The aim of this study on the one hand is to gain insight into: 1) the effects of a PE program for older adults with ASD in terms of knowledge and recognition of ASD and traits, a better acceptance of the diagnosis, improved coping with ASD, improved…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Developmental disorders NEC
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Clinical outcomes, which are quality of life, acceptance of diagnosis,
knowledge of ASD, recognition of ASD traits, coping with ASD, autistic traits,
resilience and comorbid psychological symptoms.
* Quality of life is assessed with the Mental Health Quality of Life
Questionnaire (MHQoL-7).
* Acceptance of diagnosis, knowledge and coping with ASD are assessed by both
patients and informants from their environment using the Knowledge, Recognition
and Acceptance in Autism Diagnosis Questionnaire (VKHAA and VKHAA-N).
* Acceptance of ASD (-diagnosis) is further assessed with the Acceptance
Questionnaire.
* Autistic characteristics are assessed (hetero-)anamnestically with the Social
Responsiveness Scale-Adults (SRS-A).
* Comorbid psychological distress is assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory
(BSI).
All these assessments are conducted (1) at baseline (after diagnosis and
informed consent); (2) before the patient begins PE (on average, three months
after baseline; participants in the control condition receive this measurement
three months after baseline; (3) after PE (on average, two months after the
start of the PE program; participants in the control condition receive this
measurement 5 months after baseline); (4) at 9-month follow-up (nine months
after the second measurement).
Experiences with the course will be explored with two items from the VKHAA and
the VKHAA-N (items 26 and 27) as well as through 10 to 15 semistructured
interviews with patients after their course participation.
Secondary outcome
The number and proportion of ASD diagnoses in the participating centres
(collected from the information and registration systems of the mental health
care centres) from one years before, during the project, and at one year
follow-up. Quality of psychodiagnostics with regard to ASD is explored on the
basis of the psychodiagnostical reports that are the result of the examination
into ASD.
Background summary
The detection of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in older adults in Dutch
(specialised) mental health care is improving, but underdiagnosis remains. This
is often the result of autism characteristics going unrecognised, doubt on how
to perform the diagnosis, and uncertainty about the next steps after diagnosis.
Meanwhile, older adults with ASD experience a low quality of life (QoL) and a
high rate of psychopathology across the life span and into old age.
Additionally, Dutch and international treatment guidelines advocate
psychoeducation (PE) as the first intervention after patients have been
diagnosed with ASD. However, as PE for older patients with ASD is hardly
available in the Netherlands, access to PE is severely limited for these older
adults. Hence, it is important to improve detection and diagnosis of ASD and
increase the availability of PE for older adults.
The hypotheses of this study are 1) that delivering an adapted and improved PE
program for older adults will result in more knowledge and recognition of ASD,
a better acceptance of the diagnosis, improved coping with ASD, improved
resilience and comorbid general psychological distress, and ultimately in
higher quality of life, compared to the situation in which patients with ASD
receive no PE and 2) that detection and diagnosis of ASD in older adults will
significantly increase following training of professionals.
Study objective
The aim of this study on the one hand is to gain insight into: 1) the effects
of a PE program for older adults with ASD in terms of knowledge and recognition
of ASD and traits, a better acceptance of the diagnosis, improved coping with
ASD, improved resilience and comorbid general psychological distress - and
ultimately higher quality of live; 2) the experiences of older adults with ASD
following the PE program, and 3) the effects of providing training and
education to mental health care providers in detection and diagnosis of ASD in
older adults, with the expectation that this contributes to an increase in the
number and proportion of ASD diagnoses in older adults in the Netherlands.
Additionally, the quality of the diagnostical process is explored on the basis
of the psychodiagnostic research reports that are produced as a result of the
diagnostic research into ASD.
Study design
The effects of training and education in detection and diagnosis of ASD in
older adults, and the effects of the PE program will be evaluated in a Stepped
Wedge Trial Design (SWTD), with the intervention sequentially rolled-out in ten
(specialised) mental healthcare organisations. Furthermore, a pre-post design
will be used to compare the situation before the roll-out period with the
situation after the roll-out period in terms of diagnosis and individual
outcomes such as knowledge regarding ASD. Qualitative measures will be used to
assess the experiences of older adults with ASD who participated in the PE
program.
Intervention
The psycho-education intervention consists of education in detection and
diagnosis of ASD in older adults for mental health professionals and of an
adapted PE program for older adults with a recent diagnosis of ASD. The
psycho-education program consists of eight, two hour group meetings on a weekly
basis.
The content of the adaptations to the PE course is based on the findings of our
earlier exploratory study of psychoeducation for older people with a late
diagnosis of autism (Lenders et al., in press), years of experience with the
current course at five institutions that offer this course to older people with
a recent diagnosis of autism, meetings with experience volunteers, and meetings
with the current trainers at the organizations involved.
Study burden and risks
For patients, benefits will be considerable as they will receive a PE program
that is recommended by the Dutch multidisciplinary guideline for ASD in adults,
and although being the recommended first intervention by treatment guidelines,
is not provided to them momentarily.
The benefits account for patients who provide informed consent to participate
in the research and patients who do not give their consent, since the same
treatment will be available for both. We consider the burden of participating
in the research, which consists of filling out questionnaires and inviting a
proxy of their choice to fill out two of the same questionnaires, to be
limited. Firstly, because this will be done in the context of treatment that
fits the recommended first intervention by treatment guidelines and thus does
not provide an extra mental burden. Moreover, the time needed to fill out these
questionnaires is limited: approximately 40 to 60 minutes per measurement
point, and there are no indications that risks are involved with regard to the
topics of these questionnaires; specifically in a similar study by our research
group, no adverse events or risks were observed.
Additional potential benefits exist in the form of increased detection and
diagnosis of ASD in older adults across participating organisations, while the
burden of participating in the study hardly exceeds time and effort spent in
diagnostic efforts as usual, yet lightens efforts spent on informing patients
with an ASD diagnosis as this can be done in a group format rather than on an
individual basis. The only extra effort is limited to informing patients about
the study with verbal and written information.
Professor Cobbenhagenlaan 125
Tilburg 5037 DB
NL
Professor Cobbenhagenlaan 125
Tilburg 5037 DB
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Older adults aged 60 and over diagnosed with ASD no longer than 12 months
before start of the intervention by a multidisciplinary team according to the
Dutch multidisciplinary guidelines, as confirmed by the DSM-5 interview for ASD
(Spek, n.d.), or the Netherlands Interview for Diagnosis of ASD in adults
(NIDA; Vuijk, 2016).
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria in the first place apply to participation in the PE course.
And thus make participation in the study impossible. This concerns:
- Comorbid mental disorder that needs acute treatment and severely interferes
with a group treatment (for example psychosis).
- major neurocognitive disorder (for example dementia or acquired brain injury).
- Substance abuse disorder, that requires detoxification.
- Insufficient command of the Dutch language.
- And/or an IQ below 70.
These exclusion criteria are assessed by clinical consensus after extensive
psychiatric and psychological assessment by the multiple disciplinary team of
the participating centers. The trainers of the intervention will also judge the
presence of exclusion criteria for participants and informants at the start of
the intervention during an intake session, which is part of the intervention.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT06127472 |
CCMO | NL84067.028.23 |