The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as GG>=2) in targeted biopsies based on PGaVision imaging (PCaVision pathway) in comparison with the detection rate…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Prostatic disorders (excl infections and inflammations)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint of this study is clinically significant (GG >=2) PCa. The
detection rate of this endpoint in any core for each biopsy strategy will be
assessed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of PCaVision targeted biopsy
strategy in comparison with MRI targeted biopsy strategy. The detection rate is
expressed with patients as the unit of analysis. The primary endpoint will be
determined for two (separately powered) cohorts (1) biopsy-naïve or prior
negative and (2) patients in active surveillance
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints:
· proportion of men in whom targeted biopsies could have been safely omitted in
the PCaVision pathway compared to the MRI pathway. This is defined as the
number of men in whom no lesions for target biopsies have been identified by
PCaVision while no clinically significant cancer is detected in either MRI
targeted biopsies or systematic biopsies. The combined findings of all types of
biopsies will serve as the reference standard to define *safe*.
· same diagnostic accuracy analyses as described in the primary endpoint for
different definitions of the target condition. This includes: (i) ISUP >= 3 in
any of the biopsy cores taken from a lesion; (ii) ISUP >= 2 with cribriform
growth and/or intraductal carcinoma (CR/IDC) in any of the biopsy cores taken
from a lesion; (iii) ISUP = 1.
· comparison of the number of men in whom the PCaVision pathway provided
insufficient quality images or targeted biopsies with the number of men with
insufficient quality MRI images or target biopsies in the MRI pathway.
· Detection rate of clinically significant PCa (GG >=2) for a different patient
subpopulations. This includes (i) patients under 5-ARI treatment for at least 3
months; (ii) patients with previous prostate surgeries for LUTS; (iii) biopsy
naïve and prior negative without taking into account patients under 5-ARI
treatment for at least 3 months and those who previously underwent prostate
surgery, (iv) patients in active surveillance without taking into account
patients under 5-ARI treatment for at least 3 months and those who previously
underwent prostate surgery.
Background summary
Current imaging techniques for the detection and grading of prostate cancer are
imperfect, which can lead to unnecessary biopsies, suboptimal treatment, and
missed clinically significant cancers. We hypothesize that computer analysis
(PCaVision) of 3D multiparametric ultrasound can accurately detect, localize,
and assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. 3D multiparametric ultrasound
could provide a more cost-effective and streamlined imaging technique compared
to the current standard: MRI.
Study objective
The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of the detection rate
of clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as GG>=2) in targeted
biopsies based on PGaVision imaging (PCaVision pathway) in comparison with the
detection rate of clinically significant cancer in targeted biopsies based on
MRI (MRI pathway).
Study design
This study is a prospective, multicenter diagnostic accuracy study with a fully
paired design in men suspected of prostate cancer.
In summary, all patients will undergo imaging using MRI and PCaVision during
which suspicious lesions will be identified based on each imaging technique
independently with readers being blinded for the results of the other imaging
technique. In addition, biopsies can be performed. What biopsie strategy is
performed is based on the imaging results and local standard of care. In case
of a suspect lesion on imaging targeted biopsies will be performed. Local
standard might dictate that these targeted biopsies are supplemented by
systematic biopsies, this won't be part of the study protocol. In case of
negative imaging, biopsies can be omitted or systematic biopsies can be
performed. This also depends on the local standard of care and is not part of
the study protocol.
MRI targeted 3-core biopsy per lesion (maximum of 2 lesions) and/or a PCaVision
targeted 3-core biopsy (maximum of 2 lesions) will be performed by a second
physician if suspicious lesions have been identified based on imaging. lf
lesions have been identified with both PCaVision and MRI in the same patient,
the order of the targeted biopsies will be randomized. Histological examination
of targeted biopsies will be performed to determine presence of clinically
significant prostate cancer.
Intervention
All patients undergo 3D mpUS using PcaVision and MRI. Suspicious lesions will
be identified based on each imaging technique independently. This will be
followed by a single biopsy session in which the following types of biopsies
might be performed.
hat biopsie strategy is performed is based on the imaging results and local
standard of care. In case of a suspect lesion on imaging targeted biopsies will
be performed. Local standard might dictate that these targeted biopsies are
supplemented by systematic biopsies, this won't be part of the study protocol.
In case of negative imaging, biopsies can be omitted or systematic biopsies can
be performed. This also depends on the local standard of care and is not part
of the study protocol.
A MRI targeted biopsy and/or a PCaVision targeted biopsy will be performed if
suspicious lesions have been identified based on imaging. Per imaging
technique, the following approach is followed. When 1 suspicious lesion has
been identified, 3 targeted biopsies will be taken. When 2 lesions have been
identified, 3 targeted biopsies will be taken per lesion, so 6 biopsies in
total. In case 3 or more suspicious lesions have been found, 2 lesions will be
selected based on: (1) PI-RADS and (2) size for MRI, and (1) severity
indication and (2) size for PCaVision. Consecutively, 3 targeted biopsies will
be taken from these 2 selected lesions.
So, the maximum number of targeted biopsies per imaging technique is 6, and the
maximum number of biopsies per patient is 24 including 12 systematic biopsies.
lf lesions have been identified with both PCaVision and MRI in the same
patient, the order of the targeted biopsies will be randomized. All biopsies
(systematic and targeted) will be performed in a single session.
Study burden and risks
- Possible additional hospital visit as for recording the 3D mpUS
- There is a small risk associated with the use of ultrasound contrast medium
for participants. After using contrast medium in millions of patients in
various types of ultrasound examinations, side effects appear to be rare and
mostly mild. Possible side effects are: change in taste, local pain at the
injection site and erythema of the face or body. In some cases, an allergie
reaction has been described, which is usually mild.
- Doing a 3D mpUS can lead to taking extra prostate biopsies
De Boelelaan 1117
Amsterdam 1081 HV
NL
De Boelelaan 1117
Amsterdam 1081 HV
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
· be male
· have an age of 18 years or older
· be scheduled for evaluation by prostate MRI based on a suspicious DRE and/or
elevated serum PSA or as part of active surveillance follow-up
· have signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria
· active (urinary tract) infection or prostatitis
· a patient history with a cardiac right-to-left shunt.
· allergic to sulphur hexafluoride or any of the other ingredients of the
ultrasound contrast agent SonoVue
· current treatment with dobutamine
· known severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure >90 mmHg),
uncontrolled systemic hypertension or respiratory distress syndrome
· any (further) contraindication to undergo MRI or 3D mpUS imaging
· incapable of understanding the language in which the patient information is
given.
· previous treatment of focal therapy for prostate cancer
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL87353.000.24 |