This study has been transitioned to CTIS with ID 2024-518304-53-00 check the CTIS register for the current data. The primary objective of the study is to compare the PFS of SPd versus EloPd in patients with MM who have received 1 to 4 prior anti-MM…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Haematopoietic neoplasms (excl leukaemias and lymphomas)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary endpoint:
PFS, defined as time from date of randomization until the date of first
confirmed progressive disease (PD), per IMWG response criteria, or death due to
any cause, whichever occurs first.
Secondary outcome
Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoints
• OOR, defined as any response >= PR (i.e., PR [partial response], VGPR [very
good partial response], CR ([complete response], or sCR [stringent complete
response])
• Overall survival (OS)
Additional Secondary Efficacy Endpoints
• Clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as response >=minimal response (MR)
• Duration of response (DOR)
• Time to next treatment (TNT)
• Time to initial response (TTR)
• Time to best response (TTBR)
• Time to progression after first post-SPd/EloPd treatment or death (PFS2)
Safety and tolerability of study treatment will be evaluated based on AE
reports, vital signs, clinical laboratory results, electrocardiogram (ECG) and
physical examination findings, by means of the occurrence, nature, and severity
of AEs as categorized by the CTCAE v5.0.
Patient-reported quality of life (QoL, as measured by the European Organisation
for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ C30),
EORTC-QLQ-MY20, and EQ-5D-5L instruments..
Selinexor and pomalidomide PK parameters, estimations of maximum plasma
concentration, area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC), and
apparent clearance, if feasible.
Background summary
Pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) is a commonly used backbone regimen in
patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) worldwide. There
are several triplets based on Pd, including in combination with proteasome
inhibitors (PIs), elotuzumab, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb).
However, the increasing use of anti-CD38 mAbs and PIs in the first or early
relapse lines of therapy makes their subsequent use in combination with
pomalidomide in RRMM less optimal in clinical practice, with data indicating
limited efficacy with re-exposure. For patients who have been previously
treated with an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD; e.g., lenalidomide), a PI, and an
anti-CD38 mAb, there is a significant need for combinations with Pd that
utilize novel mechanisms of action to improve patient benefit.
This trial will evaluate the effect of the role of 2 drugs with novel
mechanisms of action, selinexor and elotuzumab, in combination with Pd in
patients with RRMM who have been previously treated with an IMiD, a PI, and an
anti-CD38 mAb. Starting in protocol version 2.0, eligible patients must have
received an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody as part of the treatment regimen
immediately prior to study enrollment.
Selinexor is a novel, oral nuclear exportin inhibitor approved by the European
Medicines Agency (EMA) and by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1) in
combination with dexamethasone is indicated for the treatment of adult patients
with RRMM who have received at least 4 prior therapies and whose disease is
refractory to at least 2 proteasome inhibitors (PIs), at least 2 IMiDs, and an
anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb); and 2) in combination with bortezomib and
dexamethasone for the treatment of adult patients with MM who have received at
least 1 prior therapy. In addition, it has been approved by the US FDA for the
treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL, not otherwise
specified, including DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma, after at least 2
lines of systemic therapy.
Further evaluation of selinexor-based combinations was initiated to control MM
as relapses are frequent and response to therapy declines as later lines are
used. The current trial is based on results from studies KCP-330-017 (STOMP;
NCT02343042) and XPORT-MM-028 (NCT04414475). As of 06 September 2022, a total
of 95 patients received the SPd regimen. Dosing schedules ranged from 60 mg to
80 mg selinexor twice weekly (BIW) or 40 to 100 mg selinexor QW. Dexamethasone
was dosed at 40 mg weekly, and pomalidomide was dosed 2 to 4 mg once daily (QD)
on Days 1 through 21, administered in 28-day cycles (White 2021). Among
patients with pomalidomide-naïve or non-refractory MM in STOMP (n=44), overall
response rate (ORR) was 57% and median progression-free survival (mPFS) was
12.2 months. Two expansion cohorts dosed with selinexor either at 40 mg QW
(SPd-40) or 60 mg QW (SPd-60) in combination with pomalidomide 4 mg once daily
(QD) on Days 1 through 21 and dexamethasone 40 mg QW were enrolled. Preliminary
data available at the inception of this study suggested that the SPd-60 regimen
conferred higher response rates and deeper responses compared to SPd-40.
