Primary Objective: What is the difference in the effectiveness of the Food Pharmacy Program in glycaemic regulation compared to nutrition coaching performed by dieticians after three months in overweight adults with type 2 diabetes? Secondary…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Glucose metabolism disorders (incl diabetes mellitus)
- Glucose metabolism disorders (incl diabetes mellitus)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Between-group difference in HbA1c (mmol/mol) from baseline to three months.
HbA1c will be measured using routine clinical lab procedures.
Secondary outcome
- Anthropometry: Body weight and waist circumference
- Cardiovascular risk factors: LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, HDL
cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting blood glucose and blood pressure, measured
with routine lab procedures
- Quality of life
- Work productivity
- Demographic variables, drug use, smoking and drinking habits, exercise and
(diabetes) medication use
- Food intake and adherence to the diet intervention (% used products of food
boxes)
- Patient satisfaction
- Number of participants that drop out
Background summary
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) continues to rise. In the Netherlands,
it is estimated that 1,2 million people are currently affected by T2D, which is
expected to grow to 1,4 million by 2040. In the European region, approximately
60 million people live with diabetes, making it one of the leading causes of
death and disability.
Unhealthy diets and physical inactivity can lead to an increase in overweight
and obesity, especially among socioeconomically disadvantaged communities. In
addition, people with low socio-economic status (SES) are more likely to
develop T2D. One reason for this could be the financial aspect of food.
Research done in the Netherlands found an inverse association between energy
density and the costs of food items. Energy-dense, nutritionally depleted food
products, such as refined grains, added sugar, and fats, cost significantly
less than nutrient-dense foods.
Nowadays, several dietary interventions have been shown to be effective for
patients with T2D, including the Mediterranean diet. This diet is characterized
by a high intake of vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains, nuts, fish, and
olive oil, which has been associated with several health benefits. Intake of
products rich in fibers, mono- and poly-saturated fatty acids, vitamins,
probiotics, antioxidants, and low-glycaemic foods can decrease inflammation and
insulin resistance and improve glycaemic control in diabetes patients. For
dietary treatment to be successful in people with T2D, individual
responsibility and intrinsic motivation for change are critical enablers.
However, increasing costs of healthy products, such as those recommended in the
Mediterranean diet, pose a barrier to maintaining healthy dietary patterns,
especially among patients experiencing food or financial insecurity. To support
patients in overcoming these barriers, a growing body of evidence is examining
the use of food as a medical prescription to improve access to fresh produce.
Several product interventions have shown a positive association between
providing food via incentives such as food vouchers or boxes and positive
health outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis by Haslam et al. (2023)
lists HbA1c improvement, weight reduction, reduction of systolic blood
pressure, increased health index scores, and increased vegetables and fruit
servings as the primary outcomes. Bhat et al. (2021) point out that despite
possible positive outcomes such as increased fruit and vegetable consumption,
decreased BMI and HbA1c, most of the studies were designed in
quasi-experimental (pre/post) interventions without a control group. Randomized
control trials investigating the effect of healthy food prescriptions on diet
quality and cardiovascular risk factors among T2D patients are lacking,
especially in Europe.
Study objective
Primary Objective: What is the difference in the effectiveness of the Food
Pharmacy Program in glycaemic regulation compared to nutrition coaching
performed by dieticians after three months in overweight adults with type 2
diabetes?
Secondary Objectives:
1. What is the difference in weight loss, waist circumference, cardiovascular
risk factors, and diabetic medication usage between FPP and nutrition coaching
after three months in overweight adults with type 2 diabetes?
2. What is the difference in fruit and vegetable consumption between the
intervention and control groups?
3. What is the difference in the quality of life, treatment satisfaction,
compliance, and adherence between the intervention and control groups?
Study design
The above-presented objectives will be answered by conducting a randomized
controlled pilot study in which eligible T2D patients will be randomized to
either the control or intervention group.
Intervention
Both groups will be recommended to follow the Mediterranean diet. Participants
in the intervention group will receive weekly whole plant-based food boxes
supplied from local farms in the South Holland region for 12 weeks.
Additionally, during the intervention, patients will be asked to participate in
two health facilitated by a dietician and two culinary medicine workshops
facilitated by a trained chef. Additionally, at baseline, week 4 and week 12
of the intervention, patients will receive coaching sessions with a dietician.
The control group participants will receive three coaching sessions with a
dietician (usual care) at baseline, week 4 and week 12, provided under the
reimbursement scheme of the basic insurance package in the Netherlands.
Study burden and risks
The burden and risks associated with participation in the study are considered
to be low. The participants will benefit from the intervention by receiving
food boxes and professional support to help them improve their health. All
participants will be asked to attend the standard visits at the doctor's office
to collect the cardiovascular risk factors and perform anthropometric
measurements at the dietician's office. Participants of the intervention group
are asked to pick up weekly boxes in Rotterdam South and attend health and
cooking workshops, which will require time investment.
Dr. Molewaterplein 40
Rotterdam 3015GD
NL
Dr. Molewaterplein 40
Rotterdam 3015GD
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Diagnosed T2D
- BMI > 25 kg/m2
- Aged 18 - 75 years
- Be living in Rotterdam South
- Yearly income below 25.000 euro
Exclusion criteria
- Pregnancy or lactation during the trial
- Severe psychiatric disorders, use of antipsychotic drugs
- Serious heart conditions such as: significant heart arrhythmia, unstable
angina pectoris, decompensated congestive heart failure
- Organ failure
- Untreated hypothyroidism
- End-stage renal failure
- Carcinomas
- Transplants, myocardial infarct, cerebrovascular accident, or any large-scale
surgery within the last 3 months
- Corticosteroid-induced diabetes (in patients still using corticosteroids)
- Food allergies for the products delivered in the food boxes
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL87221.078.24 |