The primary objective:- To investigate the feasibility of capturing in-vivo cross section images of the bladder wall in bladder cancer patients with the OCT catheter.Secondary objectives:- To evaluate the duration of the OCT measurements. - To…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Renal and urinary tract neoplasms malignant and unspecified
- Bladder and bladder neck disorders (excl calculi)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The procedural feasibility of the OCT measurement, assessed by the ability to
create an image of the normal bladder wall and of the bladder tumour(s), as
judged by the operating urologist. A percentage of >60% will be considered as
feasible. This has to be reached in 15 procedures limiting the inclusion to a
maximum of 25 patients.
Feasibility will also be assessed by determining the percentage of images
suitable for diagnosis out of the total number obtained. A percentage exceeding
80% will be deemed feasible.
Secondary outcome
- The duration of the OCT measurements in minutes.
- The overall accordance between the OCT catheter diagnosis of tumour invasion
(stage) compared with the pathological results of the resected tissue(s).
- The overall accordance between the OCT catheter diagnosis of tumour grade
compared with the pathological results of the resected tissue(s).
- The ability of the OCT catheter to acquire assessable images of the resection
bed.
- The accordance between tumour grade and invasion estimated by the urologist
during WLC and the tumour grade and invasion determined by the OCT images and
histopathology.
Background summary
Bladder cancer is the 10th most common form of cancer in the world with 549.000
new cases of bladder cancer and 200.000 deaths in 2018. Despite current
treatment options, 5-year recurrence rates up to 78% have been reported.
Therefore, frequent and long-term follow-up of bladder cancer patients is
required. Up until now, the gold standard for diagnosing bladder cancer is
cystoscopy with subsequent transurethral resection of the bladder tumour
(TURBT). In certain cases a repeat-TURBT (re-TURBT) is necessary to ensure
radicality and to confirm the stage of the tumour. The frequent cystoscopies
and multiple operations result in a substantial burden for bladder cancer
patients and in substantial healthcare costs. Therefore, finding other options
to determine the tumour grading and staging by a so called *optical biopsy* is
necessary. This would enable other treatment options, such as out-patient laser
fulguration or active surveillance reducing the subsequent TURBT after
cystoscopy.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an optical technique that uses infrared
light to create high resolution, real-live images of tissue. OCT has been
studied in the upper urogenital tract for urothelial carcinoma with good
results. However, this is a different situation, since the ureter is a tubular
structure with limited space and the tested OCT probe is a sideward looking
probe. Previously, two different, forward looking, OCT probes have been studied
in the bladder. The studies show different results on sensitivity and
specificity. Some results are very promising, while others show no advantage
for OCT over white light cystoscopy (WLC). However, the studied probes have a
low frames per second (FPS) rate. This results in stammering images and makes
the probes very sensitive for motion artefacts. Furthermore, both OCT catheters
are not on the market (anymore). Since the OCT techniques have improved over
the last decade, a new forward looking OCT probe has been developed. The newly
designed OCT catheter has a much higher FPS rate and has used techniques to
improve the resolution of the images. Therefore, the newly designed OCT
catheter looks promising to improve the diagnosis and treatment of bladder
cancer. The present study is a phase-I feasibility study.
Study objective
The primary objective:
- To investigate the feasibility of capturing in-vivo cross section images of
the bladder wall in bladder cancer patients with the OCT catheter.
Secondary objectives:
- To evaluate the duration of the OCT measurements.
- To determine the depth of invasion of the tumour on the OCT images and
correlate this to the histopathological results of the resected tissue(s).
- To determine the grade of the tumour from the OCT images and correlate this
to the histopathological results of the resected tissue(s).
- To determine if the OCT catheter is able to acquire assessable images of
resection beds.
- To compare the tumour grade and invasion estimated by the urologist during
WLC with the tumour grade and invasion determined by the OCT images.
Study design
A prosepective, mono-center, IDEAL phase IIa clinical study to investigate the
feasibility of the newly designed OCT catheter.
Study burden and risks
There is little burden for the patients. The only burden is a prolonged
operation time which is expected to be approximately 20 minutes. There is no
additional risk for the patient, since the OCT catheter is inserted through the
working channel of the resectoscope that is used for the TURBT. There is no
benefit for participants of this study. The burden and risks of this study are
the same for all participants. The patients will receive the standard of
clinical care during participation and the histopathological evaluation will
not be affected by the study protocol.
Boelelaan 1117
Amsterdam 1081HV
NL
Boelelaan 1117
Amsterdam 1081HV
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
• Age > 18 years.
• Have at least 1 suspected bladder tumour seen at cystoscopy.
• Have a bladder that is accessible for cystoscopy.
• Be in a physical condition to undergo a TURBT.
• Eligible patients must be fully informed about the study and written signed
informed consent must be obtained prior to any study related
investigation/intervention.
Exclusion criteria
• Pregnant or lactating women.
• The only tumour site is at the bladder neck.
• The tumour(s) is larger than 2 centimetres in diameter.
• >5 tumours present.
• Solely a suspected flat lesion present.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL83449.018.23 |