However, Grade 1/2 AEs and dose modifications were more frequent in the SPd-60
cohort compared to SPd-40 (White 2021a). Initially and until protocol version
1.6, this study enrolled patients to 2 SPd cohorts, SPd-40 and SPd-60. By
protocol version 2.0, sufficient follow-up data in patients treated with SPd-60
and SPd-40 in the STOMP and XPORT-MM-028 studies accumulated to identify SPd-40
as the optimal dose regimen of SPd based on benefit/risk assessment; thus, only
the SPd-40 regimen will be compared to EloPd starting in protocol version 2.0.
The subset of patients in STOMP and XPORT-MM-028 who had received prior
anti-CD38 mAb treatment was analyzed, with data indicating an overall response
rate of 63.6%; the ORR was 62.5% for those patients who received the anti-CD38
mAb treatment in the line of therapy immediately prior to start of SPd. The
mPFS seen in patients who received anti-CD38 mAb treatment prior to SPd-40 and
SPd-60 were similar at 11.2 and 8.9 months, respectively (unpublished data).
Elotuzumab is a signaling lymphocytic activation molecule F7 (SLAMF7)-directed
immunostimulatory antibody indicated in combination with pomalidomide and
dexamethasone (EloPd) for the treatment of adult patients with MM who have
received at least 2 prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a PI.
Elotuzumab induces natural killer (NK) cell-mediated antibody-dependent
cellular cytotoxicity on SLAMF7-expressing myeloma cells and direct activation
of NK cells. It may also facilitate macrophage-mediated killing of myeloma
cells (Collins 2013, Balasa 2015, Kurdi 2018). Previous studies of the EloPd
regimen in patients with at least 2 prior lines of therapy showed a mPFS of
10.3 months and ORR of 53% (Dimopoulos 2018). There are no prospective data on
the outcome of treatment with EloPd in patients with prior therapy with an
anti-CD38 mAb; however, retrospective studies have reported lower ORR and PFS
with EloPd in patients previously exposed to daratumumab (Hoylman 2020, Becnel
2018).
There is a growing demand for combination therapy that minimizes clinic visits.
SPd is an all-oral combination that should reduce patients* burden relative to
other anti-MM treatment regimens that require a subcutaneous or intravenous
(IV) infusion and frequent clinic visits. All other approved Pd-based triplet
combinations require parenteral administration, entailing hospital/clinic
visits.
Study objective
This study has been transitioned to CTIS with ID 2024-518304-53-00 check the CTIS register for the current data.
The primary objective of the study is to compare the PFS of SPd versus EloPd in
patients with MM who have received 1 to 4 prior anti-MM lines of therapy and
never received pomalidomide, selinexor, or elotuzumab. Patients must have had
prior treatment with an IMiD (lenalidomide) and a PI in the past, and must have
received treatment with an anti-CD38 mAb in the immediate line of therapy prior
to start of study treatment. Additional objectives are to compare clinical
efficacy and safety of SPd versus EloPd, to characterize the pharmacokinetics
(PK) of selinexor and pomalidomide, and to evaluate potential exposure-response
relationships for applicable efficacy and safety endpoints in patients treated
with SPd.
Study design
This study is comprised of 2 parts:
• Part 1 included patients randomized to 3 arms: selinexor 40 mg QW in
combination with Pd (SPd-40), selinexor 60 mg QW in combination with Pd
(SPd-60), and elotuzumab in combination with Pd (EloPd), to confirm the optimal
dose of selinexor for Part 2 of the study. Data from STOMP and XPORT-MM-028
confirmed the optimal selinexor regimen to be SPd-40; thus, starting in
protocol version 2.0, the study will enroll patients under Part 2.
