentially (partly) modifiable risk factors (low
(aerobic) fitness level, malnutrition, low psychological resilience,
comorbidities (iron deficiency (anaemia), impaired glucose control and
frailty), and intoxications (alcohol and smoking behaviour)) will improve the
time to functional recovery compared to current practice.
Study design
A nationwide stepped-wedge cluster randomized superiority trial. In this design
all participating centres will cross over from current practice to the best
practice program, in a randomised order. At the end of the trial, all centres
will have implemented the best practice program. The best practice program is
seen as standard care. In the current study, health related outcomes before and
after introduction of the program will be compared.
Intervention
Preoperative screening of all patients scheduled for pancreatic resection on
(aerobic) fitness level, malnutrition risk, psychological resilience,
haemoglobin, iron and HbA1c concentration, frailty, and alcohol and smoking
behaviour. All patients are provided with a patient-tailored, multimodal
prehabilitation program, in which these potentially (partly) modifiable factors
are preoperatively addressed. This is considered the best practice care.
Study burden and risks
Prehabilitation in this study is considered standard care in the Netherlands
for pancreatic surgery. Various prehabilitation programs have been proven save
in different patient groups, like patients with colorectal cancer. Therefore,
the risks associated with this program are very low. All of the 8 preoperative
interventions are safe and already provided as standard care in some hospitals
in the Netherlands. It is important to standardize the preoperative
interventions in all hospitals to assess its effectiveness. The preoperative
program and additional questionnaire can impose a burden to the patient in
terms of time investment. Patients could benefit from the best practice
preoperative program, since our hypothesis is that patients have a shorter time
to functional recovery.
Universiteitssingel 50
Maastricht 6229 ER
NL
Universiteitssingel 50
Maastricht 6229 ER
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
-Patients scheduled to undergo pancreatic resection in one of the 13
participating DPCG centers in the Netherlands (including for (pre)malignant or
benign lesions and chronic pancreatitis) or the intention to undergo pancreatic
resection after neoadjuvant treatment (for malignant tumours)
- Understanding of and being able to read the Dutch language
Exclusion criteria
- Age < 18 years
- Being legally incapable
- Undergoing an acute pancreatic resection (resection scheduled within two
weeks)
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT05851534 |
CCMO | NL85426.068.23 |