To investigate whether the addition of a custom made 3D printed scaffold to standard treatment increases healing and decreases the need for secondary surgery in segmental defects of long bones with a length of more than 5 cm compared to the standard…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Bone and joint therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Follow-up is scheduled at regular intervals; six weeks, twelve weeks, six
months, and one year. The primary study endpoint is the volume of newly formed
bone at the defect site, based on CT-scans at six months follow-up.
Secondary outcome
Secondary outcome parameters are secondary interventions, quality of life
(EQ-5D5L, PROMIS), lower extremity function scale or disabilities of the arm,
shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire if applicable, necessary
reinterventions, recurrence/persistence of infection, burden-of-disease and
cost-effectiveness, including the Medical Consumption Questionnaires (MCQ) and
Productivity Cost Questionnaire (PCQ).
Background summary
Bone defects have a devastating impact on quality of life. The affected limb
cannot be used and the subsequent lack of mobility results in a low
health-related quality of life. Treatment of bone defects is challenging,
especially when infection is present, and frequently ends in an amputation. To
restore bone continuity, bone regeneration has to occur and that requires
several biological and mechanical components. A good soft tissue coverage, the
presence of cells, growth factors and a scaffold are all prerequisites for bone
regeneration in an environment that has to be well vascularized and free of
infection. Nowadays, bone autograft supplemented with bone marrow stem cells
and bone growth factors is the gold standard to improve healing in traumatic
bone defects. However, in larger defects (>5cm) the treatment remains
challenging due to limited scaffolding and treatment-resistant infection.
Application of an innovative, custom made, 3D-printed cage made of poly-*-
caprolactone with ß-tri-calcium phosphate (PCL/TCP) has the potential to
improve the clinical outcome substantially.
Study objective
To investigate whether the addition of a custom made 3D printed scaffold to
standard treatment increases healing and decreases the need for secondary
surgery in segmental defects of long bones with a length of more than 5 cm
compared to the standard treatment, which consists of a combination of
autologous bone, stem cells, osteoconductive materials and growth factors.
Study design
Prospective, single-center randomized clinical trial, single blinded.
Intervention
The control group will receive the standard treatment for these defects in our
center. This treatment consists of a two-stage surgical procedure called the
Induced Membrane Technique (IMT). During the first stage, the surgical site is
debrided and a cement spacer is placed to initiate the formation of a membrane
around the spacer; a physiological response to the implanted foreign body (the
cement spacer). If deemed necessary, soft tissue coverage via free flap
transfer is performed as well. In the second stage, the spacer is removed and
autograft bone, Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (RIA) derived autograft and Bone
Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC), and factor P-15 (iFactor, Cerapedics,
Westminster, USA) are applied in the bone defect area. The experimental group
will receive the treatment as described before, combined with a 3D-printed
scaffold consisting of PCL/TCP (Osteopore, Taman Jurong, Singapore).
Study burden and risks
The choice for the timing of the endpoints is based on regular care in order to
limit the burden for participants. This is also the case for all radiological
examinations including the CT scan at six months. The study requires 2
additional CT scans, the radiation exposure of these scans is lower than the
amount of natural radiation humans are exposed to every year.
Participants will be requested to fill out the above described questionnaires
at each follow-up moment; six weeks, twelve weeks, six months, and one year. We
classify the burden for these questionnaires as minimal in accordance with
previous evaluations by the local ethical committee. The main risks for the
participants are all related to the medical condition of the bone defect and
are, as we foresee, not related to the study participation. In general, these
risks are infection at the surgical site, persistent/permanent pain at the
surgical site, sensory loss or disturbance at the surgical site and, when
utilized, free flap failure.
P.debyelaan 25
Maastricht 6229 HX
NL
P.debyelaan 25
Maastricht 6229 HX
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Posttraumatic critical size bone defect of 5 or more centimeters of a long bone
after debridement
Age over 18 years
Informed consent for surgical treatment and participation in the study
Exclusion criteria
Segmental bone defects < 5 cm in length after debridement
Inability to understand the Dutch language
Inability to comply with follow-up
Untreated metabolic comoribities (such as diabetes and osteoporosis)
Patients with cancer or bone defects due to a malignancy
Unable to participate judged by treating physician
Paraplegia
Interoperative exclusion due to instrumental problems
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL84289.068.23 |
Other | OMON register, te vinden onder de titel van de studie |