• Part 2 will include patients randomized in a 1:1 manner between the SPd-40
and EloPd arms until ~222 patients are included in the ITT population.
The final PFS will include patients from Part 2 as well as patients from the
SPd-40 and EloPd arms from Part 1 who were treated with an anti-CD38 mAb in
their immediate prior line of therapy.
Intervention
Please refer to tables 2 and 3 in the synopsis.
Study burden and risks
Please refer to appendix D of the ICF.
dr. Molewaterplein 40
Rotterdam 3015 GD
NL
dr. Molewaterplein 40
Rotterdam 3015 GD
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
There is no difference in the patient population enrolled in Part 1 or Part 2
of the study. 1. Relapsed or refractory MM per IMWG criteria with measurable
disease as defined by at least 1 of the following: a. Serum M-protein >=0.5 g/dL
(>=5 g/L) by serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) or, for immunoglobulin (Ig) A
or D myeloma, by quantitative serum IgA or IgD levels >=0.5 g/dL. b. Urinary
M-protein excretion >=200 mg/24 hours. c. Serum free light chain (FLC) >=100
mg/L, provided that the FLC ratio is abnormal (normal FLC ratio: 0.26 to 1.65).
2. Received at least 1 and no more than 4 prior anti-MM lines of therapy.
Induction therapy followed by stem cell transplant and
consolidation/maintenance therapy will be considered as 1 line of therapy. 3.
Prior therapy that includes >=2 consecutive cycles of lenalidomide and a
proteasome inhibitor given alone or in combination.
4. Prior therapy with an anti-CD38 mAb as part of their immediate last line of
therapy prior to study entry (Before protocol version 2.0 patients with any
prior therapy with an anti-CD38 mAb were eligible for the study.) 5. Eastern
Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of <=2. 6. Resolution of
any clinically significant non-hematological toxicities (if any) from previous
treatments to Grade <=1 by Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1). Patients with clinically
significant Grade 2 neuropathy from previous treatments may be included. 7.
Adequate hepatic function within 28 days prior to C1D1: a. Total bilirubin <2 ×
upper limit of normal (ULN) (except patients with Gilbert's syndrome who must
have a total bilirubin of <3 × ULN) b. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and
alanine aminotransferase (ALT) <2.5 × ULN 8. Adequate renal function within 28
days prior to C1D1 (estimated creatinine clearance [CrCl] of >=15 mL/min (not
requiring dialysis), calculated using the formula of Cockcroft and Gault or
measured by 24-hour urine collection). 9. Adequate hematopoietic function
within 7 days prior to C1D1 defined as absolute neutrophil count >=1.5 x 10^9/L,
hemoglobin >=8.5 g/dL, and platelet count >=100 x 10^9/L (patients for whom <50%
of bone marrow nucleated cells are plasma cells) or >=75 x 109/L (patients for
whom >=50% of bone marrow nucleated cells are plasma cells) a. Patients
receiving hematopoietic growth factor support, including erythropoietin,
darbepoetin, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte
macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and platelet stimulators (e.g.,
romiplostim, or eltrombopag) must have a 2-week interval between growth factor
support and the Screening assessments. b. Patients must have: - At least a
2-week interval from the last red blood cell (RBC) transfusion prior to the
Screening hemoglobin assessment, and - At least a 1-week interval from the last
platelet transfusion prior to the Screening platelet assessment. However,
patients may receive RBC and/or platelet transfusions as clinically indicated
per institutional guidelines during the study. 10. Patients with active
hepatitis B virus (HBV) are eligible if antiviral therapy for hepatitis B has
been given for >8 weeks and viral load is <100 IU/mL. Patients with evidence of
non-active HBV should be discussed with the Medical Monitor and should be
monitored or receive prophylaxis at the discretion of the Investigator and
study site institutional guidelines 11. Patients with a history of hepatitis C
virus (HCV) are eligible if they have received adequate curative anti-HCV
treatment and HCV viral load is below the limit of quantification. 12. Patients
with a history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are eligible if they have
CD4+ T cell counts >=350 ells/µcL, negative viral load, and no history of
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)- defining opportunistic infections in
the last year and should be on established antiretroviral therapy (ART) for at
least 4 weeks.
13. Global (excluding Germany): Female patients of childbearing
potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 10 to 14
days and a second negative serum test within 24 hours prior to the first
dose of study treatment. Female patients of childbearing potential ho are
sexually active must agree to use a barrier method in addition to highly
effective methods of contraception throughout the study and for 90 days
following the last dose of study treatment.
Germany only: Premenopausal female patients of childbearing potential
must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 10 to 14 days and a
second negative serum test within 24 hours prior to the first dose of
study treatment. Premenopausal female patients of childbearing
potential who are sexually active must agree to use a barrier method in
addition to highly effective methods of contraception throughout the
study and for 90 days following the last dose of study treatment.
Please refer to protocol for inclusion criteria #14 to 17.
Exclusion criteria
There is no difference in the patient population enrolled in Part 1 or Part 2
of the study. This trial will enroll patients who meet all of the inclusion
criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Smoldering
MM. 2. Plasma cell leukemia. 3. Documented active systemic amyloid light chain
amyloidosis. 4. Any history of central nervous system MM. 5. Prior treatment
with: a. a selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound, including
selinexor. b. pomalidomide or elotuzumab. 6. Any concurrent medical condition
or disease that is likely to interfere with study procedures. 7. Uncontrolled
active infection requiring parenteral antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals
within 1 week prior to C1D1. Patients on prophylactic antibiotics or with a
controlled infection within 1 week prior to C1D1 are acceptable. 8. Known
intolerance, hypersensitivity, or contraindication to any of the study
treatments. 9. Radiation, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy or any other
anticancer therapy including investigational therapies and high dose
dexamethasone (i.e., 40 mg daily for 4 days per week) <=2 weeks prior to C1D1.
Patients on long-term glucocorticoids during Screening do not require a washout
period, but must be able to tolerate the specified dexamethasone dose in this
study. 10. Prior autologous stem cell transplantation <100 days or allogeneic
stem cell transplantation <4 months prior to C1D1. 11. Major surgery within 4
weeks prior to C1D1. 12. Active graft versus host disease after allogeneic stem
cell transplantation. 13. Pregnant or breastfeeding females. 14. In the opinion
of the Investigator, patients who are below their ideal body weight and would
be unduly impacted by changes in their weight. 15. Clinically significant
cardiac disease, including: a. Myocardial infarction within 6 months before
C1D1, or unstable or uncontrolled disease/condition related to or affecting
cardiac function (e.g., unstable angina, congestive heart failure, New York
Heart Association Class III-IV). b. Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia (CTCAE v.
5.0 Grade 2 or higher) or clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG)
abnormalities. c. Screening 12-lead ECG showing a baseline QT interval as
corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF [APPENDIX 4]) >470 msec. 16. Any active
gastrointestinal dysfunction interfering with the patient's ability to swallow
tablets, or any active gastrointestinal dysfunction that could interfere with
absorption of study treatment. 17. Any active, serious psychiatric, medical, or
other conditions/situations that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could
interfere with treatment, compliance, or the ability to give informed consent.
18. Contraindication to or inability to tolerate any of the required
concomitant drugs such as dual antiemetics (Section 10.1.1 ), or supportive
treatments. 19. Patients unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EU-CTR | CTIS2024-518304-53-00 |
EudraCT | EUCTR2021-001691-41-NL |
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT05028348 |
CCMO | NL78293.078.22 |